#doosbooxI'm considering making my website dark. The current CSS rules are: body { max-width: 45em; margin: auto; padding: 0 1em 5em; }
#doosbooxI'm thinking about changing it to: body { max-width: 45em; margin: auto; padding: 0 1em 5em; background-color: black; color: white; } a, a:visited { color: turquoise; }
#doosbooxand this is silly, but I'm kinnda on the fence because it feels like CSS creep and bikeshedding and a bit bloaty
kogepan and hendursaga joined the channel
#sknebeldon't worry about CSS creep as long as it fits in the first HTTPS response packet :D
#sknebel(and after that, probably dont worry either if you hand-write your CSS, your annoyance of dealing with it will step in sooner than any technical issue, but that's like the ultimate performance benchmark :D)
schmudde, KartikPrabhu, chenghiz_ and [grantcodes] joined the channel
#@wolfr_2↩️ Can't really measure SEO. Some microformats (hcard for one) have been a good practice for a while. Mostly overrated in my book. The only
real thing they (might) do is enrich organic search results. Some help with things like webmentions. But it's been a while I bothered really. (twitter.com/_/status/1452684387108245505)
#[tantek]that's a more up to date perspective than I expected in a tweet mentioning "SEO"
gRegor, P1000[d], hendursaga, [chrisaldrich] and [schmarty] joined the channel
#[tantek]reacji << Beware of using/showing angry reacjis: <blockquote>n November 2019, Facebook staffers noticed they had a serious problem. Facebook offers a collection of one-tap emoji reactions. Today, they include “like,” “love,” “care,” “haha,” “wow,” “sad,” and “angry.” Company researchers had found that the posts dominated by “angry” reactions were substantially more likely to go against community standa
#Loqiok, I added "Beware of using/showing angry reacjis: <blockquote>n November 2019, Facebook staffers noticed they had a serious problem. Facebook offers a collection of one-tap emoji reactions. Today, they include “like,” “love,” “care,” “haha,” “wow,” “sad,” and “angry.” Company researchers had found that the posts dominated by “angry” reactions were substantially more likely to go against community standa" to the "See Also" section of /reacjihttps://indieweb.org/wiki/index.php?diff=77597&oldid=77586
System[d] joined the channel
#capjamesg[d]I am going to extend the IndieWeb Search crawler to save a site to WARC files.
#capjamesg[d]I’m hoping to make my own little site archive soon.
#[jacky]I've been wanting to edit posts _directly_ on my site for some time. I've been tinkering locally but being able to like double click a region or hit the konami code to activate "editor" mode would make it easy for me to do quick edits / typo corrections, etc
#[jacky]I figure it'd be best to do it there too since my server knows what the original content structure looks like (technically it queries for it from the micropub server) but it could provide a sort of "render the provided content as if it were a part of this post" endpoint
jamietanna1, gRegorLove_, hs0ucy, akevinhuang2 and tetov-irc joined the channel