2018-01-23 UTC
tantek, camb, [kevinmarks], [xavierroy], chrisaldrich, [chrisaldrich], sebsel, nitot, jjuran, [miklb], globbot, adactio, [tantek], 7IZAAPPBD, KartikPrabhu, [pfefferle], [colinwalker], TallTed, gRegorLove and [keithjgrant] joined the channel
# 18:15 aaronpk looks like it's finding the text inside the <style> tag
# 18:16 aaronpk style and script are supposed to be explicitly dropped for p- properties
# 18:16 Loqi [Tantek Çelik] microformats2 parsing specification
# 18:17 KartikPrabhu aaronpk: maybe the python HTML parser gives the textContent as that style thing?
# 18:17 aaronpk I assume style tags should not be considered text content?
# 18:18 KartikPrabhu I would think so, but mf2py leaves that to the HTML parser being used
# 18:19 aaronpk it would apply just as well to style tags in html content
# 18:19 aaronpk <div class="e-content"><style>body{background:red}
</style>my awesome website</div> for example
# 18:20 KartikPrabhu right. and stuff like that might become more common with Web Components and stuff
# 18:21 aaronpk I know tantek has done some per-post styles, not sure if his style tags are in the e-content or not
# 18:21 KartikPrabhu for mf2py this might also depend on whether the lxml or html5lib parser is being used
# 18:24 aaronpk that's *supposed* to have the <style> in the content, unescaped! lol
# 19:14 Loqi [gRegorLove] Proposed updates, which I believe are in line with the resolution:
**parsing a p- property**
No content change, just splitting out whitespace trimming into a separate bullet point:
Original:
> * else return the textContent of the element afte...
# 19:16 gRegorLove +1s or objections welcome on that^ tantek, aaronpk, [kevinmarks], anybody else
# 19:17 Loqi [Zegnat] #17 Define removal of SCRIPT and STYLE elements everywhere textContent is requested.
# 19:17 tantek gRegorLove: is this an edit based on a resolved issue? like I just forgot to edit one place/aspect?
# 19:18 gRegorLove Yes, resolved issue and I think we missed editing some areas.
# 19:18 gRegorLove Linked to the original resolution on gh along with the wiki revision when we updated the spec page.
# 19:18 tantek we specifically must not remove the tags from e-* HTML parsed version
# 19:21 tantek Thanks for your thoroughness gRegorLove - go for it
# 19:21 tantek and note that it's applying the resolution to the older issue to a few spots we missed.
# 19:22 tantek when previously applying edits for that issue
[miklb] joined the channel
# 19:40 gRegorLove Done. Added the wiki revision link to github. #17 can be closed now.
# 19:45 Loqi gregorlove has 18 karma in this channel (212 overall)
KartikPrabhu, [kevinmarks], tantek and [eddie] joined the channel