2024-01-17 UTC
# 00:04 [tantek] I also found it ironic that the comments were visible when the article body was not! I've seen the opposite (which kinda makes more sense, i.e. no need to index the text of comments in search engines etc.)
# 00:06 capjamesg Ooh, I love the post layout.
# 00:13 [tantek] iframe embedding in a permalink for your article content is even more weird. do iframes even contribute to the text index of the page itself? (for web search)
# 00:14 [tantek] having search engines only index the comments on your post as the content of your post permalink seems undesirable
jacky joined the channel
# 00:49 aaronpk i mean that only works because there is no user authentication happening
# 00:50 jacky well not even fair, yeah, I misconstructed this
[tw2113], lockywolf, geoffo, gRegor and gRegorLove_ joined the channel
# 02:14 [schmarty] gRegor: whoops, yes, thanks. i rely on my address bar autocomplete rather than my meat brain.
CRISPR joined the channel
# 02:29 jacky indieauth question: let's say a remote IndieAuth server wants to allow someone to set a destination for a token request
# 02:29 jacky I figure that the IndieAuth server would have to have access to the authenticating site's concepts of destinations (perhaps from their Micropub server or via manual entry)
# 02:30 jacky does anyone have ideas on how else that could be formed?
# 02:30 jacky A use case (I'm considering) is being able to use my site to sign in to post for another (namely for eating the cooking of writing Koype's own site using itself)
# 02:30 GWG- jacky: Are you asking for destination limited tokens?
# 02:31 jacky effectively but it seems like this might be some sort of 'metadata' attached to a token that wouldn't have to be specific to metadata
# 02:31 jacky because this could work for channels as well
# 02:31 GWG- How is that different than Micropub's mp-destination?
# 02:32 jacky This is in the act of authorization from a IndieAuth server that isn't in-built to the same Micropub server
lockywolf joined the channel
# 02:32 jacky like on its consent screen and how to surface/fetch that information in a way that's not too obstructive
# 02:37 GWG- I'm not 100% sure about how that might work.
# 02:40 GWG- I'm curious though.
jacky, eitilt and lockywolf joined the channel
# 02:57 jacky I will say that this blog-iverse discussion is a great example of everyone using their blogs to talk about this topic
lockywolf and [0x3b0b] joined the channel
# 03:24 [tantek] Wait, you mean long form discussion doesn't fit into 140/280/500 characters?
# 03:31 [0x3b0b] I keep halfway forgetting that the 5000 character limit at Fedisroot is not the norm
geoffo, AramZS, [0x3b0b], reillypascal, [snarfed], [Jo], [aciccarello], [calumryan], [jacky], gRegor, gRegorLove_, alecjonathon, srushe, roxwize, capjamesg, vikanezrimaya, ancarda and eb joined the channel
gRegorLove_, SoniEx2, rjomara, geoffo, firepoet, [Joe_Crawford] and Xe joined the channel
[marksuth], gxt, [jeffpaul] and gRegorLove_ joined the channel
bterry and [0x3b0b] joined the channel