jackylike if an app is known to exist on the Wiki, I wonder if I could show info about people that I follow / have in my contacts list that are marked as users
aaronpkDid bridgy stop sending webmentions for replies to replies? There's defnitely a bunch of replies to things I expected to see that aren't showing up
ZegnatWhat are people's thoughts on “remember this” options on the consent screen? I have been toying with that. E.g. if I granted the indieweb wiki to authenticate me (that is no scopes) and I store the client and redirect URLs, I want it to skip the consent screen next time this same request is done and just let it through.
jamietannaGWG looks good - I'm partial to my solution of only showing PKCE when it's absent, with a warning, but I get why you and others have gone with show it
jamietannaZegnat I'm not sure I want to ever have implicit consent, even for my own tooling, but I get where you're coming from - I'd definitely be interested in having a "you granted this x days ago for `create`..."
ZegnatI think it may also be different between grants (where scopes and longer lived tokens are involved) or simply authentication (such as logging in to the wiki or Telegraph or similar apps)
aaronpki'm not quite happy with how my site currently handles it, i need to tweak it a bit. I think I want logging in to bypass the consent screen after the first time i log in to something
aaronpkright now if an app requests the same scope and all the other things are the same too it will bypass the consent screen the second time, which I think I also like
ZegnatRe scopes: I always show the profile and email scopes, but that’s it. Though that is primarily because my IndieAuth endpoint does not know about the existence of any other scopes...
jamietannathat sounds good - would you do it based on what you allowed it to have, or what was requested? the former, I guess, in case you added `drafts`
jamietannasounds good - I've added an "unknown" section, but may make it more visible that they're not known about. Wouldn't that make it difficult for experimenting with new scopes though?
jamietannaSo up until yesterday, my server didn't understand the `channels` scope because I'd just not added a mapping, but I still allowed myself to approve it so I could use apps
ZegnatNot sure there are any good WordPress examples, but say you are using an Aperture instance to host your Microsub server. WP does not know anything about Microsub scopes. But if I am using WP IndieAuth to login to my Microsub client I still want to be able to grant that client Microsub scopes to send to Aperture.
ZegnatMy reason for allowing scopes I do not know about: the server hosting my indieauth endpoint may not know about it, but the token is going to be used when communicating with a different server and that one needs it.
[Murray]@btrem: if you're going for 11ty, I'd also recommend looking at some of what Max Böck has written. Sia's piece is great, Max has some useful things around the edges, like cache control: https://mxb.dev/blog/persistent-build-folders-netlify/
btremThe freenode notification that I had been mentioned here actually interrupted me from looking up when that control panel/shared hosting account expires. I'm trying to decide if I should move to Netlify.
btremOn a broad level, when deploying a site to Netlify via GitHub, does one commit finished html files (e.g., the output of an 11ty build) and Netlify copies the files? Or does one commit the templates to GitHub, and Netlify runs 11ty in some fashion and create the files and serve them?
[schmarty]Netlify is pretty flexible. i think in general folks commit the templates and content to Github and Netlify runs the build and serves the result.
[schmarty]i've been tempted to switch over to netlify several times! my website runs in a nearly-identical way. updates to git trigger a notification to a process that pulls down the updates, rebuilds the site, pushes the updated compiled files where they will be served, sends webmentions, ...
btremI'm leery of an email service that doesn't have normal smtp and imap so that I can use my own email client. Though I don't *love* Thunderbird, it's better than anything else I'm aware of.
jackyoh that's a bit more out of the way, I would look for a link to the wiki from the app's homepage and check that it has the same name as the app, then look for #Examples and pull out h-cards
jamietannaAlso think I've asked about this before - should we add some official documentation for stable Micropub extensions, as closed issues are a bit harder to grok, especially when looking for expected request/response
jamietannaI'd say spec is more official than wiki tbh, as it then says "you should be supporting this if you say you support IndieAuth of this version"
btremMac OS. I've never encountered this problem before. I looked at the source code, and it's in span elements, with (presumably) css to create line breaks. I just copied and pasted it line-by-line. Painstaking!
jbovebtrem: I just borrowed code from Sia the other week. I found it was easier and more complete to actually have a look at her source code which she graciously shared over on Github.
jboveReminds me that I should add an unique ID to every heading tag on my site's content too actually. hash anchor links are super handy to quickly get to the right section in a page