[snarfed][jacky] out of curiosity, why couldn’t private feeds go through granary? are you depending on a token in an HTTP header instead of query param? or is it more policy that you wouldn’t want granary accessing private data?
maxwelljoslyn, gRegorLove_, cweiske, swentel and Danielstaleiny joined the channel; nickodd left the channel
Danielstaleinyhey all, I have a question, in the example under Backward compatibility there is example with multiple classes, are both classes needed or only the first ones ?
@mauricerenck↩️ schaue und bei denen ich gerne mal was antworten würde. Geht aber nur noch selten. Und da auch Webmentions nicht dort aufschlagen, lässt man es dann halt ganz sein. Schade. (2/2) (twitter.com/_/status/1324711272298917888)
aaronpk[snarfed] is there a reason a new twitter list might be returning 404 in granary? my existing ones work fine, but i'm trying to add a new one and it just says "Sorry, that page does not exist"
[jeremycherfas]Fell at the first hurdle. The monitor I was planning to use is so old it does not have an HDMI slot. But maybe I can use my video capture card. Worth a try.
KartikPrabhu, leg, [Raphael_Luckom], [tantek], schmudde, fauno and [chrisaldrich] joined the channel
jackygranted, I think I wouldn't want Granary processing private data (like if I could send it a stub URL with info that I wanted to parse, I probably would, like a proxy)
jackygranted this is extreme but I can see a client sending some extra cruft (Powered by MyMicropubClient) and saying it's okay b/c the spec doesn't stop them
jackythere's the obvious "don't use that client again" but I wonder if there's reason enough to surface such a mismatch as an error from the server to the client
jackylike I can see someone building a client that'd be able to detect this (somehow, maybe if they pulled the mf2 for a site from a side-file and noticed a difference)