#[tantek]GWG, I’d say top priority is 1. getting the two IWC Berlin2 keynotes punished (as separate videos), then 2. intros, then 3. Hackday demos, then everything else (as separate session videos)
#GWGThe session videos, save two, are up as they don't usually get editing.
#GWGI have a audio plus screen version of Yulia's keynote set up.
#GWGI just finished, with the help of a family member, testing the upgrades to the equipment for IWC SF
[fluffy] joined the channel
#GWGTo address the feedback, I got an inexpensive wireless microphone that I can place at the podium as well as a second microphone that can feed into the HDMI recorder
#[tantek]Jacky it is a deliberate copy editing design challenge 😜
#[tantek]You should see how hard I custom tweaked entries for days for last year’s calendar to make them minimal, fit nicely and still have a meaningful summary
#[tantek]Bad framing. It’s not a fight. It’s brainstorming
#jeremycherfasAnd one is, in my view, used far too often as a substitute for the other.
#[Rose]I think the IndieWeb Community Challenge doesn't sound too bad, it's clear that it's a group effort, and implies it is _for_ the community as well.
#jeremycherfasBad framing: you tell me you don't like a word I like. Sounds like it is about more than framing. Tell me, instead, how gifting differs from giving, without nouns on either.
#[tantek]Contextual use I’ve seen has been quite different
#jeremycherfasI would point out, too, that the religious significance of advent is a secondary meaning. I could, for example, refer to the advent of the IndieWeb, referring to discussion between tantek and aaronpk that, in my understanding, lead to the ideas gaining traction.
#[tantek]Nah, this is about de-religioning the specific capitalized Advent
#jeremycherfasI could argue that you are trying to religionize IndieWeb Challenge.
#[tantek]Again, there are plenty of prior art for these kinds of projects (Eg 24days)
#[tantek]Yeah when you start phrasing with “could argue” then you’ve likely crossed over from useful discussion toward a goal to argument to argument sake so it’s the rest of the statement is best pruned
#jeremycherfasYou want to piggyback on the idea of Advent in December, which is 25 days long if wee are going to be pedantic, without using the word advent and without sticking to the time limit. And I ask, why bother?
#[tantek]Yes we stared with 24 days long if you want to be pedantic but extended it because 24 wasn’t special to the community
#jeremycherfasSeems to be this season is also a time of giving gifts, so that's my own preference. But [Rose] has a good point about Community, which could also be at any time of year.
#[tantek]Because we were inspired by similar projects like 24days
#[tantek]If you don’t want to bother you don’t have to, that’s ok too
#[tantek]Since you’re asking lots of historical questions, I’ll redirect you to viewing the history of the first IndieWeb challenge (2017 I think) and its edit history and the chat archives around the time of its creation
#jeremycherfasBad framing: it isn't a question of bothering. It is a question of whether and how I might be able to contribute, and you have already persuaded me that I am better off doing my own >7<101 days of challenge.
#[tantek]Great! Helping distinguish and better communicate these options will help folks choose what best works for them!
#[tantek]The other thing we have is 2020-01-01-commitments
#[tantek]I think “challenge” may be misimplying a “personal achievement” context to it (hence the more appropriate redirects to the commitments projects)
#[tantek][Rose] how does the word “community” provide sufficient meaning to indicate you are making something *for* others, rather than just implying do something to be a part of something (which is true, yet loses the desired focus)
#[Rose]My automatic understanding would be something done (together) for a collective. But that's me.