Loqi"About" is a commonly occurring page or section on a site that describes who is behind the site and a summary or the purpose of the site https://indieweb.org/about_page
[artlung][tantek] no objection. It’s about what folks do. I’m just out of the ocean but I remember a blogger who started all their posts with quotes but can't remember which blog
Loqipage is short for a web page on the IndieWeb, and is usually primarily known by its name (AKA named page), served at the top level of a site (AKA slash page), and kept updated in place in contrast to posts which are primarily datetime-based; a page that is browser-editable with viewable revisions is a wiki-page https://indieweb.org/slash_pages
Loqiquotes is a page or section for listing quotes you like and several community members have pages that list their favourite quotes on their websites https://indieweb.org/quotes
[morgan]I wanted to suggest/ask about providing some extra clarification and guidance about topics for the chat/expectation setting we do for people. Ive come from many groups where the norms were a bit different, many took a sort of "broom if you stay too long" approach where things kind of evolve and then if a topic drags on it gets ushered elsewhere but there was not an expectation that things would always be in the right channel. In some
[morgan]self-introspective post, when I have specific reasons why I dont want to blog it yet or put it on my website, and my intent was that it was engage-able worthy post in the chat. I just think that there is some nuance here thats maybe not communicated as well as it could be, and leads to some grizzled feeling. Like to be clear, I got some feedback in #indieweb-cafe that I had posted many times about a topic (being without a phone, its alas
[morgan]really affected my life), and I can recognize that it was getting tired and worn out-> but it wasnt actually helpful to suggest putting it on my website either.
[morgan]concrete ways the indieweb approach seems more like, disciplined, and its longevity and stability is a testament to that. I actually had to re-read and remind myself of the http://indieweb.org description of the chat versus posting on your own website being preferred. The main thing that Ive encountered a few times is suggestions to put things on my website as a more productive way than anything framed as a self reflection or
[schmarty]hey morgan. sorry to hear about the grizzled feelings. one phrase that jumped out at me in your suggestion/question above was "engage-able worthy post in the chat". to me that sounds a little bit like posting in chat for the purpose of "getting engagement". i have a lot of thoughts on this that probably don't fit in a chat box here. but i guess i would say, even in more "catchall" channels like -cafe and -random, repeatedly bringing up a
[schmarty]topic dominates discussion. ideally, i think, repeated discussions should "veer towards" "indieweb relevance" or they can become more a distraction than a contribution.
gRegorI wonder if a discussion forum like the indieweb forum might be a better place for some of that. It sounds like you don't necessarily want it to be public, though, so that may not be a great option.
LoqiIndieWebForum is an experimental place for people to ask questions and start discussions at a slower pace than in chat https://indieweb.org/indieweb_forum
LoqiJust generated this week's newsletter! You still have a few minutes to make changes, and I'll re-generate it 10 minutes before it gets sent out at 3pm Pacific time. https://indieweb.org/this-week/2026-02-27.html
tantek.comedited /2026/Düsseldorf (+93) "move directions further below after other things people should read before participating and such" (view diff)
tantek.comedited /2026/Düsseldorf (+154) "/* Breakfast and Coffee */ note near the venue, move previous cafe which was near last year's venue to previously" (view diff)
artlung.comedited /wish (+274) "/* Silo Examples */ adding note about Amazon wishlist privacy change starting March 2026 whereby home addresses may be revealed." (view diff)