2024-09-16 UTC
# 00:14 aaronpk at one point i was looking into the zoom api to see if I could bridge the zoom meeting chat with the chat here
# 00:14 aaronpk now that we have the events channel, maybe I should revisit that? any thoughts?
# 00:53 [tantek] aaronpk whoa, the chat in Zoom has an API?!? That would be surreal for it to be bridged (bidirectional I assume?) with the events channel, at least maybe the main (Red?) zoom room
Dryusdan joined the channel
# 01:52 [tantek] well that's going to be this week's top page, most likely
# 02:50 catgirlin.space [tantek]: ~~is that a challenge~~
jacky joined the channel
# 03:25 [tantek] More wiki gardening is absolutely welcome. Check out /to-do for some of the pages that need updating
# 03:27 jacky does #indieweb-chat require a invite now? (on IRC; from main chan)
# 03:27 [tantek] aaronpk did we leave indie-chat on IRC alone or was it blocked? I think it's better to let it be and folks who want to only be on IRC there for legacy reasons can stay
# 03:29 jacky flipped it to this b/c Slack was really resource heavy
# 03:30 aaronpk I made it so nobody can join anymore, but left everyone in the channel
# 03:31 aaronpk I figure it's weirder if IRC folks are still able to use it because there's no indication it's *not* bridged anymore so you'd never know
# 03:34 catgirlin.space wait the irc people get to have a secret chat room??
# 03:36 jacky nah, it makes sense (the UX effectively is the same)
# 03:46 jacky well not let it go, lol but the UX of requiring an invite to a unlogged channel makes sense
# 03:47 aaronpk What I didn't want to do is to redirect the channel
jacky joined the channel; jacky left the channel
# 03:51 catgirlin.space secret channel for the cool discord server members when,,,,,
# 03:52 aaronpk see this is why i am trying to kill the channel ^^
epoch, [manton]1 and AramZS joined the channel
# 14:04 [tantek] Ok folks, I've gotten a venue for IndieWebCamp Berlin and am working out the funding. Should have an answer / hopefully confirmation in a day or two.
# 14:04 [tantek] If you're excited about IWC Berlin in November, join me in #indieweb-events and let's keep chatting about it!
[schmarty] joined the channel
# 14:08 Loqi tantek has 36 karma in this channel over the last year (122 in all channels)
[Jo] and [capjamesg] joined the channel
[Joschi_Kuphal] and barnaby joined the channel
# 14:41 aaronpk pcarrier[d] i think the bot doesn't like my really large integer
# 14:42 aaronpk it deletes messages instantly once i set it to 90 days
# 14:43 aaronpk i just modified the code to divide the timestamps by 1000 and i think it's working now
# 14:49 pcarrier interesting, would have multiplied the other side by 1000 instead
# 14:50 aaronpk well i didn't like defining the timeout in milliseconds in the config file anyway
# 14:53 pcarrier if ((Date.now()/1000) - (date.getTime()/1000) > msgTimeout) => if (Date.now() - date.getTime() > 1000 * msgTimeout)
# 14:53 pcarrier ^ that's what I meant by "multiply the other side by 1000 instead" :)
# 14:55 aaronpk will that work tho? my assumption was that 7776000000 was causing the problem, so i made the numbers all smaller
# 14:58 aaronpk well it didn't immediately delete the messages this time
# 15:04 aaronpk and if you give it a bigger value it runs immediately
# 15:06 aaronpk i'm tempted to rewrite this as a php script that runs on a cron job, heh
# 15:08 Loqi PHP has 2 karma in this channel over the last year (3 in all channels)
# 15:08 aaronpk if we were doing a much shorter threshold the setTimeout and websockets is cute, but it's really not necessary for a 90 day interval
# 15:18 aaronpk ok well you had some good retry and paging logic in there so i just ripped out the websockets and timeouts and turned this into a cron job instead
# 15:37 [mattl] Hmm now I wonder if I can somehow sync all GitHub issues assigned to me to my own website and therefore to OmniFocus
# 15:37 Loqi PHP has 3 karma in this channel over the last year (4 in all channels)
# 15:42 pcarrier [aaronpk]: well the original idea is to delete as we go stuff more than X old, not every X
# 15:42 aaronpk right, delete messages older than 90 days every day
[aciccarello] and gRegor joined the channel
# 17:22 pcarrier 90 days seem on the long side, is it to mirror slack or because we want that long? I'd personally be happy with 1-7 days
# 17:35 aaronpk it's to mirror slack, at least until we write a similar bot for slack
# 17:35 aaronpk but anyway it's deployed now as a daily cron using the deno script
# 17:49 catgirlin.space 7 days does sound nice
# 17:52 aaronpk longer than conversations linger in a physical cafe but i think that's fine :)
jjuran and sp1ff` joined the channel
# 19:54 catgirlin.space capjamesg[d] #overview links to a non-existant channel now (at the bottom abt chat logs)
# 20:01 catgirlin.space hi loqi
# 20:09 tantek.com edited /capability_URL (+189) "/* See Also */ W3C has three different versions/links for this for some reason, whereas TR should at least have the most recent published draft, and the Editor's draft should be labeled as such, not Draft" (
view diff )
[fluffy] and vroman joined the channel
# 23:21 jacky [fluffy]: I, for one, am curious and interested in your ideas and approaches for the "IndieWeb hub"
vroman and [KevinMarks] joined the channel