#meta 2021-02-03
2021-02-03 UTC
[KevinMarks], [schmarty], nertzy, [chrisaldrich] and [benatwork] joined the channel
# created /User:Liminalismo.com (+475) "Created page with "{{Infobox person |name = Izzy Rodriguez |url = https://liminalismo.com/ |photo_url = https://liminalismo.com/resources/images/sq_icon_hcard.jpg |pronouns = they/them, he/him |..."" ( view diff)
# created /Template:liminalismo (+141) "Created page with "<span class="h-card">
{{sparkline|https://liminalismo.com/resources/images/sq_icon_hcard.jpg}}
[[User:liminalismo.com| Izzy Rodríguez" target="_blank">User:liminalismo.com|" target="_blank">https://liminalismo.com/resources/images/sq_icon_hcard.jpg}}[[User:liminalismo.com| Izzy Rodríguez]]</span>"" ( view diff)[Emma_Humphries], [pfefferle] and [indieweb653] joined the channel
# A reminder, when talking about Decentralized Social Networks we can refer to at least three different things:
* Federated Social Web: Many Twitter like sites which can exchange messages
* IndieWeb: Every user has its own site
* Distributed Social Networks: Uses p2p, not HTTP ( twitter.com/_/status/1356910172183162883)
# ↩️ Mastodon as an example is a Federated Social Web solution whereas most new initiatives that I see are Distributed Social Networks (like @bluesky) and @indiewebcamp is probably the only IndieWeb style approach yet ( twitter.com/_/status/1356911990975975424)
# ↩️ I think the technologies of both ideas #IndieWeb and #Fediverse are solving the same issues, but the ideas behind them are different. The #Fediverse is a new paradigm that only works if everyone speaks the same protocol. ( twitter.com/_/status/1356913326123601920)
# ↩️ The #IndieWeb is more pragmatic and tries to work nicely with existing silos. I like what @t said once: “I don't care about federation, I care about my content, I care about my friends.” http://tantek.com/presentations/2014/06/indieweb/?full#care-content-friends ( twitter.com/_/status/1356914549002297345)
# ↩️ Personally my own site on the Fediverse is kinda like IndieWeb, because it's a single-user (me) site, heh. So that's another aspect of this, lines can be blurred a bit between these categories. ( twitter.com/_/status/1356919442773434379)
paul3, [pfefferle], [KevinMarks] and [schmarty] joined the channel
Saphire and beehiveth joined the channel
[Murray] joined the channel
[tantek] joined the channel
[arush] and [benatwork] joined the channel
# ↩️ I would say IndieWeb is an "idea" or a "philosophy" and it comes with some specs/protocols :) ( twitter.com/_/status/1357011531154784261)
# ↩️ Yeah, IndieWeb is an idea and some specifications has arisen from that idea: https://indieweb.org/ ( twitter.com/_/status/1357012293733806082)
[schmarty], [snarfed] and [Ana_Rodrigues] joined the channel
[Rose] joined the channel
# Thanks for those coming to #HomebrewWebsiteClub Nottingham (https://www.jvt.me/mf2/2021/02/n5ju5/) ( twitter.com/_/status/1357036692318924800)
[calumryan] joined the channel
lahacker, jamietanna and [KevinMarks] joined the channel
[benatwork] and [tantek] joined the channel
gRegorLove, [arush] and alex11 joined the channel
# ↩️ yeah, I think a good characterization (our team's thought about this more deeply than my abbreviated response) is that apps created on Glitch *can* be compatible with indieweb principles, and adding a domain to them is the shortest path to that. ( twitter.com/_/status/1357109946224156672)
[snarfed] joined the channel