#meta 2022-12-29

2022-12-29 UTC
#
[tantek]
^ I've seen a few people do that, use their domain for their template rather than their chatname. Is it something we should encourage or discourage?
#
M0x3b0b[m]
Hmm. Didn't even occur to me until you commented that I wasn't being consistent with the provided examples. The instructions say to "replace 'yourname' with your name or screen name", and I think my brain just subconsciously translated "screen name" to "username." Otherwise I probably would have spent at least half an hour trying to decide what I wanted to use.
gRegor and LonelyCat joined the channel
#
loqi.me
created /IndieWebTrain (+276) "prompted by [tantek] and dfn added by [tantek]"
(view diff)
#
loqi.me
edited /IndieWebTrain (+41) "[tantek] added "[[Category:hashtags]]" to "See Also""
(view diff)
#
loqi.me
created /Indie_Web_Train (+26) "prompted by [tantek] and redirect added by [tantek]"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
M0x3b0b[m], you already decided to use "M0x3b0b" as your screen name here in chat and perhaps that’s what’s unclear. We should say "chatname" and link it to make it unambiguous
#
GWG
It is nearly time for another HWC
#
loqi.me
created /chatname (+33) "prompted by [tantek] and redirect added by [tantek]"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /chat-name (+10) "r to section"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
^ M0x3b0b[m], documentation updated
#
tantek.com
edited /Template:sparkline/doc (+2) ""screen name" really means in effect "chat name""
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
I mean this edit ^ 🙂
#
GWG
[tantek]: Going to make an appearance tonight?
#
M0x3b0b[m]
[tantek]: Okay, if that's the intent, then yes, I'd say that's what I found unclear. Step Three is to add myself to chat-names, and Step Four is to set up the sparkline template...er...thing, but I didn't pick up on a connection between the two. My chat name is arguably more likely to change than any other relevant handles, because I might eventually decide the disadvantages that come from which bridge I'm talking through (such as
#
M0x3b0b[m]
the added "M...[m]") outweigh the satisfaction of using my own Matrix homeserver, but I do want to follow convention, so I'll go take a gander. Thanks. [Tantek]++
#
Loqi
[Tantek] has 17 karma in this channel over the last year (76 in all channels)
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-hwcs (+10) "update from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
by convention we tend to drop the chat network specific suffixes like [m] or [d] as well as the [ ] around Slack names
#
[tantek]
we haven’t had a collision yet, we’ll figure out what to do when we do
#
tantek.com
edited /2017/Nuremberg (+54) "IndieWebCamps section with template, more see also"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /2017/Düsseldorf (+56) "IndieWebCamps section with template, more see also"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /IndieWebTrain (+809) "extract SAs to posts about, add more SAs, add photos section"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /IndieWebTrain (+28) "dfn tweaks, found all known photos and posts about, no longer a stub"
(view diff)
gRegor joined the channel
#
tantek.com
edited /2022-12-indieweb-gift-calendar (+161) "today: HWC Pacific and [[IndieWebTrain]]"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /IndieWebTrain (+116) "+Riders"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /IndieWebTrain (+263) "+aaronpk photo, more riders"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /Twitter (+84) "finish blockquote"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /Twitter (-6) "move today's outage to Downtime section"
(view diff)
#
M0x3b0b[m]
<[tantek]> "by convention we tend to drop..." <- I was noticing that the [m] seems to keep the template from parsing. The chat names page says slack users should check the chat logs for the IRC version of their names, and I assumed that would also apply to Matrix, hence `M0x3b0b[m]` instead of `0x3b0b`, since not only am I coming from Matrix but IRC names can't start with a digit. So now I'm even less confident in where my template
#
M0x3b0b[m]
should be and I have a suspicion I've done my chatname wrong...someday maybe I'll stop making things unnecessarily difficult. I doubt it.
#
tantek.com
edited /Twitter (+457) "screenshot of today’s outage, subheads since section is so long now"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
your /chatnames entry should be what it shows up in IRC but without network suffixes or brackets
#
[tantek]
so yes, `M0x3b0b`
#
M0x3b0b[m]
Oh! I think I'd missed a trick.
#
M0x3b0b[m]
...maybe. Let me investigate.
#
[tantek]
you did something right because you do have an icon in Slack
#
Loqi
[preview] [M0x3b0b[m]] ...maybe. Let me investigate.
#
M0x3b0b[m]
I'd assume that's because I removed the `[m]` from my entry in the chat names page. The trick I'd missed is that I can actually also tell the bridge service bot what nick to use for me on the IRC bridge, separate from tweaking my Matrix display name. So I could replace that leading M with...something else valid. Like "bw3" or an underscore or something. Or even just go by "bw3" on IRC. The question, of course, is whether I want to.
#
[tantek]
sounds like extra work
#
[0x3b0b]
Accurate. But now I may have made things satisfyingly confusing instead of frustratingly confusing.
#
bw3.dev
created /Template:0x3b0b (+127) "Created page with "<span class="h-card" style="white-space:nowrap">{{sparkline| https://bw3.dev/static/noicon.png}} [[User:bw3.dev|0x3b0b]]</span>""
(view diff)
#
bw3.dev
deleted /Template:bw3.dev "incorrect understanding of convention"
#
tantek.com
created /🚆 (+27) "r"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /IndieWebTrain (+18) "emojicon"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /IndieWebTrain (+8) "push TOC"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /transit (+20) "SA IWT"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /IndieWebTrain (+53) "aaronpk's train post"
(view diff)
#
Loqi
[New Event] david.shanske.com created "Jan 4, 2023 6:00pm Homebrew Website Club - Pacific" https://events.indieweb.org/MKOZpT2yDqpU
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-hwcs (+153) "update from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /2022-12-indieweb-gift-calendar (+115) "27th highlight-js Firefox add-on"
(view diff)
#
tracydurnell.com
edited /blogging (+72) "/* Posts on Why to Blog */ add blogging guide"
(view diff)
#
cali.jamesg.blog
created /2022/Create/December (+1431) "Created page with " '''<dfn>IndieWeb Create Day</dfn>''' was an IndieWeb meetup on Zoom held on 2022-12-26. * https://events.indieweb.org/2022/12/indieweb-create-day-DWikudsEYbg3 * When: 2022-12-26 * Archived from: https://etherpad.indieweb.org/IWCCreateDay-2022-12-26 IndieWeb Create Day - 2022-12-26 == Participants == * {{gwg}} * {{j12t}} * {{tracydurnell}} * {{benji}} * {{angelo}} * {{capjamesg}} == Projects Being Worked On == * {{j12t}}: I'll be exploring wha...""
(view diff)
#
cali-iwc
Created https://indieweb.org/2022/Create/December. Please review the page to ensure the document is correctly formatted and remove any unnecessary text.
#
gregorlove.com
edited /Template:IndieWebCamp (+79) "+Create Day December"
(view diff)
mro, LonelyCat and barnaby joined the channel
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-hwcs (-176) "update from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /Template:next-hwc (+0) "update next date from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
mro, mambang, mro_, [Rick] and sp1ff joined the channel
#
aaronpk
interesting new trademark policy from mastodon, updated last week. now explicitly prohibits you from using "mastodon" or similar looking words in instance domain names https://www.joinmastodon.org/sl/trademark
gRegor joined the channel
#
IWDiscordRelay
<c​apjamesg#4492> Curious.
#
[tantek]
Does that mean there’s a legal entity for Mastodon that registered a tm? That’s the bigger news bc didn’t know there was an LE
#
barnaby
yep, Mastodon gGmbH
#
barnaby
a charitable limited company, effectively?
#
aaronpk
that was a while back
#
sknebel
Yep. Last year I think? Gargron transferred what previously was running on him personally to it
#
[tantek]
That’s worth noting explicitly along with the tm ownership & enforcement in /Mastodon, especially if folks know dates for these things
Seirdy0 joined the channel
#
[tantek]
following up on a #indieweb-dev conversation which strayed into #indieweb-meta topic: https://chat.indieweb.org/dev/2022-12-23#t1671759351324300
#
Loqi
[preview] [[tantek]] aaronpk, re: "way more opinions about the UX and UI of social media apps now" well it's good thing we focused on UX first and protocols second in this community then isn't it? And we captured plenty of screenshots of UX variants across silos and Indi...
#
Loqi
[preview] [[tantek]] There is no "social-media-pedia", indieweb.org is in effect the closest thing.
#
[tantek]
we already have good reasons to document social media sites for many IndieWeb use-cases, e.g. how to migrate from, how to POSSE to, how to export and leave etc., as well as UI/UX screenshots/patterns to consider as prior art when doing our own designs
#
[tantek]
what do folks think of making "in effect" be explicit as on topic for the wiki?
#
[tantek]
that is, if something is social media related either specific to a silo or in general, rather than trying to find which of many indieweb use-cases it fits in / overlaps with before documenting it on the appropriate wiki page, we explicitly say that in good faith if something is about or relevant to social media, it likely has some relevance, at least highly adjacent, to the IndieWeb, and thus is appropriate for the wiki?
#
[tantek]
thoughts?
#
[tantek]
or counterproposals?
#
[KevinMarks]
I think that makes sense for our wiki, as the socialwg one is a lot less maintained. It might be worth bringing some of those entries that assess different sites over
#
[tantek]
socialwg was much more focused on the specific chartered scope of socialwg, so that makes sense
#
[tantek]
and if a socialwg was restarted, it would have a different charter & scope accordingly, again for only a period of time (maybe 2 years, at least to start, perhaps longer with extensions)
#
IWDiscordRelay
<c​apjamesg#4492> Is there a world in which the WG would be rebooted?
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, there would have to be enough interest by W3C members to work on and put forth a new charter for a new WG
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, if you’re curious how that happens or how you can help make it happen, see: https://www.w3.org/Guide/process/charter.html
#
[tantek]
thanks [KevinMarks], sounds worth capturing somewhere as a brainstorm / proposal
#
tantek.com
edited /relevant_to_the_IndieWeb_wiki (+1621) "Brainstorming: Expand silos to social media in general"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, sknebel, barnaby, gRegor, GWG, others recently active here, please take a look and add your opinion: https://indieweb.org/relevant_to_the_IndieWeb_wiki#Expand_silos_to_social_media_in_general
#
tantek.com
edited /relevant_to_the_IndieWeb_wiki (+91) "/* Expand silos to social media in general */ add Counter arguments section"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
if we get rough consensus on this, seems like a good thing to "announce" in the new year
#
aaronpk
i feel like some of the pages already do that somewhat, so it's not a huge leap
#
[tantek]
yeah, that was part of the point, to take what seems to be beneficial (at worst harmless) practices of contribution to the wiki and make it explicit accordingly
#
tantek.com
edited /relevant_to_the_IndieWeb_wiki (+430) "/* Expand silos to social media in general */ lower barrier to relevant contributions, less labor for community contributors, linky"
(view diff)
gRegor and mro joined the channel
#
gRegor
[tantek] I'm not sure I fully understand the suggested change(s), but haven't really been following the conversation leading up to it
#
tantek.com
edited /relevant_to_the_IndieWeb_wiki (+358) "/* Expand silos to social media in general */ add an example change to make the proposal clearer"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
gRegor ^ that help?
#
gRegor
Ah, yeah that makes sense. Like aaronpk said, it does seem like some pages do that, so making this explicit sounds good.
#
gRegor
I mentally group social media as "silo" but also good to make that more clear, esp to newcomers
#
[tantek]
yeah, more clear to newcomers is one of the motivations for sure
#
[tantek]
in digging into the RSS/Atom podcasts question in #indieweb-dev, I found this note in the details of Atom's WP entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom_(web_standard)#Initial_work
#
[tantek]
In particular: "After releasing a project snapshot known as _Atom 0.2_ in early July 2003, discussion was shifted off the wiki."
#
[tantek]
Even though I was around and following at the time, and I remember the Pie/Atom wiki being kind of a mess (much more so than IndieWeb), I don't remember the reasoning or process by which "discussion was shifted off the wiki" which makes me wonder if that’s a vulnerability (from a community perspective) that we should be aware of
mro and LonelyCat joined the channel
#
tantek.com
edited /social_media (+702) "finish criticism add"
(view diff)
#
loqi.me
created /ActivityWeb (+426) "prompted by [tantek] and dfn added by [tantek]"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /ActivityWeb (+165) "add gh spec link"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /jokes (+15) "r--"
(view diff)
#
loqi.me
created /dead_sites (+23) "prompted by [tantek] and redirect added by [tantek]"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /ActivityWeb (+179) "sites"
(view diff)
#
loqi.me
edited /Converspace (+35) "[tantek] added "[[ActivityWeb]]" to "See Also""
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /lost_sites (+220) "/* Other Examples */ add the activity* domains, sort"
(view diff)
LonelyCat joined the channel