uf-wiki-visitorand ok is h-listing being used by any search engines for indexing?
[jgmac1106], [wiobyrne], [pfefferle], [snarfed], [xavierroy], webchat21, [cjwillcock], webchat96, tantek, gRegorLove, webchat57, KartikPrabhu and chrisaldrich joined the channel; webchat96 left the channel
tantekgRegorLove: that's definitely one of the things in http://microformats.org/wiki/admin-to-do#ongoing, and you've clearly helped out with microformats quite a bit in the channel and github, so yes I'd like to get your help. let me propose it to the other admins (Phae et al) and see what they say
tantekgRegorLove: in the mean time, is there anything else on microformats.org/wiki/admin-to-do that you think you could help with that doesn't require privileged server access per se?
tantekaaronpk, is the IndieAuth for MediaWiki plugin something we could try installing on microformats.org? do you know what minimum version of MediaWiki it depends on?
tantekgRegorLove: in general http://microformats.org/wiki/admin-to-do could use some triage if you have ideas on what is the most important if you want to help start a prioritized list at the top
aaronpkThe good thing is it has almost no code now so it’ll be easy to keep up t date with media wiki changes, the bad thing is it requires running a go app on the server too
aaronpkthey completely changed the way the auth system in media wiki worked between that MW version and current, and i did not want to dig into the details to make it work.
@e_c3mEst ce que quelqu'un sait comment avoir sa box de recherche (moteur de recherche interne) présent dans les SERP au niveau des sitelinks ? Est ce les microformats ? merci pour votre aide :) (twitter.com/_/status/1005193102104113155)
@PressMyWebEst ce que quelqu'un sait comment avoir sa box de recherche (moteur de recherche interne) présent dans les SERP au niveau des sitelinks ? Est ce les microformats ? merci pour votre aide :) (twitter.com/_/status/1005193116566147074)
KartikPrabhu, nitot and tantek_ joined the channel
[cjwillcock]is there any activity around extending the HTML spec to include a _meta_ global attribute for elements? Anything similar (or previously shot down)? My specific use case: for the exclusive purpose of including machine-readable data. Contrast this with the current _class_ global attribute, which may or may not have machine-readable data there.
[cjwillcock]from the spec: "For generic extensions that are to be used by multiple independent tools, _either this specification should be extended to provide the feature explicitly_ ..."
[cjwillcock]Not taking that bait! 🙂 I am not in the situation that I believe something is wrong with how class is defined, nor used nor with microformats(2). Rather, I am encouraged that there is an opportunity to separate concerns by removing those tokens which the UA should ignore from class; from being processed by run-time facilities (css stuff, javascript stuff) such as a document.getElementsByClassName(), and similar.