#aaronpkthe other reason for alwaysh having urls be {url:...} is that it lets you optionally attach meta data that describes the url, since URLs are always referring to some other things
#aaronpkmost common of course is the mf2 vocab of the contents of the URL, like name, content, etc
#aaronpkbut it also allows for things like mime type of images
#kevinmarksso is this a way of getting the rel-urls info back in?
#ben_thatmustbemeaaronpk: from what i can tell the ur: thing isn't needed for things like syndication.
#Loqi[@jamesthomson] Well, cheers Google for completely wrong star ratings on my apps…
#kylewmkevinmarks: I tend to think the rels/rel-urls would be better served by a separate parser. I never want to run the whole mf2 parser just to get like the webmention endpoint
#aaronpkgood point, i usually don't use both kinds of values at the same time
fuzzyhorns joined the channel
#kevinmarkshistorically we have had more interaction between rels and formats
#kevinmarksbut the 'rels apply to the whole document' view undermined that