LoqiIndieAuth is a federated login protocol for Web sign-in, enabling users to use their own domain to sign in to other sites and services https://indieweb.org/IndieAuth
[tantek]as a client developer, if that's all you want to support, you can kind of protect yourself / set expectations by only asking for that granularity of permission
barnabyI wonder if it’d make more sense to treat the post type limitation as an internal detail, which is stored on the access token but not exposed to client apps in the scope
barnabyI think using that for post type limitations would make more sense until there’s a clear reason for the client app itself to be aware of what post type it’s allowed to make, and what that actually means
barnabyin most cases the post type can be implied from the properties included by the client app, and when that’s not possible, using an internal token property to let the server know how to treat content from that particular client app gets the job done without having to add additional scopes
jackyah yeah then hm I guess I can see that being a way to support clients that don't have the ability to report that (or servers that might not support it)
@kevinmarkshi @TwitterEng - you broke the fallback case in the tweet embedding js for deleted tweets. Previously they would not be decorated and show the <blockquote> html version. Now they're turned into empty white boxes. Do you want us to go back to screenshots? (twitter.com/_/status/1508754955108241414)
[manton]Wonder if it would be useful to push for bloggers to use https://quotebacks.net instead of Twitter embeds. Maybe a browser extension that makes it easy to copy embeds for tweets.
LoqiA quotation is a type of response post that is primarily a subset of the contents of another post, and often has a citation of that other post https://indieweb.org/quotebacks
ebI have been thinking a bit about designing websites for less technical people for "free". I have been seeing an increase of people forming digital gardens with obsidian and blogs with writefreely/substack. I believe in ownership over your content to some degree, but for many the thought of making a static website/wordpress site is daunting. I'm wondering if anyone had had similar thoughts. I
ebenvision something like a coop, where there is shared hosting for websites as a part of this program (if needed). God I feel like an advertisement for some junk, I don't know if this is something people actually need or if it's a good idea. The thought process is somewhat inspired by https://drewdevault.com/make-a-blog, I want to see a very diverse community of indiewebbers, right now it
LoqiNeoCities is a free website hosting silo in the spirit of defunct silo GeoCities (Yahoo shutdown in 2009) that looks like a stepping stone to getting started on the IndieWeb https://indieweb.org/NeoCities
sknebel(just stumbled over it again and wanted to check if we have an article. we dont really cover the social side of it which they at least try to build it seems, but I have no big insight into that either)
@tweetanor@kevinmarks@TwitterEng Hey Kevin! We're doing this to better respect when people have chosen to delete their Tweets. Very soon it'll have better messaging that explains why the content is no longer available :) my DMs are open if you'd like to chat more about this (twitter.com/_/status/1508876355873738752)
barnabytweet URLs don’t contain tweet content in the source any more, so my site’s auto-archiving of everything I link to doesn’t help much in that case