samwilson, opal, lahacker, [chrisaldrich], petermolnar_, gRegorLove, justBull, nolith4, lanodan, nertzy, danyao, Salt[m], fredcy_, JackyAlcin[m], astralbijection[, jamietanna[m], ytqb[m], [chee], tweet[m], edsu and reed joined the channel
#petermolnarre sknebel "protected": You got me thinking. So I see two problems, both around indieweb(.org) & indiewebcamps. The first is, as terrible as it sounds, a trademark issue, but there the question is: would it be a problem is another entity shows up, organising indiewebcamps? If yes, or if we care, is there anything in place to "claim" indiewebcamps as ours?
#petermolnarThe other is the indieweb.org domain & wiki, but if I'm correct, the content on the wiki is CC0, so that's that, which leaves indieweb.org - it's not THE cornerstone of any of indieweb, but seemingly what happened to freenode is that someone sold the domain, and the whole shitshow is a result of that.
#sknebelgeneral sentiment was "effective protection is uselessly expensive, and generally if an organisation can be avoided that avoids lots of hassle"
#sknebelalthough "who has access to what in case of emergencies" etc probably is worth another look
#sknebel(general sentiment at the last organizers event where the topic came up, at least of the ones I took part in)
#sknebelre libera infra: matrix.org has announced that a bridge is in the works
[KevinMarks] joined the channel
#[KevinMarks]Name collision we have already seen with ind.ie