2018-03-08 UTC
KartikPrabhu, tantek, ben_thatmustbeme, [tantek], nitot, barpthewire and gRegorLove_ joined the channel
# 09:03 Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
# 09:03 Loqi [gRegorLove] #144 Fix recursive parsing
adactio joined the channel
[tantek] joined the channel
# 14:34 aaronpk is testing out the new php-mf2 as an alpha release on his fork
# 14:35 aaronpk we might have to release this as a 1.0 since there is a backwards incompatible change in it!
# 14:51 aaronpk "MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards-compatible manner, and"
# 14:52 [tantek] For a 1.0 perhaps we should get all the open issues resolved for the mf2 spec
# 14:52 [tantek] Perhaps I’m mistaken then and phpmf2 hasn’t been using semver
# 14:52 [tantek] Because there’s definitely been more than two backwards incompatible changes
# 14:54 Loqi [indieweb] php-mf2: php-mf2 is a pure, generic microformats-2 parser for PHP. It makes HTML as easy to consume as JSON.
# 14:55 aaronpk ah from https://semver.org/ "Major version zero (0.y.z) is for initial development. Anything may change at any time. The public API should not be considered stable."
# 15:13 Loqi [indieweb] php-mf2: php-mf2 is a pure, generic microformats-2 parser for PHP. It makes HTML as easy to consume as JSON.
# 15:16 aaronpk well this was unexpected. apparently GWG was taking advantage of implied u-url parsing, so now the posts are showing up without a permalink
# 15:17 Loqi [tantek] #6 reduce instances when p-name is implied
# 15:19 [tantek] There was a separate issue about any other u-* property preventing implied u-url but AFAIK that was fixing bugs
# 15:19 [tantek] Eg so if you had a minimal u-like-of, it wouldn’t imply that same url as the u-url of the post
# 15:25 aaronpk GWG has rel=bookmark on each permalink of the posts on his home page, and previously the php parser was using the backcompat rules to pull that href into the url property
[chrisaldrich], chrisaldrich, [pfefferle], tantek and [miklb] joined the channel
# 16:34 gRegorLove I thought the 2nd digit incremented on breaking changes, so I thought this would be 0.4.0 for php-mf2
# 16:34 aaronpk nope second digit is "MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards-compatible manner"
# 16:35 aaronpk but this will still be 0.4.0 since breaking changes are allowed in 0.*
# 16:35 gRegorLove Scared me for a moment with rel=bookmark that I'd messed something else up :)
# 16:36 aaronpk i'm running this on my reader now so i'll let it collect posts for a day and see how it goes
[cleverdevil], KartikPrabhu and [tantek] joined the channel
# 17:01 [tantek] Should we add to the warning at the top about being banned if you add new examples without reading?
[chrisaldrich], [miklb], [asuh], chrisaldrich, KartikPrabhu, [pfefferle], [kevinmarks], [eddie], [tantek], [manton] and JohnBeales joined the channel