#[Murray](also a shame about the AI-generated image)
#[tantek]"*proven* alternative" and "*need* feedback" are an odd pairing in the same sentence
[schmarty], barnaby and sebbu joined the channel
#[Jo]that ai puzzle image is so bad. who looks at these and goes "yup thats going in the article"
[qubyte] joined the channel
#[qubyte]Nothing annoys me like AI “stock” images do. It’s a useful thing to filter on though.
#[qubyte]It’s built for my setup, but in case anyone needs some example code (particularly for the auth flow and the post payload composition), here’s my github action workflow and a script to syndicate notes with images and links/bookmarks in jf2 format to Bluesky. I’m not really happy that Bluesky is grabbing so much mind share, but I don’t mind supporting it for POSSE. https://github.com/qubyte/qubyte-codes/pull/1059
#Loqi[preview] [qubyte] #1059 Add Bluesky syndication of notes and links
#[qubyte]The GitHub action workflow really just calls out to a node script. This is nice because it means I can use it directly for testing locally.
#capjamesg[d][qubyte] OpenAI publishes Content Credentials, which you could use to build an extension to filter out images.
#capjamesg[d]Photoshop adds them to images edited with AI, as does OpenAI when you generate one.
kerem joined the channel
#[qubyte]Yup, I do understand. And nobody will ever strip that metadata off!
barnaby, Julia and [aciccarello] joined the channel
#[snarfed]2defaults matter, 99% is still useful, but you're right, content creds/C2PA don't "solve" this for all images
#[snarfed]2...but for specific individual images that are important and need verification, if those images use C2PA, it can provide a meaningful guarantee that they either were or weren't AI-generated
#[snarfed]2the usual example is, if a photo is genuine and people want to use it as evidence for something, C2PA can prove that it's real and not AI-generated or modified
#aaronpkoh shoot he asked me to fix that yesterday
#Loqiaaronpk: gRegor left you a message 23 hours, 10 minutes ago: I get the allowed client_id for IBC updated in indielogin? It's been `https://indiebookclub.biz/id` for a bit now, but just realized today it was preventing some people from signing in since indielogin has it without the "/id"
#gRegor[Joe_Crawford], let me know if you can sign in to IBC now
#gRegorAnd [snarfed]2, let me know if it still warns about PKCE. Confirmed that `code_challenge` and `code_challenge_method` are in the query params, so it *looks* right
#[snarfed]2[gRegorLove] still getting the same error on https://indiebookclub.biz/ . cc GWG, this ^ is with the WP IndieAuth plugin v4.5.2
#[snarfed]2GWG I'm getting the "The authorization header was not returned on this test, which means that your server may be stripping the Authorization header." warning on my site health, so maybe that's the problem? not sure though