[Michael_Beckwitslightly odd question, would adding `rel="me"` with javascript make it recognized by the computers it's intended for? or should it be statically added only?
GWGAlso, since the authorization endpoint doesn't check the permissions of the user, it could in theory grant a scope that does not reflect a capability the user has
jamietanna[m]But I guess with OAuth, an authorization server is within its rights to ignore scopes provided, and only return the scopes it supports or is happy with. So the client should validate the scopes they've got back from the token endpoint
LoqiMorris is a self-hosted PHP service for storing Webmentions from webmention.io in a JSON format that static sites can use to render them without querying webmention.io on each build https://indieweb.org/Morris
[tantek]aaronpk, GWG, one big use case is wanting to use your domain as your identity, while having WP installed and served from a subdirectory like /blog. That’s a good example of wanting WP to handle micropub, but *nothing* to do with auth/identity which you want to control by other means with your own static index.html
[David_Bryant]For the moment I'm taking a different path, experimenting with Eleventy rather than trying to build my site as a combination of hand-written HTML/JS/CSS + Word Press, but I still have the WP-based setup operational if there's any testing I can do to advance efforts here.
jgmac1106Going to give ihazawebsite a go this semester rather than one shared instance of Known, don’t think the freenom free domains work, I tried atleast thirty different domains, will see if someone will give me a deal on 25 domains
aaronpkbut isn't it more that in that case you don't want Wordpress involved at all with IndieAuth? I don't understand how Wordpress relates to IndieAuth on the domain in that case
[tantek]No “just” there. That’s one option. The other option is that the user wants to completely control their IndieAuth via their home page independent of WordPress
aaronpkI'm not saying either are unreasonable. My question was when would you want to use IndieAuth in Wordpress while also having that controlled outside of Wordpress
aaronpkHaving Wordpress completely separate from your home page and IndieAuth is a great option and in that case you don't need the IndieAuth plugin at all so it's not really relevant to the discussion about the plugin
jamesonqHi, y'all. I'm Jameson — just graduating with a stats PhD, looking to have my own indieweb web site. I was looking for something python- or node-based so I tentatively chose redwind. But "last commit, 4 years ago" isn't encouraging.Let's suppose, then, that I'm strongly anti-PHP (which isn't entirely true, but certainly I'd prefer to explore
jamesonqLet's suppose, then, that I'm strongly anti-PHP (which isn't entirely true, but certainly I'd prefer to explore other options first).I have some experience with Python and Javascript; no substantial experience with Ruby.I'd like to choose something that's reasonably turnkey for now, but which I could conceivably start hacking on in the future if I
jamesonqWilling to put in a couple day's work to get something up and running now, but I'd want it to be something where if I got stuck in a time loop, I could do it in under 4 hours the second time around. I'd probably be actually running this on Heroku.
jamesonqSo, I'd like to use something where there's a community, if possible. If that means I gotta bite the PHP bullet, then so be it. But I doubt that I'm the only one who'd prefer not to, so it's surprising to me that there isn't a clearer option
jamesonqI kinda suspect that the right answer is "Use Flask" or "use Django" or whatever, that the indieweb functionality is just a normal part of what one of those packages does these days
aaronpkand there are also services that can handle some of the pieces like receiving webmentions that you can integrate easier than doing everything from scratch
jamesonqThanks for talking me through this. Your answer isn't a total surprise. I'm here to get informed knowledge, so I'll stick around a while and see if anybody else has something to say on this.
aaronpk[LewisCowles]: mixing HTTP codes with application logic doesn't make a lot of sense here. HTTP 206 is something very specific to the transport layer, not something you want to mix in with authorization
[KevinMarks]Another option as people have said might be a static site generator, then use external services for webmention etc. Hugo is flexible and fast, but in Go not python.
jgmac1106, [AlisonW] and [fluffy] joined the channel