#meta 2021-07-26

2021-07-26 UTC
jeremycherfas, stevestreza and Saphire joined the channel
#
diggingthedigital.com edited /on_this_day (+274) "/* IndieWeb Examples */" (view diff)
[pfefferle] joined the channel
#
www.zylstra.org blog edited /on_this_day (+158) "/* Alan Levine */ added Ton's site as example" (view diff)
#
GWG I have to update that page as I spun my code out into its own plugin
justache, [jacky], rockorager, angelo, [schmarty] and [fluffy] joined the channel
#
@uchiuchibeke ↩️ You might want to consider this. https://indieweb.org/NASCAR_problem (twitter.com/_/status/1419754061495160832)
jeremycherfas joined the channel
#
[tantek] Would appreciate people's opinions on this https://github.blog/2021-07-22-minimum-viable-governance-lightweight-community-structure-foss-projects/ (via [KevinMarks])
#
[tantek] my tl;dr: I like the overall approach, very much missing a "core values" or "principles" or other mission/vision statement thing as a method of unifying a community beyond "the people that happen to show up" or "the people that have always made it work"
#
[tantek] absent explicit values / principles / mission / vision, it ends up strongly biasing towards giving more governance power to much more highly privileged folks
[aciccarello] joined the channel
#
[aciccarello] I agree it's important. I'm not sure that it fits github's vision of "minimum" or "viable" though. Also, considering the Drop ICE protesting I doubt GitHub wants to encourage principled software development.
rockorager, angelo and nertzy_ joined the channel
#
[tantek] yeah. governance without values/principles is not "viable" IMO.