#[tantek]Thanks gRegorLove. I'm seeing the "ONLINE: " pattern on https://events.indieweb.org/ so that's probably good to stick with and for location, "West Coast" is fine, better than a named timezone 😛
#gRegorLoveFeel free to rename and edit any description text
#[tantek]I figure it's your event so I'll leave renaming in your hands 🙂
#[tantek]Then I'll be happy to contribute to description text
#[tantek]FYI while IndieWeb wiki content and uploads are CC0, videos are being uploaded to the Internet Archive with a SA-BY-NC license
#[tantek]Typically this is because they have people in them, and we'd rather err on the side of caution with re-use of videos of people.
#[jgmac1106]that is smart, we should never assume how people's likeness should or could be used commercialy
#[jgmac1106]apologies I gave Ana wrong advice this morning
#aaronpktechnically if someone did want to republish a CC0 video that includes a person, they still need that person's permission, but i suspect most people don't know that and it's not worth the risk, so the more restrictive SA-BY-NC license makes more sense
#[jgmac1106]...I didn't know that...and I been doing CC for awhile...thx
#[jgmac1106]ahh okay I usually record a thumbs up folks are okay with the license I choose, but the restriction makes sense
#aaronpkno that's fine, i mean if someone took your video and wanted to republish it or edit it, they need to get their own permission release from the people in it, regardless of what copyright license it's under
#[jgmac1106]instead of having to note that on each wiki page with embedded videos we might want to put the video license in the footer
#aaronpkbut unless you explicitly say something like "and this will also let other people publish this video" then it doesn't include that
#aaronpkit's also the kind of thing that isn't a problem until it is
#aaronpkbut i don't want to empahsize the legal aspect of this too much anyway, because it's more about tantek's original point of we want to err on the side of caution
#sknebelNC had a few questions about what exactly is "commercial" (Although I think one of the bigger legal cases got resolved supporting the CC position)
#[fluffy]yeah NC’s got a lot of open questions when it comes to, for example, advertising-supported sites or whatever
#sknebelright, I think the one that was resolved was about paying someone to reproduce NC material, which was found fine
#[fluffy]ND does mean that the video file can’t be modified, which implies you can’t do things like transcoding it for bandwidth/quality purposes (or chunking it into an HLS stream) but otherwise I don’t think that prevents any usage in a playlist.