[tantek]I looked into the internet archive dweb meetup event referenced in that thread https://www.eventbrite.com/e/decentralized-web-sf-meet-upapril-tickets-60842622923 ^^^ and just to be clear, Tim's not going to be there, instead an Inrupt engineer, Jackson Morgan will demo (the event links to his LinkedIn profile, no personal site, Solid POD, nor even Twitter/GH which seemed a bit odd)
[jgarber], ketudb[m] and ichoquo0Aigh9ie joined the channel
[tantek]re: dev chat about github projects - I think we had some criteria about things being at least selfdogfooded / mature enough for others to *use* (not just contribute to) before putting them in the indieweb community repo
[tantek]I don't think we had any "formal" process or criteria for "graduating" things to the indieweb repo though so it's a bit of a judgment call and asking the community case by case is probably ok
[tantek]Consider some criteria like: 1. Am I eating my own cooking with this code on my main site? 2. Is it in good enough shape (including README/docs) for someone *else* to come along and make use of it successfully on their own site?
[grantcodes]I'm also interested in putting at least one of my js libraries on the indieweb github. It's already used in a bunch of products (not just me) so think it's suitable 🙂
[Rose]Continuing from #chat with Zegnat: I would suggest we start the day with lunch and do our own sessions, then we can be around at least for the first half of the Portland sessions?
[jgarber]I’m reasonably confident I can answer “yes” to both of those for the new repo I added to the organization last night. No worries if anyone disagrees, of course.
[Rose]The advantage of starting after lunch would be that we wouldn't have already had a full IndieWeb day by the time Portland starts. Though equally we could do morning-mid afternoon, ice cream break (or snack/excursion of choice), and then come back for remote participation on the west coast
Zegnat[Rose]: true. It is summer, so with a little luck the ice cream place in the harbour will be open. (Åmål has its guest harbour literally inside of town, which is really nice in summer.)
ZegnatI like the idea of starting the day after lunch and run sessions. I just need to formalise some sort of schedule so we can actually start advertising. (And I need to inform the venue.)
[eddie]I put it on pause after reaching out to you (and the other previous offered co-organizers) because I didn’t want to try to set up anything until after I had at least 1 co-organizer
ZegnatBut if this one works, and we have some good info on paper, I actually already have a future venue in Gothenburg in mind for the next Sweden event.
[Rose]I probably didn't name that well, it should have been "Remote Viewing Party Schedule", but it's a wiki, we can all agree on a name here and update it!
Zegnatvoxpelli: the other party I have in Gothenburg who may be interested in providing a venue wouldn’t go any sooner than that either. We should definitely coordinate, feels like!
ZegnatNote that if this summer event works out, it might be possible for SV to also host us in Malmö, if you are still looking for venues. (Another reason to coordinate.)
aaronpkthat page is good for people who want to look for updates about the indieweb community, whereas the github org stuff is for people writing code or getting even more involved
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "IndieWeb GitHub organization" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "IndieWeb GitHub organization is ____", a sentence describing the term)
[Rose]That makes sense, it just seems like it might be easier to keep on top of what's happening for each event with a forum thread for each. And for non-code projects (things that don't have a git) a place to collate discussion specifically
[tantek]IndieWeb GitHub organization is https://github.com/orgs/indieweb a [[GitHub]] organization setup for community developed and maintained projects that are of high enough quality for new developers to discover and quickly start using to improve their personal sites, CMS, or [[Get Started]] developing personal site software.
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "example of a non-code project" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "example of a non-code project is ____", a sentence describing the term)
aaronpkso if that's the specific pain point that is bringing up the thought of using forum software, then we should try to fix the event wiki page layout to better have a place for that kind of discussion
[Rose]There's also event adjacent discussion, which perhaps would be ideally collated in the Wiki, but whilst it's still in the formation stages might be better off outside of the wiki? It's hard to say what belongs in the wiki or not.
[Rose]Hmm, project is the wrong word. But like the discussions that were had on the home page for IW, that's scattered around - though of course the key points were summarised on the wiki
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "new home page" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "new home page is ____", a sentence describing the term)
Loqi2019/homepage is a project to update the IndieWeb community homepage in 2019, in particular with a three column layout designed for onboarding three common sets of visitors and new IndieWeb community members https://indieweb.org/three_column_design
aaronpkyeah a lot of the issues around "where is this written down" or "didn't we cover this before" are not actually *because* of the software we're using, and also wouldn't necessarily be solved by using different software
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "home page for IW" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "home page for IW is ____", a sentence describing the term)
[Rose]I can be a little hesitant with editing the wiki because once I've done it it's there for all to see and could appear to be official - however it might be incorrect
aaronpkwhen that happens to me, I usually either find or make a "brainstorming" section on the page, or at the very least sign my name on the page so that it looks less official
[Rose]Thanks! I've been mulling on this for a while. Of course, it's up to us to store the important information in the wiki, but figuring out what is important is hard.
[Rose]I think I also need to be faster at creating pages on my own site where I collect information that's useful to me - because then even if I don't think it's necessarily important for the community I can store it somewhere retrievable.
@emilio"Si no le pones un nombre no existe"
A mis conocidos que les encanta "encerrar" sus cosas en las redes sociales (de empresas privadas), siempres les recomiendo que publiquen en su propio sitio web y después lo compartan donde quieran
Es decir POSSE:
https://indieweb.org/POSSE (twitter.com/_/status/1121539088476180480)
[tantek], [manton] and [schmarty] joined the channel