[tantek]!tell prologic you noted that twtxt supports WebSub, but I didn't see any mention of that on indieweb.org/twtxt nor in https://indieweb.org/WebSub#Consuming_Implementations — any chance you could add statements about how twtxt supports WebSub to those wiki pages? E.g. does it publish/notify, act as a hub, and/or consume notifications? If you’re not sure, try testing twtxt with websub.rocks
Loqiprologic: [tantek] left you a message 1 hour, 31 minutes ago: you noted that twtxt supports WebSub, but I didn't see any mention of that on indieweb.org/twtxt nor in https://indieweb.org/WebSub#Consuming_Implementations — any chance you could add statements about how twtxt supports WebSub to those wiki pages? E.g. does it publish/notify, act as a hub, and/or consume notifications? If you’re not sure, try testing twtxt with websub.rocks
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "yarn.social" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "yarn.social is ____", a sentence describing the term)
[0x3b0b]prologic: I'm keeping an eye on your progress because if you actually end up with full-featured federation I'd be moderately tempted to spin up a pod to replace my microblog.pub. And even if you don't, or I don't, it's interesting.
[0x3b0b]A comment on one of your recent yarns, although from what I've seen so far it wouldn't surprise me if you're already taking this into account - keep in mind in considering that "publicly accessible or internal" question that some of what's federated to you will be meant to be seen by either only the actor's followers, or only the actors mentioned
[0x3b0b]...I gotta admit, it's mostly that the idea of being a direct participant in Fediverse, Indieweb, and a third thing all at the same time is just cool. Before I made up my mind what I was going to be doing, when I was considering going fully static and writing everything entirely by hand, I was toying with the notion of trying to maintain a twtxt.net mirror manually while I was at it. But there's also a good chance that between momentum
@tFive years ago last Monday, the @W3C Social Web Working Group officially closed^1.
Operating for less than four years, it standardized several foundations of the #fediverse & #IndieWeb:
#Webmention
#Micropub
#ActivityStreams2
#ActivityPub
Each of ...
https://tantek.com/t5PU1 (twitter.com/_/status/1627966333274177538)
mro, IWSlackGateway2, [KevinMarks]3, [tantek]3, [aciccarello], [dave] and [manton] joined the channel
Loqi[preview] Five years ago last Monday, the @W3C Social Web Working Group officially closed¹.
Operating for less than four years, it standardized seve...
[0x3b0b]Oh, by the way, Tantek, another data point for you on how your footnotes render. Your superscripts come through to microblog.pub with the links in both directions intact...but not the IDs. So they're rendered as links...to fragments that aren't there. Since I just found that out, I haven't looked to try to figure out whether I can fix that on my end.
[snarfed]^ we've discussed this a fair amount recently, whether mf2 parsers should automatically convert fragment links in content to absolute links, or keep them fragments in the hope that they "just work" when embedded elsewhere, like microblog.pub
Loqi[preview] [Ken Schwencke] Does anyone on here work on the Twitter API or know someone who does? Because it looks like with recent Twitter API changes, @ProPublica can't track deleted tweets from politicians anymore w/ Politwoops -- https://projects.propublica.org/politwoops/ ...
[snarfed]the correct answer is, "no one works on the Twitter API any more, they all got fired. any changes are now being done by engineers from all the way across the org who don't know it much, if at all, and will probably break more than they successfully change."
[tantek]0x3b0b interesting about microblogpub and dropping the ID attributes on links. Do you have a reference to how microblogpub sanitizes HTML before displaying? E.g. see other entries here: https://indieweb.org/sanitize#Software_Examples
[tantek]either way that kind of code spelunking would be useful, both for documenting its existing HTML sanitizing, and considering a very small PR to allow ID on <a href> elements
[0x3b0b]Yeah, I've got a short stack of things to offer to contribute back upstream already. But because it's on Sourcehut and takes git-send-email and I'm used to Gitlab merge requests, and also because some of it I need to explain why I was changing it and some of it I need to ask whether they'd actually want (for example, the configurable switch to newbase60ed-timestamp IDs rather than UUIDs), I haven't gotten that far yet. :D