#microformats 2018-07-02
2018-07-02 UTC
KartikPrabhu, GWG-, [snarfed], barpthewire, [dougbeal], adactio, [jgmac1106], [jemostrom], [manton], [eddie], [wiobyrne] and gidzit joined the channel
#
aaronpk forgot that the ruby parser didn't get updated for the new implied p-name rules yet! https://github.com/indieweb/microformats-ruby/issues/86
[jeffperry], [cleverdevil] and [cjwillcock] joined the channel
#
[cjwillcock] microformats.org seems to be down. https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/microformats.org
#
[cjwillcock] it came back, just like that - thanks for checking
#
[cjwillcock] seems to be some thrashing going on - microformats.org is down again now
[kim_landwehr], [kevinmarks], [manton], jackjamieson and [jgarber] joined the channel
#
[jgarber] aaronpk: Is there a public test suite (similar to https://webmention.rocks) for Microformats?
#
[jgarber] I 100% wanna make this better: https://codeclimate.com/github/indieweb/microformats-ruby 😄
#
ben_thatmustbeme i'm around, just super busy
#
ben_thatmustbeme [jgarber]: if you want to work from my code-cleanup branch, I started adding a bunch more tests / coverage
#
ben_thatmustbeme but i know the hold-up was the ruby version thing
#
ben_thatmustbeme i'm fine moving 2.4 as a requirement
#
ben_thatmustbeme i don't really see a good reason for it though unless we are actually using something that requires it
#
ben_thatmustbeme otherwise you are just needlessly breaking support for legacy code
#
ben_thatmustbeme [jgarber]: invite sent
[kim_landwehr] joined the channel
[eddie] joined the channel
#
ben_thatmustbeme yes
#
ben_thatmustbeme i believe you need to go there
[cleverdevil] joined the channel
#
ben_thatmustbeme its not actually showing it as an invite, more like you are just added actually
#
[jgarber] https://github.com/indieweb/microformats-ruby/settings/collaboration would show collaborator permissions.
#
ben_thatmustbeme i think you already had it anyway from being in the indieweb group
#
ben_thatmustbeme org that is
#
ben_thatmustbeme what would you need admin for exactly?
#
ben_thatmustbeme i'd rather just leave it for now
#
ben_thatmustbeme also, by the way, the code smell score, is mostly based on the fact that functions are large, which actually was intentional to make them match the parsing spec as I remember
#
ben_thatmustbeme i need to look at all that code again, I would hold off on a new version release if we want to look at a full refactor like that
#
ben_thatmustbeme also, updated the code-coverage branch just now to 2.4.4
#
ben_thatmustbeme i tried playing with #83 the other week and if I try to force it to work as the test suggests it should, it breaks a lot of other tests
#
ben_thatmustbeme so not entirely sure where to go on it
#
ben_thatmustbeme as for #86, i need to review the spec changes
#
@dwhly ↩️ Or, you could just use the std client, and pull from the API in order to post the microformats. (twitter.com/_/status/1013853850095120384)
[Vanessa] joined the channel
#
ben_thatmustbeme sure
#
ben_thatmustbeme #78 can be resolved as well
#
ben_thatmustbeme i think we said the licensing was fine, just go ahead with it
[dougbeal], KartikPrabhu, tantek__, [manton] and [cleverdevil] joined the channel
