#GWGIn the meantime, maybe I'll go focus on another problem
#[tantek]also there's over a month between now and the proposed date. I'm optimistic with current trends that it'll be close enough to 80%, and considering the demographic of folks attending (which has other issues, don't get me wrong), there's a high likelihood of much higher than 80% vaxed folks in actual attendance. Wouldn't surprise me if it was like 99% in practice.
#[tantek]E.g. social circles here in SF are like 99% for me, even though the city as a whole is "only" 82%
#[tantek]no news on a venue, Marc is still working on it
#GWG[tantek]: Do you have a site for a breakdown of California?
#[tantek]that's been in the papers a lot recently, let me see if I can find something, though as that's not really applicable to an upcoming IWC, I'll take it to #indieweb-chat
#[chrisaldrich]Uploading the photo for gardens and streams that we caught only at the very end... wish had remembered to do it after the intro session....
#[tantek]aaronpk, the IndieNews section seems to be missing article names from Tracy's website, which show up fine when parsed with pin13 for mf2
#[tantek]rather it says "a post" instead of the actual article name
#[chrisaldrich]I think it's because it's pulling data from IndieNews which got the bookmark from my site. Somehow IndieNews doesn't pull the original title from within my bookmark.
[fluffy], [fluffy]1, lanodan, justache, jbove_, Ramon[d], alex11, wackycity[d], willnorris, chee1, macaw, generating and synthesize joined the channel
#capjamesg[d]I like the idea of dividing by audience. What demographics would you suggest petermolnar?
#petermolnarI completely agree that "Why have your own website" and "Why Indie Web" are too washed together, and I'd like to propose of splitting them. "Why have your own website" != "Why Indie Web" - a website can be one's hub/home/portfolio without any indieweb building blocks.
#petermolnar(copy-paste with extras from -wordpress, where accidentally added these):
#petermolnarLooking at today's image/video centric feeds, that page also needs graphic examples for many points: eg. a collage of very different looking personal sites under the design/self-expression points that in high contrast with a social network profile.
#petermolnarAlso, things like "Identity and recognition", second sentence of "Better UI and UX", etc are essentially the same.
#petermolnarMaybe we could compose an alternative to /why, which separates website/indieweb, and on the next level (h3 to be specific) separates the bullet points/reasonings per audience? And by audience I mean more of what might be driving one, like urge of self-expression, a design challenge, wanting to learn, etc.
#petermolnar"audience" is not the perfect word to be honest: movitation might be closer
#petermolnarin 1999 my motivation was generic curiosity, then it became technical curiosity, and I've learnt so many things through having a web presence. Today it's more about wanting to have something I control and that actually looks the way I more or less want my site to look.
#petermolnarbut there must be so many more movitations; I'm just hoping we could group them in a reasonable manner, and have the headings based on that.
#capjamesg[d]Somewhat fortuitously, I have done technical writing in the past. I can take a crack at a new page over the weekend.
#jamesg.blogcreated /why_brainstorming (+2046) "Created page with "{{stub}} <span class="p-summary">'''<dfn>Why Brainstorming</dfn>''' is a page where we can brainstorm ideas for what content we should include on our /why page, a page of sig..."" (view diff)
#capjamesg[d]petermolnar I have just got us started ^ I'll revisit at the weekend.
#[KevinMarks]1I'd like to push back a little bit on this distinction -if you have your own website that is IndieWeb, so it's "why have your own site?" and "what extra features can indieweb help with?"
#[KevinMarks]1The indiewebify.me site is a good example of this, though may need some updating
#[KevinMarks]1IndieMark is a less good attempt, as it feels competitive and cliquey, though I'm sure it will appeal to some people
#capjamesg[d]At the moment I don't think that's clear on the /why page. We don't make a clear statement that says having any sort of site that you own makes you a part of the community.
#capjamesg[d]We make connections but we're not clear, especially to those who are not part of the community.
#capjamesg[d]"what extra features can indieweb help with?" is a great phrase.
#[KevinMarks]1maybe refactor indiewebify.me for specific goals rather than a single progression?
#capjamesg[d]I think the intent for indiewebify.me is different. That site appears to be more focused on actual IndieWeb goals which feels like a stage after you have decided that you actually want a site.
#LoqiJust generated this week's newsletter! You still have a few minutes to make changes, and I'll re-generate it 10 minutes before it gets sent out at 3pm Pacific time. https://indieweb.org/this-week/2021-10-01.html