[tantek]Aaronpk, zegnat the mf1 markup needed the spans/abbrs that were in there before because the deployed h2vx doesn’t support the time element unfortunately. Dev.h2vx.com has some experimental time element support if you want to try it
[tantek]Alternatively if you know of another service to turn h-event into .ics so people can subscribe to events in their iCal, we could use that instead of h2vx. That’s the use-case this is for
[tantek]Using the templates consistently would make that easier since they could include any necessary backcompat smarts, just as they can be DRY even if they output duplicate info
[eddie]Make sure any stuff that needs to be done (that you don't do yourself) is in https://indieweb.org/to-do before December to help provide fodder for 2018-12-indieweb-challenge 😄
tantek.comedited /reader (+438) "social readers section at top since that's what's new, exciting, and actually broadly usable today, move Indigenous and Together there, note IndieWeb examples need review and updating" (view diff)
[tantek]feel free to improve that new section - this was a quick rough attempt to highlight the most relevant stuff with visually compelling screenshots quickly
[tantek]ideally each of our generically named pages is similarly appealing, showcasing screenshots from best examples of indieweb projects / products / services
tantek.comedited /reader (+15) "note feed readers are read-only, more descriptive than "legacy", explicitly note Social Readers are interactive" (view diff)
[tantek]quick question on yesterday's entry though - it says "Planned IWC-Online" but AFAIK that's not actually done yet right? Like we don't have a set date, way to RSVP for it etc.?
[tantek]Not to diminish what aaronpk did with 100daysofindieweb I'm pretty sure the expectation is actually *shipping* something (not just "working on it") on every day
[tantek]IMO for 100daysofindieweb, better to have note the one thing you shipped, rather than that plus "worked on" things that haven't shipped or aren't really visible results I guess? (like what's the visible outcome / shipping of "debated switching CMS (again) " ?)
[tantek]or am I misinterpreting this and is it more of a personal log of 100daysofindieweb related things you've worked on? (which is also a great thing to do, just a different variant than the original)
aaronpkmy goal with it was to ship some visible improvement every day. so it was a combination of completing something plus also making sure that thing was visible to others.
[tantek]also good to self-limit to one, I mean if you do more than one in a day, maybe save "launching" it for the next day just to give yourself a breather 🙂
[tantek]or queue up the things you're making incremental progress for being able to "finish up" in a future day so you reduce your future cognitive load
[jgmac1106]Is community shipped or built? I am leaving my evangelism out... Though that is quantifiable x post today, but stuff like planning IWC-Online or IWC-New Haven will take time. I will count community activities
[jgmac1106]But like [aaronpk] said, I shipped a plugin yesterday... Do not like it so it will be chunked.. One day will be write templates, next day functions
[jgmac1106]I also have to learn all this stuff as I go. I can't just ship a plugin built on php...first I have to spend hours learning how... I do not track that
[jgmac1106]No when I reach day 43 and decide... F this I just want to figure out how to do this with flat files.... Well then I am royally screwed if "shipped" is metric of success
[jgmac1106]I will give you, "debated switching LMS" has lower value but then I was also working through with someone on how to edit their htaccess file if running Known on Apache... So it weird way it sparked that outcome...
aaronpkI liked it as well. it definitely biases the kind of things that get done during the challenge, so you should be aware of that, but I thought it was useful
[jgmac1106]Been trying to add the list item and then link to a post... But it's day five... Already tired.... The low bar this morning might have been "oh shit what will I do today" but then I was able to ship something on my site after hating the plugin and redoing my stylesheet
[jgmac1106]Now tomorrow I can write a tutorial on Grint files to compile your stylesheets in Known (right after I learn how to do that and what a Grint file is)
tantek.comedited /Organizers (+614) "fix dfn grammar, simplify slightly, add proposal for making "organizer" more active to focus and encourage" (view diff)
[tantek]1hey organizers past and present, please take a look at the proposal at the top of the page there (just past the definition) and add your summary +1/0/-1 opinion and thoughts/feedback - https://indieweb.org/Organizers - appreciated!!!
gRegorLoveI think the opt-out might refer to people like me, who would no longer fall under the criteria. We discussed it a bit while he's here. I don't mind at all, myself, I'm in favor of the change.
[jgmac1106]I know I tease... And I agree....and would rather have our diversity goals met with current filters but happy to create filters that allow for explicit D&I efforts
[jgmac1106]Cali is hard... Travel expensiveSupposed to go to a conference in Palm Springs next week but bailed due to cost (and moral weirdness talking literacy and poverty as a swank resort)
[jgmac1106]The last vHWC-America's, while a few technical difficulties went well, the Convo on mf2 and WordPress, improving accessibility, and your php mf2 talks just as good as any f2f.
[eddie]I do think virtual HWC/IWCs should all count, as it takes time and effort (maybe not as much as in person) and shows an active desire to further IndieWeb participation.
[eddie]As someone who would be “opted-out” I think it’s an okay rule. I believe next month (Dec 2018) would opt me out as an organizer. I’m actively trying to figure out how I can continue to help move IndieWeb forward, whether online or in person. I expect to be able to “renew” my organizer creds through virtual until I find a way to make a sustainable in person HWC happen
[eddie]and there are a ton more people who have expressed interest but not voted for dates, so I think I’ll start pinging them and see if I can get some more responses
[eddie]So maybe what I’ll do is ping those interested to see if those dates are in conflict just to confirm we’re not ruling out potential participators