barnaby[keithjgrant]++ congrats! yep storing the token is a fairly common mistake I think, especially when it’s sent as part of the request body. I remove it from the post body in my MP library to reduce how much that happens
tommorrisinteresting post here by someone getting their blog indiewebified, but their h-entry syntax isn't getting picked up by indiwebify.me (which uses the php mf2 parser). https://www.lifelog.be/indiewebifying-my-blog-part-1 - any interest in helping them out or seeing if there's an issue with the parser
tommorrisgiven tailwind probably won't go away, might not be a bad idea to hack together a way for uf2 parsers to selectively exclude likely overlaps. from my reading of the tailwind docs, it looks like h-[0-9], h-[0-9]/[0-9] and a few keywords could easily be ignored. guess it might be time to document it on the wiki
[schmarty]snarfed: adactio touts the w3c priority of constituencies quite a bit in his talks about the web, progressive enhancement, making sure things fail well, etc.
barnabyyarrie: there’s your answer right there. he craves attention, and making product announcements from his personal account brings that in bucketloads
barnabyI’ve had him blocked for years, but I think he did something very similar with spacex, live-tweeting updates and analysis from his personal account
yarrielive tweeting important, mostly bs, decisions is one thing, but doing it within replies when the twitter UI for viewing replies is so awful is just insulting
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "Podcasting 2.0" yet. Would you like to create it?_ (Or just say "Podcasting 2.0 is ____", a sentence describing the term)
gRegor[snarfed], For Bridgy Fed, if I want to syndicate some notes, do I need to have the Atom feed advertised on the homepage? I have my articles Atom feed there already, so will it look through both of them?
gRegorHm, the Tailwind h-* stuff isn't ideal for the parsed results, but IWM does still show the first h-entry it finds even if it's nested. I suppose readers would probably fail, though. Monocle preview doesn't show the post.
aaronpkit looks simple at first glance but when you realize all the different combinations of things people try to do with their markup it gets complicated
aaronpkthe one thing a consumer can do with that extra h-full wrapper object is to look for an h-entry with a u-url that matches the URL of the page it's fetched from
barnabyI’d be up for adding a function to mf-cleaner which removes any microformats with these false-positive root classnames from the tree, re-sorting any children back into place
LoqiIf we go with the third option, I'd be slightly pressing the suggestion to parsers to allow for an option to restrict any of the `h-` values to be ones that can represent known values, namely those with defined specifications
This could be an evolvin...
barnabyyeah I don’t think this belongs in a parser library, unless it’s explicitly designed with a batteries-included approach, and puts stuff like this under a separate namespace which makes it clear that it’s an optional extra
barnabyseeing as XRay can consume raw MF2 data, it’d even be possible for people to use mf-cleaner to remove the unwanted objects, and then use XRay to get a normalized representation of them
barnabyI’m wondering if “has no properties” is an additional heuristic I can use for detecting false-positive root classes, although, hm, I guess something with just a root classname would get implied properties
slydudadon't think it was linked, but here are all of the built-in heights for tailwind. issue is it's very easy to make custom classes as well like h-screen-nav
barnabyslyduda: any idea how common that is? for the moment my approach would be to document the built in “official” tailwind classes which could be false positives, assuming that they’re going to be the most widely used
barnabyhmm I could also take the opposite approach of allowing the caller to specify a list of types they *do* want, that way it’s up to them to decide and they can list all the mf2 vocabs they support. Downside is that it’s much more likely to mess with the data structures than removing a short list of known false-positives
[snarfed]gRegor the Atom part of BF is only for Mastodon interop, which I don't totally understand and is years old, so it may have changed or dropped entirely since then
@voxpelli↩️ In my view the IndieWeb content is microformatted and delivered as HTML over HTTP and WebSub with WebMentions used for pings.
Then there are the MicroPub and MicroSub parts as well, but no need to couple publishing tool with publishing place and/or reading tool. (twitter.com/_/status/1592298888891072512)