geoffo, [tantek], [prtksxna], ethanyoo and ShadowKyogre joined the channel
#ShadowKyogreHi everyone. Is snarfed around to help with debugging attempt to implement fed.brid.gy support on my site? If not, have some post type questions I want to ask.
#gRegorLoveNot sure they'll be around tonight, but you can leave messages with Loqi's !tell
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "post types questions" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "post types questions is ____", a sentence describing the term)
ShadowKyogre joined the channel; ShadowKyogre left the channel
#ShadowKyogreSo I have a bunch of articles that have some custom fields for them (like characters, locations in worldbuilding, etc). Was thinking how would those work if implemented edit support via Micropub?
#LoqiShadowKyogre: gRegorLove left you a message 10 minutes ago: like this
#gRegorLoveIn ProcessWire specifically it would need to be something custom. I have a very barebones, in-progress Micropub plugin on my site, though I don't use it much.
#gRegorLoveI was trying to think of a ProcessWire-y way to set up "recipes" so if certain fields were published, it would know to use template X, etc.
#gRegorLoveBut didn't make it far, honestly. The plugin is mostly custom code specific to my needs and my site setup. That's the tricky part with ProcessWire templates being able to have any number of fields
#gRegorLoveTaking a step back, though, are you talking about setting up a Micropub client that would have those custom fields?
#GWGDidn't ben_thatmustbeme have that in his Micropub client?
#gRegorLoveI'm talking about the other side of it, the Micropub server in ProcessWire understanding what to do with the different fields
#gRegorLoveProcessWire doesn't have an internal idea of "post type" like WordPress
#gRegorLoveBut that could be a starting point. Was it inkblot?
#ShadowKyogregRegorLove: Yes, a micropub client with those fields. Was pondering if I would need to make a custom bookmarklet to go, "Hey I saw this in my browser, let's dump it in a linkblog collection."
#ShadowKyogreSince it felt like would need to play a bit with Admin actions or similar to make such functionality since micropub's a bit weird with PW
#ShadowKyogre!tell snarfed I need some help with debugging fed.brid.gy support on my site. Fixed my redirects so they point to bridgy, got my posts listed in a feed, and implemented WebSub. I can discover myself on Mastodon, but I can't see my feed via that.
[jgmac1106] joined the channel; ShadowKyogre left the channel
#GWGTrying to add some additional unit testing to my IndieAuth endpoint this week. Unfortunately, it means the PR size is going to grow, which may delay the review. Had hoped to put it on the gift calendar.
#Loqi[snarfed]: ShadowKyogre left you a message 2 hours, 36 minutes ago: I need some help with debugging fed.brid.gy support on my site. Fixed my redirects so they point to bridgy, got my posts listed in a feed, and implemented WebSub. I can discover myself on Mastodon, but I can't see my feed via that.
#[snarfed]!tell ShadowKyogre hey, sorry for the trouble! have you sent webmentions to bridgy fed for any of your posts? it doesn’t automatically propagate all of your existing posts, you have to trigger it for each one. details: https://fed.brid.gy/#use
#GWG[snarfed]: I like the idea of testing. I hate actually doing it
#[snarfed]that’s ok! it’s a bonus if you enjoy it, but not necessary. you get all the benefits regardless
#[snarfed]one thing to try is write tests at the same time you write a given a feature (or bug fix), not later. then you can use them to speed up/replace manual testing
#GWGFor now, I need to test everything but the low level tests for IndieAuth
#[snarfed]aaronpk i thought through browser extension backfeed more, and i probably have to go the opposite direction from you. bridgy has a lot of functionality (UI, site crawling, etc) that i don’t want to reproduce, so i’ll probably couple mine pretty tightly to bridgy itself
#[snarfed]right, yeah. i can point you to granary’s logic if you want
#sknebel[snarfed]: well, if it's at your home IP, for your account, using an actual browser, ... I'd expect detection to not easily trigger
#sknebelI specifically meant "that the individual user can leave running", not aaron for everyone
#[snarfed]sure! and browser extension is the easiest platform to do that. desktops are less common nowadays, except for maybe gamers
#aaronpkyou could even just leave it open in a tab on your laptop. i have gmail open all day for example
#[snarfed]sure. i have to fetch all of the existing permalinks to get the comments likes etc though, so one more fetch for the profile itself (in a background script) isn’t much difference
hirusi, [chrisaldrich], swentel, jolvera, jjuran, ben_thatmustbeme, schmudde, reed_, [jgmac1106], sp1ff, kitt, craftyphotons__ and [barryf] joined the channel
#[barryf]GWG if you're around, I should now have a working IndieAuth 1.1 implementation at https://mpubl-br-master.herokuapp.com/ if you wanted to try it out. It's working for jamietanna[m].
#[barryf]Thanks beko. Yes, much better to display back any feedback if possible.
#[barryf]GWG great! I think I can close that issue.
ShadowKyogre, [tantek], [jeremycherfas] and [schmarty] joined the channel
#[tantek][barryf]++ awesome! do you have permalinks for the entries at https://micropublish.net/changelog ? I'd like to cite the "[2.4.0] - 2020-12-13" version for yesterday's IndieWeb Gift Calendar entry!
#[tantek](the id attributes look quite unstable, like they'll change for every change that is added!)
#[tantek]uh, also re: "working IndieAuth 1.1 implementation" AFAIK there's no definition of an "IndieAuth 1.1", aaronpk?
#aaronpkcorrect, that was the colloquial name of the meeting and discussions, but the only actual version numbers are the publish dates of the spec https://indieauth.spec.indieweb.org/
#[barryf]Thanks both. Got it: I'll avoid using "1.1". I'll do a quick blog post with a more permanent URL.