#@MitchWagnerEvery time I read up about IndieWeb get a headache. So confusing.
I get that regular people may never be interested in IndieWeb but the technology is downright hostile to people who don't already understand it. (twitter.com/_/status/1219854812545609733)
voxpelli, gRegorLove and [tantek] joined the channel; nickodd left the channel
#@kevinmarks↩️ Sorry to hear that. I'm very happy to talk about it here or at http://chat.indieweb.org
The basic idea is straightforward - have your own website and post things there.
The various specs are a our supporting that goal, and connecting personal sites to social media silos. (twitter.com/_/status/1219896483111227393)
#[tantek]KevinMarks++ for a kind reply and excellent summary
#LoqiKevinMarks has 6 karma in this channel over the last year (46 in all channels)
#[Rose]No, but reading that tweet and knowing what I know about Mitch, he's trying to find out how something like a reply works, and then getting stuck because he wants a few sentence summaries on what different parts of the "plumbing" are and how they work at a high level
#[tantek]so what he's really looking for is a developer introduction then
#[tantek]which is VERY different from "super simple introduction to the IndieWeb"
#[Rose]Something perhaps below a developer level intro and above a generic "what is the indieweb"
#[tantek]most people just want it to work, without hassle
#[Rose]But is there anything that "just works"? Or if they want something other that micro.blog?
#[tantek]and frankly do not care how it works. e.g. FB and Twitter users do not care at all how those work
#[Rose]I know I really struggled, and honestly am probably still missing good chunks on what different parts of everything are.
#[tantek]using micro.blog is the only "no struggle" option right now
#[tantek]so yes, any other path you choose will be a learning experience
#[Rose]I think a lot of people don't see micro.blog as the place for them necessarily, so this article would help fill the gap between "super simple intro" + use micro.blog and "figure it all out entirely by yourself"
#[tantek]I don't understand "don't see micro.blog as the place for them necessarily" - why?
#[tantek]do they have something against "micro.blog" the name, the brand, the service?
#[tantek]I don't think "other than x" is useful framing
#[Rose]They don't necessarily want the community aspect of it, or like the look and feel of it
#[tantek]There must be a specific reason otherwise it is not actionable
#[tantek]there must be a specific thing they *want*
#[tantek]the "not x" crowd will never be satisfied, and it's not useful to spend time designing for that
#[Rose]Personally I want more flexibility in many things than micro.blog offers/has offered in the past. But I don't know what others want, because I'm not them
#[tantek]right, so it's not helpful/useful to guess tat that (what others want)
#[tantek]"more flexibility" is a good start. more flexibility in what features?
#[Rose]Zapier integration and post templates are the two key ones nowadays.
#@ModernRetroMeI own all my content. You'll find everything I post to social media on my own blog. My social media accounts aren't really mine & can disappear tomorrow if the company wills. If you'd like to learn more about IndieWeb technologies, drop me a line. I'd love to share. #indieweb (twitter.com/_/status/1219903210900656131)
#[tantek]"When a variety of sites post my content" <- how are other sites posting *your* content?
#[Rose]I give it to them in exchange for payment. They post under my name, but on their schedule.
#[tantek]Do you post a copy of the content to your own site too? Or only a link?
#[Rose]I have a copy in another location, but I tend to open the opening paragraph and a link.
#[Rose]I could probably hook something up with MicroPub via REST on Zapier, but then things get complex much more quickly.
jeremych_ joined the channel
#jeremycherfasI'll just throw in the WithKnown is almost as easy as micro.blog and does not necessarily have the community aspect if you don't want it.
#[tantek]setting up an open source project is never "easy" by any non-expert measure
#[tantek]if withknown. com were still open to sign-ups, that would be a different discussion
#jeremycherfasWhich is why I used a modifier. Now, you and I may disagree on what exactly "almost as" means in practice, but I am certainly happy to describe it that way, particularly in light of what [Rose] and you said about "Something perhaps below a developer level intro and above a generic "what is the indieweb""
#jeremycherfasI could equally well point out that micro.blog is only "no struggle" if you have a credit card.
#[tantek]nope. any place you'd setup an open source project requires webhosting which requires a credit card, same with domain name
#[tantek]no setup of any open source project is "almost as" easy as a turnkey service, again, for non-experts/non-hobbyists
#[tantek]I admit this is presuming need to use a command line, which Withknown now requires since there are no longer any webhosts that let you flip a switch to get a withknown instance
#[tantek]Do you think we can improve that with our description on /chat ?
#[tantek]We really should do what we can to make the main #indieweb channel welcoming to anyone (per CoC) with any level of personal interest in their own site, even if they don't have one yet
#[Rose]Perhaps, but the nature of chat is that it flows by quite quickly, which is one reason I asked some time ago if there was a forum, it's easier to scan and see if there are topics that apply to you.
#[tantek]I'd be interested in seeing an example of that
[jgmac1106] joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]jermerycherfas if we can find someone to update the installatron script we can get Known back to a bit of of easier
#[tantek]like an actual good example, as all the ones I've dived into (e.g. Apple online support etc.) are next to useless
#[jgmac1106]Known is not easy in any way for most, anything that involves terminal can't fall in theat category
#[tantek][jgmac1106] that's what I mean, hence I'm trying to understand in what frame of reference could [jeremycherfas] consider withknown "almost as easy"
#[tantek]it's not easy understanding how it is "almost as easy" 😛
#jgmac1106i think he meant once set up everything just works, except now you have to do manual updates, just need to get the insllatron plugin fixed and every webhost will put Known back in cPanel
#jgmac1106I have talked to name.com and reclaimhosting.com about adding micro.blog butit isn’t LAMP so harder for most, not open source and they aren’t set up for a revenue share or freemium modwl
#jgmac1106might be something gwg and WP crew could look at as well, a fully packaged WP with all plugings ready to go that could be launched from a cPanel, pine.blog has been new and interesting to watch, mblaney and ihazawebsite ifs making progress
#jgmac1106Users I interact with the issue they have with micro.blog is not understanding how they build a homepgae and website from the splash page, they see it as JUST a community from first glance
#jeremycherfasI wonder what happened with zipperhost.com? Site is currently available. I seem to recall they were thinking about turnkey WithKnown.
#[jgmac1106]Reclaim will add it again but the installatron plugin needs to be installed, maintenance of mantaining launcher themsleves got to be too much after 0.9.2
#[jgmac1106]speaking of which they did a good job on their website redesign kinda of speaking to the "how it works" audience while not getting too jargony for john q. public
#Loqi[idno] installatron: Installatron scripts for use with Known.
#[tantek]The challenge of "how do I make a home page that represents me" vs. "how do I post on my stream" is kinda fascinating and I'm wondering if that's worth an #indieweb channel discussion
#[tantek]where micro.blog handles only the latter well (currently)
gRegorLove and jgmac1106 joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]it handles the "home page" stuff well, just hidden...once you have the phrase "easy writing with markdown" you are beyond 95% of users
#[jgmac1106]I think in the mitch case it is a user who has had a website for X number of years and wants to then add all the building blocks, support indieweb, collect and display webmentions....that is difficulut, I could never do it
#[jgmac1106]my 2020 goal is to spend the year trying to get webmentions to display on my site....really by Summit...but I will proably need the summer months
#jgmac1106rose, tantek had idea, we should use MDN for a clearer how to guide than the wiki. Get folks who use and built the specs to create docs for all the building blocks
gfgdfgdfg4, [LewisCowles] and strugee joined the channel
#[tantek][jgmac1106] where is irrelevant if you don't have good enough what. We can use MDN once we have stuff that's "good enough" on the wiki. The problem is not use MDN vs use IndieWeb wiki, the problem is actually writing the good accessible content.
#[tantek]There is nothing stopping you from writing "a clearer how to guide than the wiki" on the wiki, in your own User: pages etc.
#[tantek]That said, we should start adding stubs for how web developers can add support for these technologies to web sites. Not necessarily their own.
#[tantek]Adding the building blocks to an existing website is another interesting use-case. I do think that's firmly in column three however
[KevinMarks] joined the channel
#[KevinMarks]If we can find a way to work with good communicators like Mitch to do it as well
#[jgmac1106]Yeah I could never write to an audience like Mitch, I do need to swing back through the getting started page but..time...
strugee joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]Might just propose some gardening sessions at IWC but I like approach we took of porting mature content from micrformats.org to MDN
#[jgmac1106]A page for webmentions, IndieAuth, micropub, and microsub.... Where it is just documentation and not our text structure of IndieWeb examples, non examples, brainstorming, criticism
#[jgmac1106]I am happy to read and punch up technical content but should be written by people using tech.... Techincal writing is the most difficult genre.... Beyond honest reflection
#[jgmac1106][tantek] I also find major individual page rewrites noy too effective... Saw it happen with Get Started WP....there are like five versions but the live page doesn't change
#[tantek][jgmac1106] agreed on "whole cloth rewrites", and frankly, they're usually far too ego-centric, as if that one author has the magical empathy to understand the "real" perspective that is needed and no one previously did.
#[tantek]sometimes that may be the case, but we should recognize that's the exception, not the rule
#LoqiVisual representation, sketch notes from talks, building block logos, images, and slide deck templates you can use in your talks https://indieweb.org/diagram
#[Rose]Not a great page title I must say. I wouldn't expect a diagram to be on its own page 😄
#[tantek]^^^ does that answer your question of "what terms were important to start with"
#[tantek]agreed about page title etc., that's cleanup we can do
#[tantek]however is that the kind of diagram you mean? or something else?
#[Rose]I think that's kind of what I mean, but people looking for this kind of content might also be trying to compare it to terms they already know, such as RSS.
#[Rose]Not sure that "similar to known technology X" belongs on this page, but worth thinking about
#[tantek]there is a massive misunderstanding of "RSS" by people who think they already know it
#[tantek]the whole "why can't we just go back to RSS" crowd
#jeremycherfasThey're marginally more engaged than the whole "RSS is dead" crowd
#[Rose]The diagram is good, but I think we definitely need more spacing, and the steps listed out one after another with the diagram being built step by step would be good. And samples of "an app to log into uisng the IndieAuth" standard
#[tantek]jeremycherfas I feel there's a better chance of getting the "RSS is dead" crowd, because they're not wrong 😂
#[tantek]whereas the RSS nostalgists are out of touch
#[Rose]So "Janice logs into an app, such as Quill [link] using the IndieAuth [link] standard"
#[tantek]KevinMarks, lots of "curious" hobbyist types at Redecentralize conference
#[tantek]I'm wondering how to categorize the "curious" vs the "CMS user"
#[tantek]or is "curious" an adjective that could apply to a "service user", a "CMS user", or a "developer"?
#[tantek]are there non-curious developers? (they just want to get something coded, they don't really care how/why it actually works)
#[Rose]I would define curious as "has read the general description and is looking for more detail, but is not yet ready/willing/lacks the technical knowledge to read the developer docs"
#[Rose]Ignore CMS/developer/service titles for now.
#[tantek]I think it matters because each of those three approach curiosity differently
#[tantek]and are likely curious about different things
#[Rose]Possibly, but we could start with a generic "more detail than the simple intro we have" version, and then source opinions from those groups as to what it's missing and go from there
#tantek.comedited /environmental_impact (+263) "IndieWeb Examples: rhiaro's post counts as at least a documentation of her practices to reduce / minimize impact" (view diff)
#[tantek]Alright I put out a public call for indieweb examples of people publishing their personal environmental impacts, we'll see if anyone steps up!