#dev 2023-02-22

2023-02-22 UTC
#
[tantek] at the root, updates.atom
#
[tantek] good to know they work in Monocle! I wonder how to document that on /footnotes
#
[KevinMarks] They don't work in unmung http://www.unmung.com/feed?feed=https%3A%2F%2Ftantek.com%2Fupdates.atom
#
[KevinMarks] The 1 link goes to https://tantek.com/2023/#t5PU1_note-1
#
[tantek] oh oops forgot remove base in Atom
#
[tantek] one sec
#
[KevinMarks] It may be feedparser picking an absolute url. I have vague memories of that. I know it tries to avoid the '../' type ones
#
[tantek] no I had an explicit xml:base
#
[tantek] I dropped that and now unmung is resolving the relative links to the Atom feed? that was unexpected
#
[KevinMarks] https://pythonhosted.org/feedparser/resolving-relative-links.html says it will make them absolute, so it will use the Atom feed url as the base without it
#
[tantek] hmm, I wonder what the right answer is in the context of an Atom feed, because I doubt any reader handles fragment links *inside* an Atom feed
#
[tantek] I could make the base just be my website, so at least the links would "work" but would take you out of the reader to then show you in the context of the actual post on my home page stream
#
[KevinMarks] There are test cases listed there. I can see the argument for keeping fragment links relative, but that's not what feedparser does by default. There was an issue with embedded images originally
#
[KevinMarks] That would make more sense - do you use embedded images relatively or absolute?
#
[tantek] I don't think I use any relative URLs for images
#
[tantek] ok I put the xml:base back into the Atom feed with my site home page as the base so at least the links "work"
angelo joined the channel
#
[tantek] as in they do something that makes sense
#
[tantek] seems to work ok in unmung now, can you verify [KevinMarks]?
#
[KevinMarks] Yes, redirects out to the html which is OK
jeremycherfas, gRegor, gxt, [fluffy], mro, gxt_, gerben, [campegg], tiim, AramZS, geoffo and [manton] joined the channel
#
[manton] For `mp-sydnciate-to` in Micropub, is there a convention for multiple syndication targets? e.g. comma-separated or `mp-syndicate-to[]` for multiple values? Feel like this should be common but most `mp-` parameters are commands that only appear once.
#
sknebel list in json, multiple mp-syndicate-to[] in form-encoded
#
sknebel like everything else
nora joined the channel
#
[manton] Cool, thanks!
geoffo, petermolnar, IWDiscordRelay and Skyther[d] joined the channel
#
[tantek] That sounds like a good /Micropub#FAQ if you could capture it!
[schmarty], chee1, IWSlackGateway, mro, [tantek], gRegor and gRegorLove_ joined the channel
#
gRegor capjamesg, might already be on your radar, but IndieWeb Search is returning "Your request could not be processed due to a server error.
#
gRegor "
mro, [tw2113_Slack_], [KevinMarks], [aciccarello] and tiim joined the channel
#
[tantek] added a few updates to the /microsyntax page which could use a lot more updating and gardening since we've had a lot of convergence and made a lot of progress since the last time that page had major updates
bterry joined the channel
#
IWDiscordRelay <c​apjamesg#4492> gRegor thanks for sharing!
#
IWDiscordRelay <c​apjamesg#4492> I’ll not be able to fix it for another week 😦
#
gRegor no worries, I was just trying it out to see how it might show review posts