#meta 2018-09-05

2018-09-05 UTC
Hobbyboy14, vivus, Zegnat, eli_oat, benwerd, [tantek], salamanderrake, [eddie] and [dougbeal] joined the channel; vivus left the channel
#
[dougbeal]
"We will have a meetup at social! Cup and bar, 10am-noon"
#
Loqi
πŸ˜„
benwerd and [iambismark] joined the channel
#
gRegorLove
adds to the wiki
#
gregorlove.com
edited /events/2018-09-06-xoxofest (+575) "/* IndieWeb Related Sessions Meetups */ XOXO IndieWeb Meetup"
(view diff)
#
aaronpk
11 hours until remind aaronpk to post indie events for the webdensday and Friday xoxo meetups
#
Loqi
I added a countdown scheduled for 2018-09-05 8:51am PDT (#6362)
[asuh], grumble210 and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#
[kevinmarks]
Where's the Wednesday one? I'm not sure if I will have mobile data when I land
[dougbeal] joined the channel
#
[dougbeal]
I don't think we have decided yet.
jjuran, swentel and [kevinmarks] joined the channel
#
[kevinmarks]
OK, well I have mobile data now in theory, we'll see. I land about 3:30pm so I'll have time to find out. Let me know
swentel, [jgmac1106], [grantcodes], KSProgramer and jjuran joined the channel
#
aaronpk
Let's do Von Ebert Brewing again since I know they have plenty of non table seating
[eddie], jackjamieson and [tantek] joined the channel
#
Loqi
remind aaronpk to post indie events for the webdensday and Friday xoxo meetups
#
Loqi
Countdown set by aaronpk on 2018-09-04 at 9:51pm PDT
benwerd, [Serena], swentel, gRegor-mobile, tantek__ and [cleverdevil] joined the channel
#
gRegor-mobile
sgtm aaronpk. What time?
#
aaronpk
tantek isn't getting in til late right? but others will be here earlier?
#
aaronpk
shall we say starting at 7pm?
#
gRegor-mobile
πŸ‘
#
aaronpk
omg that venue search makes this so much easier
#
aaronpk
why didn't I do that ages ago
[chrisaldrich] and [grantcodes] joined the channel
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /events/2018-09-06-xoxofest (+112) "add indie event links"
(view diff)
#
tantek__
aaronpk++ awesome! Hopefully I can meet y'all after the meetup tonight!
#
Loqi
aaronpk has 59 karma in this channel over the last year (312 in all channels)
[eddie] joined the channel
[cleverdevil], benwerd, [grantcodes], [manton] and [dougbeal] joined the channel
#
[dougbeal]
I'm going to be working/indiewebbing Courier at 2 pm
benwerd_ and gRegor-mobile joined the channel
#
gRegor-mobile
πŸ‘‹ Portland
#
aaronpk
πŸ‘‹
#
gRegor-mobile
Trying to add Indieweb Slack on my phone... Did we use special email addresses for that? It can't seem to find the workspace with my email.
#
gRegor-mobile
domain at indieweb.org, or something?
#
aaronpk
we used to, your account might be old enough that yours is like that
#
aaronpk
I can check what email you used
#
gRegor-mobile
Thanks
#
aaronpk
gregorlove.com at indiewebcamp.com
[gregorlove] joined the channel
#
[gregorlove]
That worked, thanks.
#
aaronpk
πŸŽ‰
#
aaronpk
you should be able to change the email on your account to your own email now
#
Loqi
it is probable
[dougbeal] joined the channel
#
[dougbeal]
πŸ‘‹
#
tantek__
Would be interesting to evaluate how indieweb as a community does regarding the points of discussion in this post: https://anna.flourishing.stream/2018/09/04/open-code-is-not-working-open/
#
Loqi
Open code != working open
#
tantek__
And in particular, what are the ways that we could do better?
#
tantek__
(do better than our present/past selves that is, not setting up any kind of competition/comparison with Mastodon)
#
aaronpk
I saw that
#
aaronpk
it seems like most of the problems stem from a single person having authority over what gets accepted into the project
#
aaronpk
since we don't have just one project, the closest analogy would be specs I guess? possibly the wiki since that can be seen as an "authoritative" source?
#
Zegnat
Hmm, in part I might have done something like that. I think there have been feature requests for selfauth that simply weren’t an itch of mine or something I would use, which I have then not worked on because I wouldn’t be eating that dogfood.
#
Zegnat
In a way that is the same thing right? Gargron not wanting to share decision-making (point 1) could be because he is first and foremost building for himself?
#
aaronpk
yes, it seems there is some line between building for yourself and having a responsibility once other people start using the software
#
Zegnat
I do like those 3 points of working open, and I can totally see them apply to general community efforts and not just code. That third point is one we were discussing not long ago, visavis the use of the wiki and who would contribute to it
[chrisaldrich] and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
#
[jgmac1106]
I think it is the federated nature. City states and nation states find themselves in competition in federalist systems
#
[jgmac1106]
When you concentrate power in a few without clear paths to mobility the masses suffer
#
[jgmac1106]
[aaronpk] Loqi needs a response when someone doesn't have a chat name
#
aaronpk
hmm maybe. I was worried about false positives
#
[jgmac1106]
Something like, "Hmmm, we aren't friends yet. You should send them these directions to create a chat name"
[gregorlove] joined the channel
#
AngeloGladding
*cough* reference implementation *cough*
#
AngeloGladding
right now it's uniquely akward navigating "IndieWeb source code"
#
AngeloGladding
awkward* :)
#
AngeloGladding
it's just various individuals' usually unpolished github repos
#
AngeloGladding
it makes sense but it's different than the rest
#
tantek__
variety and diversity is better than /monoculture in the long run, always
benwerd joined the channel
#
tantek__
AngeloGladding: that being said, acknowledged that we can do better about navigating IndieWeb *projects* and in particular, I still have lots of clean-up to do on the /projects page
#
AngeloGladding
iif success is achieved
#
tantek__
AngeloGladding: that's the beautify of indieweb approaches, success is achieved if even you yourself use your software regularly for your primary web identity
#
tantek__
hard to beat that
#
tantek__
also exceptionally resilient
#
AngeloGladding
ah is there anything else like it!?
#
AngeloGladding
where each network user writes their own client/server?
#
AngeloGladding
if there isn't a precedence then i can see how it'd be even that much more difficult for outsiders to appreciate
#
aaronpk
"reference implementation" is exactly the kind of thing I want to avoid
#
AngeloGladding
me too
#
AngeloGladding
but it's certainly the expectation
#
AngeloGladding
aaronpk i'd much rather publish canopy code and have someone yank the bootstrap utility and create their own simplified tor-based implementation with it
#
AngeloGladding
evolutionary
#
aaronpk
at the building block level, sure
#
AngeloGladding
aaronpk you mention the "authority" of spec writer -- what about the de facto authority of majority implementation?
#
AngeloGladding
i wonder if there's any ways that could go sour. one idea comes to mind: