[chrisaldrich]hashtags are fine, but they're always(? are there any that aren't?) silo specific, a URL with a fragment gets me directly to the content (and surreptitiously out of the silo). Hashtags within silos can often be noisy, spammy, and gamed as well. Now if there were, for example, a browser (search-like) extension that would allow me to right click on a hashtag and choose which platform it would resolve on, then *that* would be
[chrisaldrich]I've also wished for this sort of functionality on [[wikilinks]] so that if I were on the IndieWeb wiki, I might potentially choose to follow that link to another site (like Wikipedia or even my own wiki) with a similarly defined resource.
[tantek]capjamesg re: "not very intuitive to be asked to send your Webmention to different URLs", that's not the way to ask for it, you ask for people to link to different URLs depending on their vote, and their publishing system should automatically send the Webmentions accordingly
[snarfed]1[tantek] capjamesg's point probably may not have been wm sending mechanics as much as the bad UX of asking people to understand and navigate multiple posts/permalinks in order to respond to the poll
[snarfed]1also raises in my mind the q of, how do we decide when to use explicit mf2 vs content heuristics for semantics? eg likes use u-like-of, but reacji just use the "is content a single emoji" test
[snarfed]1we're debating similar options here. eg u-vote-for/against is explicit mf2, hashtags and fragments are content heuristics, multiple URLs is...something else entirely I guess
[tantek]since votes/polls are open ended (Twitter & IG examples clearly demonstrate this), it makes no sense for distinct microformats properties for votes/polls choices
[tantek]and since the choices in practice are open ended, it's not clear that even a minimal subset like for/against is worth doing (because that's not how people actually use polls e.g. on IG and Twitter)
[tantek]capjamesg, I'd say go analyze the UX how existing platforms do it ("aggregating answers and calculating the result"), take screenshots, document it on /poll (once that's been separated from /question 🙂 )
[snarfed]1oh yeah I don't think anyone was proposing explicit mf2 for every possible poll answer. a more realistic idea would be something like p-rsvp, eg <span class="p-poll-response">2-3 cups</span>
[snarfed]1right. the catch is that silos can own the responding UX end to end, whereas indieweb can't as easily. so part of what [tantek] is getting might be, what's the indieweb UX for responding to a poll?
[tantek]why does the poll response have to be different from the content of the reply? when you respond to a poll on Twitter or IG, you don't get to add additional commentary
[snarfed]1one question here may be, if you're on a poll page, how does that site/page help you author a micropub post aimed at your own site that maybe auto-fills your response?
[tantek]or even better, how could an indieweb "poll" post provide vote buttons for each of the choices with the labels of your choice (again, the way Twitter and IG do it)
[tantek]because "chatting about what's possible" almost always goes way beyond the scope of solving the actual problem you're trying to solve, and then you get stuck with more complexity than you needed in the first place
[Scott_Jack]While technically Twitter and IG polls are like an embedded element or sticker, both allow for custom replies - Twitter as a tweet, Instagram as a DM.
[snarfed]1sorry, I take that back, target page does need to serve for wm endpoint discovery, so the 418 page would still need to advertise the wm endpoint in either HTML or header
[snarfed]1(but theoretically you could send any target to a wm endpoint, and it could accept the wm even if the target page isn't serving at that point in time)
Loqidark mode is a feature of websites and apps that change the color scheme to be easier to read at night or in low light settings https://indieweb.org/dark_mode