2015-05-18 UTC
KevinMarks, Atamido, KevinMarks__, fuzzyhorns, gRegorLove, KartikPrabhu, tantek, eschnou, KevinMarks___, Left_Turn, kez, ChiefRA, chiui, adactio, tommorris, csarven, glennjones, pfefferle and Garbee joined the channel
# 12:25 glennjones I am also going to write a way to tests each of the current parsers against the test suite, matching the test suite JSON output against the parser’s output
gjones joined the channel
tantek and pfefferle joined the channel
charl, glennjones and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# 16:01 Vendan glennjones, I'm all in favor of that, just let me know when you start getting the tests up so I can play with them :)
# 16:02 Vendan I'm using a strict comparison, but that means extra data, like the rel-urls stuff, then gets marked as a failure
# 16:02 aaronpk can this be turned into a test quite that can run on jenkins?
# 16:03 Vendan I'm already running my tests on travis-ci, so I don't see why not
# 16:04 Vendan fun bit is if you want to combine all the parsers into one repo and test them all at the same time
# 16:04 Vendan cause then you'd need node and python and php and such
# 16:04 glennjones I did use travis-ci for my test, but I pull a copy into my parser project to get to work
# 16:06 Vendan I use submodules to pull the test stuff into my parser, so I'd most likely just change that to point to the new tests
# 16:07 glennjones I am looking at doing test-rig that compares parsers by sending html to web based APIs that take HTML strings and then diff the output
# 16:08 Vendan I'm assuming you'd like something that's just post html to it and get back the json as the response body?
# 16:09 Vendan what would the post be, a file upload type thing or a form encoded or just html as the request body(just curious so I can go implement it)
# 16:12 aaronpk that'd be great, let me know if you need me to do anything for the php one
# 16:13 aaronpk i could even set up a separate path that auto-updates from github master so it's always running the latest
# 16:13 aaronpk yes, definitely need to be able to pass in the base URL for tests
# 16:13 Vendan so do we want to go with "html" and "url" fields, form encoded?
elf-pavlik_ joined the channel
# 16:21 Vendan tbh, I like the way mine displays back on the same page, so you can tweak and test again easily, but I'm adding a version like that
# 16:23 Vendan no, just posting to the page, what's returned is the form with what you posted and the parsed output below it
# 16:23 aaronpk makes it not really an API, but I see what you mean
KevinMarks joined the channel
KevinMarks___ joined the channel
# 16:29 Vendan and as I've said, I like to test from the ide, so if I can just pull down the input and expected output, that'd be awesome
KevinMarks, KevinMarks__, eschnou, elf-pavlik, csarven, tantek, KartikPrabhu and hectorMcSpector joined the channel
tantek and eschnou joined the channel
# 21:44 Vendan I'm kinda liking the idea of a "h-project" vocab, with the idea of covering both software projects, like github kinda thing, as well as hardware and other such related things
fuzzyhorns joined the channel
KevinMarks, Garbee and KevinMarks_ joined the channel
KevinMarks, KevinMarks_ and KevinMarks__ joined the channel