2018-07-02 UTC
KartikPrabhu, GWG-, [snarfed], barpthewire, [dougbeal], adactio, [jgmac1106], [jemostrom], [manton], [eddie], [wiobyrne] and gidzit joined the channel
# 14:23 Loqi [aaronpk] #86 Updates for new implied p-name rules
[jeffperry], [cleverdevil] and [cjwillcock] joined the channel
# 15:51 [cjwillcock] it came back, just like that - thanks for checking
# 15:52 [cjwillcock] seems to be some thrashing going on - microformats.org is down again now
[kim_landwehr], [kevinmarks], [manton], jackjamieson and [jgarber] joined the channel
# 17:14 [jgarber] aaronpk: Semi-related, but I’ve been doing similar cleanup on the microformats Ruby gem with the goal of making it easier to work on.
# 17:15 [jgarber] I’m not sure who’s got admin rights to the repo, though, so progress has been slow.
# 17:18 aaronpk kinda, there's a github repo with a bunch of test cases
# 17:18 Loqi [microformats] tests: Microformats test suite
# 17:19 aaronpk most of the simple ones are right tho, it's still a good start
# 17:20 [jgarber] I may be able to devote some time to cleanup on that gem this week that should help with future improvements.
# 17:25 [jgarber] I’ll see where I left off. Not sure how active [ben_thatmustbeme] and [shaners] are on that repo, though.
# 17:45 ben_thatmustbeme [jgarber]: if you want to work from my code-cleanup branch, I started adding a bunch more tests / coverage
# 17:46 ben_thatmustbeme i don't really see a good reason for it though unless we are actually using something that requires it
# 17:59 aaronpk okay, rebooting the server is no longer actually fixing the problem
# 18:00 aaronpk adminhelp: does anyone know the current root password on the server so I can go in and actually look at what's going on? If not, I am happy to reset it.
# 18:02 [jgarber] [ben_thatmustbeme] Agreed. I’ve come around on that one. Authoring in 2.4.x (2.4.4 being the most current) and running Travis, etc. against 2.4.x, 2.5.x seems like the wiser approach.
# 18:03 [jgarber] [ben_thatmustbeme] Would you be hip to add me as an admin on the indieweb/microformats-ruby repo?
[kim_landwehr] joined the channel
[eddie] joined the channel
# 18:19 [jgarber] [ben_thatmustbeme] Did you invite `jgarber623` (my GitHub username) ?
# 18:21 [jgarber] Hrm, that redirects me back to the main page of the repo.
[cleverdevil] joined the channel
# 18:23 [jgarber] Ah, right. Okay. So I may have Read or Write permissions. I forget which is the default.
# 18:25 [jgarber] Only useful bit would be adding/modifying/removing integrations (e.g. Travis, CodeClimate, etc.)
# 18:25 [jgarber] But that’s not 100% necessary if you’d rather leave me as a “Write”
# 18:27 ben_thatmustbeme also, by the way, the code smell score, is mostly based on the fact that functions are large, which actually was intentional to make them match the parsing spec as I remember
# 18:28 ben_thatmustbeme i need to look at all that code again, I would hold off on a new version release if we want to look at a full refactor like that
# 18:31 ben_thatmustbeme i tried playing with #83 the other week and if I try to force it to work as the test suggests it should, it breaks a lot of other tests
# 18:34 [jgarber] I’d be very much in favor of putting together a `microformats.rocks` test suite like we have with Micropub and Webmention (and a few other things, if memory serves…)
# 18:46 [jgarber] [ben_thatmustbeme] With the Ruby version changes, we’re introducing a breaking change which means the next version of the gem would be 5.0.0.
# 18:46 [jgarber] Should we create a milestone for 5.0.0 and add issues to the milestone?
[Vanessa] joined the channel
# 18:52 [jgarber] Oh, goodness. Forgot about that. What’d we decide? I’m inclined to ditch the logo and references to it in the `README.md`.
[dougbeal], KartikPrabhu, tantek__, [manton] and [cleverdevil] joined the channel