#meta 2021-12-19
2021-12-19 UTC
# ↩️ Hi, original Technorati engineer here, which bit were you thinking of? The basic "who links to me?" is done by micropub in indieweb in a distributed way.
James has been building out indieweb search recently https://indieweb.org/IndieWeb_Search ( twitter.com/_/status/1472365489460551682)
balupton[d] and darkkirb joined the channel
Seirdy and nertzy joined the channel
# ↩️ The opposite tendency of web3 might be the IndieWeb movement, a thing I believe is deeply important but has proven to largely be a failure. These two approaches largely want to solve the same problems, but in very different ways: decentralization versus syndication. ( twitter.com/_/status/1472439226746740739)
# ↩️ the same engagement potential of a bunch of motivated people bought into what is effectively a Ponzi scheme. IndieWeb costs 25 bucks a month. Web3 might make you a billionaire. You can't win against that. ( twitter.com/_/status/1472440787086585859)
# ↩️ Both approaches are older than you think and fundamentally not ready for prime time, and may never be. I do think IndieWeb has a better shot, because it's just built with internet while web3 requires an additional layer of tech to function, but IndieWeb doesn't have that ( twitter.com/_/status/1472440376598450179)
RIZY101[d] joined the channel
# ↩️ I’m not competent to judge everything you have said, but I do know that it certainly does not cost $25 a month to have a site that makes use of IndieWeb principles and building blocks. Do you have specific examples in mind? ( twitter.com/_/status/1472472720050958341)
# ↩️ The point is the same though: IndieWeb will cost a little bit of money one way or the other, and it won't claim to pay you. ( twitter.com/_/status/1472478493384531970)
alex11 and darkkirb joined the channel
# ↩️ Смотрел. Но как в других IndieWeb-решениях я там вижу решение только технических вопросов, но редко видно развития социальных систем.
Соцсеть — это же ПО автоматизируещее соц. взаимодействия. Нельзя просто внедрить децентрализованный протокол. Надо и соц. задачу решить. ( twitter.com/_/status/1472533275755307008)
# ↩️ Большинство IndieWeb-решений — просто копия существующих соцсетей на другом тех. стеке.
Но какой смысл переходить, если в соц. плане они не говорят ничего нового и соц. задачу не решают лучше централизованных сетей? ( twitter.com/_/status/1472533540957003776)
corenominal[d] joined the channel
sayanarijit[d] joined the channel
alex11 and aparecidabosco32 joined the channel
# ↩️ You can get turnkey Indieweb at http://micro.blog for $5 a month. The bigger question is, what has payment to do with it? Not everybody who publishes online is looking for payment. Maybe some dislike being sharecroppers for the silos… https://stream.jeremycherfas.net/2021/mer_matthews-you-can-get-turnkey-indieweb-at ( twitter.com/_/status/1472614563644329997)
justSleigh joined the channel
# ↩️ Anyway. As I've stated many times in the past (including recently), I do think there are useful uses of blockchains in general. I just really do not like the way that "web3" is developing around them.
I'm much more interested in IndieWeb principles, personally. ( twitter.com/_/status/1472654746292916227)
# ↩️ Web Mentions/ ActivityPub - aside from this account I've mostly disappeared from social media the past 3 years. I believe in the indieweb, and I want to be the change I want to see, so I want to support these methods of independent publishing. ( twitter.com/_/status/1472672974327091202)
sarahd[d] joined the channel