#aaronpki'm on the fence about "web 2.0" and "web 3.0" but we can see how it goes
#[tantek]yeah, web 3.0 has so far been *only* defined in terms of plumbing, whether SemWeb or "decentralization" or blockchain so that seemed like a good signal that someone was thinking like a dev rather than like a user
#[tantek]I included Web 2.0 because it's largely a historical term at this point, and not really relevant to user-centric discussions (happy to be proven wrong on this)
#LoqiWeb 3.0 is a phrase used to pitch visionary sequels to the popularity of "Web 2.0" to advocate for particular plumbing solutions looking for problems, starting with the "Semantic Web" in the late 2000s, decentralization in the 2010s, and now mostly blockchains & cryptocurrencies; the IndieWeb instead focuses directly on user-centric goals, with technologies only as a means https://indieweb.org/Web_3.0
#[tantek]^ criticism, dissenting opinions welcome. started as a snarkinition but shifted to a factual description
#loqi.meedited /Web_3.0 (+57) "[tantek] added "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_3.0" to "See Also"" (view diff)
#tantek.comcreated /Semantic_Web (+17) "until someone bothers to split the RDF article and make a meaningful (semantic) distinction between the two" (view diff)
#[tantek]also kinda curious how often you [benatwork] have encountered the phrase "Web 3.0" in other contexts, and what people meant/assumed in those contexts
hans1963[d], kimberlyhirsh[d] and j12t joined the channel
#[tantek]snarfed, is there a way to lookup in IndieMap what the frequency (occurence/%) of various feed formats are among the *sites* crawled? E.g. which have home page feed discovery links to RSS2, Atom, JSONFeed, and "h-feed" on the home page?