#meta 2024-05-23

2024-05-23 UTC
[tw2113] joined the channel
#
Loqi
[Event Updated] artlung.com updated "May 22, 2024 6:00pm Homebrew Website Club - Pacific" changed meeting_url https://events.indieweb.org/event/609/history/1725/diff
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-hwcs (+10) "update from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
#
GWG
I put it on the page
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-hwcs (-10) "update from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
to2ds joined the channel
#
[tantek]
GWG, I didn't see the Site Intros or Demos video links in the schedule grid the way the video links show up for the breakout sessions so I didn't see them
#
GWG
Odd, I thought I did
[jeremycherfas] joined the channel
#
[tantek]
amazing! digging guy screencap / poster image 😂
[Joschi_Kuphal] and gRegorLove_ joined the channel
#
tantek.com
edited /2024/Düsseldorf/Schedule (+134) "link demos session video"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
GWG, linked in the Sunday grid
[capjamesg] joined the channel
#
cali-iwc
Created https://indieweb.org/events/2024-05-22-hwc-pacific. Please review the page to ensure the document is correctly formatted and remove any unnecessary text.
#
cali.moe
created /events/2024-05-22-hwc-pacific (+2445) "Created event page using IndieWeb events / Etherpad archiver"
(view diff)
#
cali.moe
created /events/2024-05-22-hwc-europe (+6912) "Created event page using IndieWeb events / Etherpad archiver"
(view diff)
#
cali-iwc
Created https://indieweb.org/events/2024-05-22-hwc-europe. Please review the page to ensure the document is correctly formatted and remove any unnecessary text.
#
jamesg.blog
edited /events/2024-05-22-hwc-pacific (-211) "clean up formatting"
(view diff)
#
jamesg.blog
edited /events/2024-05-22-hwc-europe (-183) "clean up formatting"
(view diff)
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-hwcs (+10) "update from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
#
hamatti.org
edited /User:Hamatti.org (+188) "/* Entries */"
(view diff)
#
hamatti.org
edited /User:Hamatti.org (-133) "/* Indie Web Carnival */"
(view diff)
barnaby and khjkjh joined the channel
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-hwcs (-10) "update from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
jjuran joined the channel
#
cali-iwc
Created https://indieweb.org/events/2024-05-23-hwc-global. Please review the page to ensure the document is correctly formatted and remove any unnecessary text.
#
cali.moe
created /events/2024-05-23-hwc-global (+2551) "Created event page using IndieWeb events / Etherpad archiver"
(view diff)
#
jamesg.blog
edited /events/2024-05-23-hwc-global (-235) "Clean up formatting"
(view diff)
#
hamatti.org
edited /colophon (+77) "Add Juhis' colophon page to examples"
(view diff)
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-hwcs (-349) "update from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /Template:next-hwc (+0) "update next date from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
pcarrier, we can also discuss the dynamics of the different channels, and different networks/clients/services for accessing them here
[Murray] joined the channel
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, aaronpk, I tried ^
#
capjamesg
My most recent message: This is the problem pcarrier was trying to solve. We disable history and have a bot that auto-deletes messages that are older than n hours.
#
capjamesg
Except I meant to say _enable_ history.
#
aaronpk
the reason the channel is called `#indieweb-chat` is kind of incidental at this point, orignially the IRC channel was #indiewebcamp and we made the informal channel #indiechat
#
aaronpk
but then when we renamed the channels to use the #indieweb- prefix, the informal one became #indieweb-chat
#
aaronpk
which arguably was a mistake
#
aaronpk
i believe we have some discussions on the wiki about renaming it to be more clear
#
pcarrier
summary of my position: #indieweb-chat is usable in Slack and IRC but not Discord because there it keeps telling you there are messages there then not showing them to you, even if they're super fresh. We should move to removing messages after N seconds instead, which I offer to implement as a bot.
#
capjamesg
I am unsure why we are talking about names. The problem is we need an informal space that has some history. IRC and Slack both give you some history.
#
aaronpk
one problem with the name is it seems to be encouraging more conversation in the unlogged channel than is really appropriate
#
aaronpk
if less important conversation was happening there, the problem of disappearing chat would be less
#
capjamesg
aaronpk Snapchat chats disappear but there is a 24 hour period where you can still see them IIRC.
#
capjamesg
Snapchat arguably became popular because chats disappear, but there is still history.
#
capjamesg
Without any history, all context is lost in an interaction.
#
aaronpk
i am up for running a bot to help with this but i still think we need to move more conversation *out* of the channel in the first place
#
capjamesg
I agree. That, however, is a separate problem.
#
aaronpk
this is why i'm saying they are related problems
#
capjamesg
If the only thing anyone does in #indieweb-chat is say hello to each other and ask how their days are going, the channel is a success and valuable to the community.
#
capjamesg
I agree there is a relation between more messages and people feeling like they are missing out on information.
#
[tantek]
agreed with aaronpk that I believe the name of the channel is greatly contributing to the problem, especially for new people misunderstanding it
#
capjamesg
Honestly, I feel like I'm not being heard here [tantek].
#
[tantek]
at this point I'd be up for summarily making a new channel, like indieweb-random, that does have history turned on in discord that we can instead direct offtopic things to
#
capjamesg
Then people are going to ask what's the difference between #chat and #random 😄
#
[tantek]
since you cited the example of Slack random channel being there by default capjamesg
#
[tantek]
as aaronpk said, I think naming of indieweb-chat was a mistake in the first place
#
[tantek]
and all the frustrations shared are valid (from you capjamesg, and pcarrier) and I believe support the fact that that naming was a mistake
#
capjamesg
I am all for any outcome that: (i) allows people to have an environment where they can chat (important for community building), with limited history so the context of discussions are preserved, and; (ii) is not confusing to newcomers.
#
[tantek]
those are good considerations
#
[tantek]
I agree that informal chatter helps with community building capjamesg
#
capjamesg
I am happy for us to rename it, but only if we create a #random channel at the same time.
#
capjamesg
I'd appreciate others to weigh in, too! The more perspectives, the better!
#
aaronpk
weird i thought we had a section on /discuss with proposals for alternative names
#
aaronpk
like -offtopic vs -random for example
#
[tantek]
adding something now
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, those proposals were in an Organizers meeting/summit
#
[tantek]
around the time of the indieweb-* prefix change
#
capjamesg
NB: If we only rename the channel and do nothing else, I consider us to have failed in addressing the problem. It is essential we have a space where people can chat that is not logged on chat.indieweb., but that has history for context.
#
aaronpk
capjamesg: that's not what i'm saying
#
capjamesg
(I'm not saying anyone suggested that, but I wanted to be clear.)
#
capjamesg
aaronpk thanks! I just wanted to make sure my point got across.
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+1198) "/* other new channels */ propose #indieweb-random"
(view diff)
#
capjamesg
[tantek]++
#
Loqi
[tantek] has 23 karma in this channel over the last year (107 in all channels)
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, capjamesg, drafted off the top of my head and quoting from what folks have said (without attribution) https://indieweb.org/discuss#random_channel_for_informal
#
capjamesg
I agree with that proposal in full.
#
capjamesg
feels heard.
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+97) "/* random channel for informal */ Opinions?"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, added a spot for you to put your name to further be heard 🙂
#
[tantek]
"Opinions?" list at bottom of that section
#
aaronpk
[tantek]: to be clear, are you suggesting *only* creating a new channel right now, and not changing anything about the #indieweb-chat channel at the moment?
#
jamesg.blog
edited /discuss (+19) "/* random channel for informal */"
(view diff)
#
capjamesg
My only concern is that people not on Discord will still use #chat for everything because the behaviour there is functional, unlike in Discord.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, I commit to regularly using random 🙂
#
[tantek]
I will put my live streams there for example ☕
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, there may be some split/transition for a while, and I think that's ok
#
[tantek]
if enough of us use random to make it welcoming (and frankly, less intimidating, with fewer people), that will solve the problem of being more welcoming
#
aaronpk
i am also ok with treating this as a channel rename too
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, I'm ok with that but with a different name. there are some uses for "history disappears" that a bunch of us use -chat for that is a different use-case than what capjamesg is recognizing as more important
#
aaronpk
ah ok, in that case this proposal includes *also* logging it on chat.indieweb.org?
#
[tantek]
the nice thing with a new channel rather than a rename is that we get to be explicit about setting the new culture of the new channel
#
capjamesg
We shouldn't log random to chat.indieweb.org.
#
capjamesg
That's a very public space.
#
[tantek]
no logging, just added discord history
#
aaronpk
so also no joining it from the web client
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, different levels of "publics"
#
[tantek]
yes, no joining random from web client
#
[tantek]
I will add those details now
#
capjamesg
[tantek] You used publics before I had the chance 😄
#
aaronpk
just trying to be very clear about what infrastructure to create here
#
capjamesg
I have never used the word.
#
cophee
I think it's a good discussion to have about #indieweb-chat
#
cophee
I think from a perspective of someone non-technical, Discord or Slack would probably be used over IRC (if they're <25)
#
IWDiscord
<c​ophee>
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+152) "/* random channel for informal */ more details, not archived nor available on web UI"
(view diff)
#
cophee
I was initially a bit confused about the channel as well like capjamesg[d] mentioned earlier
#
[tantek]
aaronpk++ for trying to be very clear
#
Loqi
aaronpk has 44 karma in this channel over the last year (135 in all channels)
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, added those details to the proposal, good questions
#
cophee
I think I remember when I first joined I thought I was lacking permissions on Discord to see the chat history
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /discuss (+17) "/* random channel for informal */"
(view diff)
#
pcarrier
do we agree to move to a bot that removes messages older than X in Discord, to roughly match Slack?
#
pcarrier
FWIW I have such a bot ready to roll
#
aaronpk
not for the new "random" channel
#
cophee
pcarrier[d]: so speedy
#
pcarrier
what's going to be discord's behaviour for this random channel?
#
aaronpk
persistent like the others
#
aaronpk
but i would like to also propose we deprecate the "chat" channel, and make a new "off the record" channel (name tbd) that has the rolling delete bot in discord
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, sounds like a good proposal. we could call it indieweb-snap. or perhaps indieweb-story 😉
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, cophee WDYT? 😆
#
[tantek]
digs for the prior conversation
#
capjamesg
indieweb-snap reminds me of the game Snap.
#
capjamesg
I'm all in for a game of Snap if anyone wants to play 😂
#
pcarrier
I'm very much down for some https://teeko.cc
#
cophee
aaronpk: maybe indieweb-vanishing
#
aaronpk
hahaha nobody supported renaming it to indieweb-chat in the first place 😂
#
aaronpk
look at the discussion in that wiki page
#
Loqi
hahahaha
#
cophee
[tantek]: i am working on my website!!
#
cophee
but also procrastinating sleep
#
pcarrier
well, the bot will be ready whenever. I can run it on my server if you'd like to authorize it
#
capjamesg
pcarrier[d]++
#
Loqi
pcarrier[d] has 2 karma in this channel over the last year (11 in all channels)
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, that's what I meant by accident/default in the proposal (as to why indieweb-chat happened 😂 )
#
toddpresta.com
edited /100_days (+17) "/* 100 Posts of IndieWeb */"
(view diff)
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /discuss (+1507) "/* other new channels */"
(view diff)
[KevinMarks] joined the channel
#
www.ciccarello.me
edited /rename_to_IndieWeb (+115) "/* non-log based IRC chat stuff */ added votes"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
oh dear do we need expiration dates on polls? 😂
to2ds joined the channel
#
[tantek]
I mean the page does say at the top: "Renamed to IndieWeb was a" and references 2016 🙂
[aciccarello] joined the channel
#
[aciccarello]
Ha, I figured the discussion was getting re-hashed. Happy to re-vote elsewhere
#
[tantek]
I think aaronpk wrote up an updated proposal
#
gRegor
The brainstorming section has other current chat channel discussions
[schmarty] joined the channel
#
[schmarty]
submitted my application for XOXO :crossed_fingers::skin-tone-2:
#
aaronpk
i just added the "off the record" proposal
#
aaronpk
ok let's make the call on this new "random" channel today tho
#
gRegor
I'm behind on the proposals, today is first I heard of random :)
#
[tantek]
gRegor, nope, you're fully up to date, random was (re?)proposed today
#
martymcgui.re
edited /discuss (+237) "/* off the record channel */ +me; make the section a title for slightly easier voting"
(view diff)
#
gRegor
What's the proposed length of persistence for random? It seems similar to the offtherecord proposal, just not a specific length specified
#
pcarrier
I'd be happy with anything >1h
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+575) "/* Name ideas */ a few more ;)"
(view diff)
#
gRegor
oh no XD
#
pcarrier
random + off-the-record feels overkill to me
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+330) "/* Name ideas */ moar: breeze, raindrops, vibes"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
pcarrier - nope, totally different use-cases
#
[tantek]
capjamesg++ for clearly stating the gentle community onboarding advantages of having something informal, whether or not it is on/off topic
#
Loqi
capjamesg has 28 karma in this channel over the last year (196 in all channels)
#
gRegor
I don't quite understand the different use-cases of those two then
#
[tantek]
ironically, we discussed that in #indieweb-chat 😂 😭
#
gRegor
Especially since the otr section starts out with "The problems with the "chat" channel are documented above in the proposal for the "random" channel."
#
gRegor
it reads like otr has more concrete limits, the 90d limit specified, etc. vs random saying "with limited history"
#
pcarrier
(I strongly suspect Discord bots can't delete messages after 2 weeks, so 90 days can't be matched)
#
aaronpk
wait where does it say "with limited history"? that sounds incorrect
#
[tantek]
should we have a culture of, if someone does say something on-topic in the random channel, it's ok to quote them on the wiki?
#
[tantek]
yeah we should so no guarantee of any history or logs
#
[tantek]
as opposed to committing to some specific history, because we can't do that across clients/services
#
[tantek]
time to sort the naming proposals 😛
#
gregorlove.com
edited /discuss (+70) "/* Name ideas */ vote"
(view diff)
#
pcarrier
what's the "EH community"?
#
[tantek]
context?
#
pcarrier.com
edited /discuss (+18) "/* random channel for informal */ +1 pcarrier"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+8) "/* Name ideas */ sort, put double breaks between items for easier viewing when editing to make sure you don't miss one"
(view diff)
#
pcarrier
[edit] [tantek] https://indieweb.org/discuss refers to it
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+70) "/* random channel for informal */ majority was against indieweb-chat. oops. citation"
(view diff)
#
pcarrier
> While the new "random" channel isn't logged to the web archives, it is still persistent in discord and slack
#
pcarrier
Feels like a weird in-between to me.
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+284) "/* Name ideas */ -1 offtopic, violates fun principle, similarly offtherecord - so legalistic, much corpo"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
thank you pcarrier, will expand momentarily
#
pcarrier
tantek++
#
Loqi
tantek has 24 karma in this channel over the last year (108 in all channels)
#
[tantek]
weird in-between topics are totally ok for a "random" channel 😂
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+15) "/* events meetups channel */ expand first use of EH abbr for readability"
(view diff)
#
gRegor
Not to add another option in the mix... but a more generic version of the -espresso option could be indieweb-cafe. Chill vibes, socializing, etc.
#
gRegor
Lots of people on laptops, haah
#
[tantek]
gRegor is appealing to the choir 😂
#
pcarrier
I guess what I'm saying is that I don't see the point of having 3 setups, fully persistent vs persistent in 2 places vs not persistent…
#
[tantek]
pcarrier, do not mistake characteristics for the use-cases
#
pcarrier
what's random not for?
#
[tantek]
I asked above one possible distinguishing thing
#
[tantek]
I think it should/could be ok to quote from random even though it is not archived
#
gRegor
ahh, I missed that distinction
#
pcarrier
ok, that does introduce a difference. I stand by "weird in-between". it's not persistent except in 2 places anybody can join and the web if someone else decides to… might as well be persistent then.
#
[tantek]
there's always going to be weird differences across clients/services. we can't hope to address/solve all of them
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+183) "/* random channel for informal */ it should/could be ok to quote from random even though it is not archived"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
ok I'm adding -cafe gRegor++
#
Loqi
gRegor has 56 karma in this channel over the last year (131 in all channels)
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+667) "/* Name ideas */ #indieweb-cafe from gRegor, and indieweb-chill inspired by that"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
also added -chill because of what someone said
[snarfed] joined the channel
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+149) "/* Name ideas */ more on *-chill"
(view diff)
#
aaronpk
these all sound like great alternatives to "random", is that where you meant to add them?
#
[tantek]
there we go folks, let's see your vibes on the various proposals for https://indieweb.org/discuss#off_the_record_channel
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, nope, these are specifically for off the record, see the description of indieweb-chill for example
#
[tantek]
or raindrops, or espresso, or cafe. all of them imply non-persistence and non-quoting
#
[tantek]
and little if any guarantee of any history
#
gregorlove.com
edited /discuss (+52) "/* Name ideas */ vote"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
going to lobby for cafe now
#
[tantek]
[Joe_Crawford] [Al_Abut] since you are fans of Black Market Cafe, perhaps consider voting for indieweb-cafe in https://indieweb.org/discuss#off_the_record_channel
#
aaronpk
how about lobby for "lobby" while you're at it 🙃
#
[tantek]
since lobbying about channels is chat about channels, we're good with #indieweb-meta for that 😄
#
[tantek]
though since you sounded half-joking, there are other slacks/discords that have an introductions channel for newcomers
#
[tantek]
explicitly to feel welcome to introduce themselves
#
[tantek]
though I'd prefer to encourage introductions in #indieweb
#
aaronpk
yeah i don't think we need to separate that
#
[tantek]
ok I'll add it explicitly to the description to make it clear it is ok to do so
#
aaronpk
i feel like those channels that i've seen end up being weird ghost towns because people jhust say hi and then feel weird starting a conversation in the channel to avoid clobbering other people's intros
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (+132) "/* indieweb */ expand to include introductions explicitly being ok and welcome, and what you want to do with your personal site"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
agreed aaronpk. ok done, #indieweb is now explicitly welcoming of introductions and discussions of what people want to do with their personal sites
#
capjamesg
That's the behaviour we encourage on Discord ^
#
capjamesg
#indieweb is mentioned as the first place you should go in the onboarding flow.
#
[tantek]
beautiful
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, is there anything else like that in the Discord channel descriptions that we should explicitly add to https://indieweb.org/discuss#Chat_Channels_Purposes ?
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, btw I support flipping on indieweb-random as proposed if no objections within 24hrs, without making that dependent on doing something with *-chat or the off the record proposal. Let's not introduce artificial dependencies that act as stop energy
#
aaronpk
agreed
#
capjamesg
[tantek] Here is the page someone sees when signing up:
#
[tantek]
these are great! capjamesg if you want to try copyediting the #indieweb description that I linked to in the wiki to be similar, please go for it
#
gRegor
Is the goal for -random to *eventually* replace -chat? Still not clear on the use-case and the "with limited history" I mentioned before
#
aaronpk
sorry where are you seeing "with limited history"?
#
[tantek]
ditched limited history, reload
#
[tantek]
gRegor, the problem is -chat tried to address too many use-cases, is doing so badly, and is confusing for discord
#
[tantek]
nothing is a pure "replace" for -chat
#
gRegor
Now it says "has at least some history" XD
#
[tantek]
that's why we went back to the use-cases that matter
#
gRegor
Re-reading after refresh
#
[tantek]
and then recreated what we want
#
artlung.com
edited /GitHub (+664) "/* changes to GitHub section on available syndication feeds */"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
instead of being saddled with the framing of what we literally voted against (indieweb-chat) as cited
#
aaronpk
haha well "has at least some history" is at least accurate
#
aaronpk
`history > 0` rather than `history <= N`
#
gRegor
It seems to function like -chat now, but a different name, part of my confusion
#
gRegor
I'm likely to just keep talking in -chat if they both exist at the same time
#
[tantek]
gRegor, one non-trivial difference, ok to quote from -random, whereas not from -chat
#
[tantek]
but yes, I will likely keep using both as well, for different reasons!
#
gRegor
Got that, though I thought most of the motivation for this conversation was "people in Discord have a bad experience with no history"
#
[tantek]
no that was perhaps the original "problem", but the motivation is documented as the 3 points in "We need a channel that:" https://indieweb.org/discuss#random_channel_for_informal
#
[tantek]
*positive* constructive motivation, rather than negative avoid bad experience motivation.
#
aaronpk
also this channel *will* have history in discord
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, since "this channel" could refer to where you're actually chatting (#indieweb-meta), disambig 🙂
#
aaronpk
the new "random" channel will have history in discord
#
aaronpk
since that was only kind of implied in the proposal i will make it explicit
#
[tantek]
will have at least some history in discord, no guarantees for how much
#
[tantek]
it is explicit!
#
gRegor
Not to me
#
pcarrier
I like low history channels
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /discuss (+94) "/* random channel for informal */"
(view diff)
#
gRegor
Those three bullet points describe -chat currently to my reading. Sorry, not sure what I'm missing, but clearly am missing something. I'm not saying this to be anti the random channel either :)
#
aaronpk
-chat currently has *no* history in discord, not "at least some"
#
[tantek]
gRegor, it is explicit for the new random channel "has at least some history so the context"
#
gRegor
Gotcha
#
tantek.com
edited /discuss (-23) "/* random channel for informal */ since folks are clear that this is part of the proposal: it is ok to quote from random"
(view diff)
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /discuss (+9) "/* random channel for informal */ clarify not "publicly archived" since it is archived in slack, discord, and anyone's personal IRC clients"
(view diff)
#
gregorlove.com
edited /discuss (+329) "/* random channel for informal */ vote/thoughts"
(view diff)
#
Loqi
[Event Updated] artlung.com updated "May 23, 2024 12:00pm Front End Study Hall #003" changed meeting_url https://events.indieweb.org/event/607/history/1726/diff
#
www.ciccarello.me
edited /discuss (+647) "/* off the record channel */ aciccarello votes"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
aciccarello++ for good comments
#
Loqi
aciccarello has 12 karma in this channel over the last year (30 in all channels)
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /discuss (+128) "/* Name ideas */ revise my votes"
(view diff)
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /discuss (+113) "/* off the record channel */"
(view diff)
#
www.vzqk50.com
created /chipotle (+744) "Created page"
(view diff)
#
aaronpk
chipotle << /fun
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /lulz (+15) "/* Local */"
(view diff)
#
www.vzqk50.com
edited /page (+15) "Add link to Chipotle page"
(view diff)
#
aaronpk
pretty solid wiki page tbh
#
tantek.com
edited /chipotle (+12) "lowercase per actual path usage"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /chipotle (+169) "actual Why use-case"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
yeah I'm going to have think about /tacobell
#
tantek.com
edited /chipotle (+36) "historical example of when to send someone to get you Chipotle"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
^ there's the silo connection
#
tantek.com
edited /chipotle (+18) "addyourself"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /chipotle (+19) "🌯 until there's a /burrito page instead"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
created /🌯 (+22) "🌯 until there's a /burrito page instead"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /chipotle (+11) "dfn markup helps"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /chipotle (+23) "expand history"
(view diff)
[Joe_Crawford] joined the channel
#
tantek.com
edited /chipotle (+39) "link History from header summary"
(view diff)
barnaby joined the channel
#
Loqi
[New Event] artlung.com created "Jun 6, 2024 12:00pm Front End Study Hall #004" https://events.indieweb.org/DVYPvvZYYlHT
[Ros] and barnaby joined the channel
#
marksuth.dev
edited /Homebrew_Website_Club (-5) "/* London Europe Online */"
(view diff)
#
marksuth.dev
edited /Homebrew_Website_Club (+24) "/* Europe/London Online */"
(view diff)
[Jo] joined the channel
#
Loqi
[github] Successfully deployed aaronpk/indielogin.com to https://indielogin.com
jeremycherfas and [tantek] joined the channel