2023-01-17 UTC
# 00:03 [tantek] I'd say even one-offs are ok to add to the Previous IWC Cities section if they were non-trivial
# 00:04 [tantek] ^ that was only three cities and still the diff is non-trivial to follow
# 00:18 [tantek] looks like one city at a time in order to see sensible diffs
# 00:32 [tantek] gRegor ^ take a look, I think I handled everything non-trivial in comments. Should be cleaned up. Is this better than yesterday?
# 00:33 gRegor yeah I think the new sections makes it a lot easier to understand
# 00:36 [tantek] we can "age out" cities in "Restart a Recent City" every year if nothing is done about them (they become no longer "recent")
[Tim_Nolte], [timothy_chambe], gRegor, gRegorLove_, Alec and Guest6 joined the channel
# 16:08 GWG FYI, we didn't have a full online IWC in 2022
# 16:08 GWG So, any of them would be a restart
[schmarty] joined the channel
[aciccarello] and barnaby joined the channel
gRegor joined the channel
# 23:37 tantek.com edited /GitHub (+93) "move POSSE note to GitHub to a Brainstorming section so so far it is theoretical without anyone doing it yet, so we have no experience to indicate whether it works / is a good idea and should be recommended or not" (
view diff )
# 23:49 gRegor GWG, the online/virtual events have a separate section now so not under the same restart, past, etc. criteria