#tantekalso, KevinMarks, there is nothing ambigous about it, you explicitly listed rel-alternate in the proposal for rel-urls, therefore it got included. I understand now that is not exactly as you intended, with the additional impact on "rels" etc. - but that was not what you wrote down. hence the need to write these things down.
#KevinMarksit is clearly ambiguous as you and I interpreted it differently
#tantekI'm not sure what's ambiguous about the explicit inclusion of alternate
#tantekI agree that's apparently not what you meant
#tantekbtw using alternate as an example helped make the case for rel-urls, FWIW
#KevinMarksthe ambiguity is you omitting it from rels but including in rel-urls
#tantekthere was no change to "rels" specified in your brainstorm
#tantekwhereas alternate was listed as one of the examples to include in rel-urls
#tantekagain, no ambiguity. inconsistency, sure, but neither I nor anyone else noticed it til now
#tantekcool - assuming we get more consensus that just the editor (myself) and an implementer (go ahead and patch mf2py KevinMarks), then I'll add it to the spec
#Loqitantek meant to say: cool - assuming we get more consensus than just the editor (myself) and an implementer (go ahead and patch mf2py KevinMarks), then I'll add it to the spec
#KevinMarksthat is the name of the repository in microformats
#KevinMarksI'm getting whitespace mismatch errors in test_embedded_parsing and test_hoisting_nested_hcard
#kylewmalso I tend to agree with ben_thatmustbeme that submodules are a pain
#KevinMarksis there a better way to depend on the other repository?
#KevinMarksbeing able to do "git submodule update --remote; nosetests" is handy
#kylewmsomething feels slightly off i guess... should the version of the test suite be dependent on the version of mf2py, or vice versa
#kylewmprobably it should... at least on a macro level.
#kylewmbut like if the tests have something slightly wrong in them, and it gets fixed, it's a pain to have to make a new commit to mf2py to update the submodule
#kylewmstrawman alternative: have the test harness download the test files before running them
#ben_thatmustbemere submodules, the biggest problem is how other people mismanage them
#KevinMarksI'm avoiding thta by not editing the submodule
#ben_thatmustbemethat is one option, haha, but then if you want to update submodules its annoying. 'git submodule udpate --init --recursive' only does a checkout to whatever version of the submodule it was committed with. to pull all the latest libs is a bit annoying
#ben_thatmustbemeworse, i have had people commit and push the submodule ONLY not realizing they had changed directory to inside the submodule
#tantek!tell kylewm re: "if two rels point to the same URL with different properties" - it's a bit odd, but the union of the rels is what applies so it's ok to do so. as far as which text label or type applies, we could pick either one.
pfefferle, TallTed, fuzzyhor_, glennjones, KevinMarks_, eschnou and kez_ joined the channel
#glennjones!tell tantek, KevinMarks is the “text” property of rel-urls a string or a array of string like the other properties? I think it should be an array for consistance
tantek, glennjones, gRegorLove, eschnou, andicascadesf and KevinMarks joined the channel
#KevinMarkshm, what chars are not valid in JSON keys?
#LoqiKevinMarks: glennjones left you a message 3 hours, 12 minutes ago: is the “text” property of rel-urls a string or a array of string like the other properties? I think it should be an array for consistance
tantek joined the channel
#KevinMarks!tell glennjones, tantek said text was OK as a single string, but kyle's issue of pointing to the same URL twice may suggest we need an array. Are there in the wild exampels fo linking to the same URL wiht multiple types? I think that is contrived, but linking to the same URL with multiple texts is quite plausible
#tantekKevinMarks: until we see real world examples and use-cases for that, I'd rather treat it either as first wins or last wins
#Loqitantek: glennjones left you a message 3 hours, 14 minutes ago: is the “text” property of rel-urls a string or a array of string like the other properties? I think it should be an array for consistance
#Loqitantek: KevinMarks left you a message 42 seconds ago: said text was OK as a single string, but kyle's issue of pointing to the same URL twice may suggest we need an array. Are there in the wild exampels fo linking to the same URL wiht multiple types? I think that is contrived, but linking to the same URL with multiple texts is quite plausible
#tanteksimpler for parsers and code that uses results of a parse
#tantekI disagree with array for these because there's no use-case for it, and multiple values there would likely indicate an authoring error instead
#KevinMarkso_O "Schema.org is currently the best way to implement microformats."
#tantekKevinMarks: come now, that kind of SEO nonsense is not even worth eye-raising for, it's no surprise that the SEO hamsterwheel churns out such things.
#tanteksince multiple <link href="url" rel="something"> on the same URL, mean *union* of the somethings
#tantekand from the perspective of consuming code, that makes it simpler
#tantekrather than having to worry that that same URL might be elsewhere in rels
#tantekalso, since URLs are the keys in rel-urls, they have to be unique within rel-urls
#tantekthus the parser already has to do a union of the rels on multiple links to the same href
#tantekand yes at that point, if the multiple links href="sameurl" have any overlap in rel values, then those rel values get collapsed as well, since they're just a set