2020-08-14 UTC
[tw2113], [chrisaldrich], KartikPrabhu, j605 and geman joined the channel
# 05:21 hirusi[m] I tested another entry which is also a like with context, and it turns out OK. This is also a wordpress site and probably? uses the same plugins. 👀
# 05:21 Loqi [Ru Singh] 2020-08-14-kev-fishkeeping-story
[jeremycherfas], deltab, oenone, AkyRhO, ben_thatmustbeme, KartikPrabhu, [KevinMarks], dckc, inkjama, loicm, moppy, swentel, [argovaerts], cap_da_flag, [Murray], [chrisaldrich], [Rose], [Ana_Rodrigues], [jgmac1106], [tonz], [pfefferle], deathrow1, [tb], [tw2113] and [schmarty] joined the channel
KartikPrabhu, ndegruchy, [tantek], nickodd, [tb], gRegorLove, leg, [fluffy], [snarfed], tinfoil-hat, [Rose] and jonnybarnes joined the channel; nickodd left the channel
# 19:25 jonnybarnes Quill, on loading the new note page, is making requests to my media endpoint, with params ?q=source&limit=1
# 19:25 jonnybarnes and reading the docs I’m not sure how I’m meant to respond to that
# 19:27 Loqi [dshanske] #14 q=source on Media Endpoint
# 19:28 GWG jonnybarnes: Have you read the latest post popups?
# 19:29 GWG Also, a lot of things moved to stable
# 19:34 GWG jonnybarnes: What are your Micropub itches?
# 19:34 GWG Burning unresolved Micropub problems?
# 19:39 GWG aaronpk: As a living spec, Micropub can now accept PRs to add the stable extensions?
# 19:40 jonnybarnes at the moment, just using Quill without my server logging an error :P
# 19:41 jonnybarnes though thats partly an oversight in how I coded up handling GET requests to the media endpoint
# 19:41 jonnybarnes if it doesn’t know about the q value being used I end up getting a PHP TypeError cos I’m a dunce
# 19:42 aaronpk i suppose that's something to consider, we haven't really talked about how to incorporate extensions
# 19:48 GWG aaronpk: That's the question. I would write up some PRs for the stable extensions if so.
# 19:48 GWG The question is...if it is stable, is it no longer an extension?
# 19:51 GWG At the least, it could go into a section on the spec called extensions that MAY be supported.
# 19:59 sknebel I feel it'd still make sense to track those in extra documents, referenced from the main?
# 20:05 GWG sknebel: We need some sort of a clean format then...
# 20:06 GWG Maybe move proposed extensions to a page separate from stable ones on the wiki and rewrite stable in more definitive language?
# 20:09 GWG Or do we need a Micropub extensions html page for stable that is generated off the GitHub repo, similar to the specs?
# 20:10 GWG So, 1. should it be in the spec document? 2. If not, how can we make it a bit clearer?
[pfefferle] joined the channel
# 20:12 sknebel I think format like the spec would be nice. but only my opinion, curious what others think
gRegorLove joined the channel
# 20:24 GWG sknebel: I'd like that just because proposed vs stable... proposed should be neat and clean.
# 20:26 GWG Maybe I'll clean up the stable descriptions a bit regardless
# 20:27 GWG I did the move from the proposed to stable... but didn't change the text
[schmarty] and lahacker joined the channel
[KevinMarks] joined the channel
# 22:22 jonnybarnes and if youve just uploaded a media to be used in a note, it wouldn’t have a published value
# 22:31 GWG jonnybarnes: The response is still under discussion, only url is currently required.
# 22:31 GWG Published would reflect upload date
jonnybarnes joined the channel