#microformats 2019-01-01
2019-01-01 UTC
[kevinmarks] and [tantek] joined the channel
[tantek] joined the channel
# edited /microformats2-parsing () "(-1001) incorporate proposal for issue 2, edits reviewed, test case provided in issue https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/2#issuecomment-450669274" ( view diff)
# #microformats2 parsing spec updated: http://microformats.org/wiki/index.php?title=microformats2-parsing&diff=66969&oldid=66967
* always parse alt with img src for accessibility info by default https://github.com/microformats/microformats2-parsing/issues/2
Implemented in current version of:
* mf2py - behind flag, in use by http://Brid.gy
This is a ...
http://tantek.com/t4yG5 ( twitter.com/_/status/1079984280539942914)
[nick] joined the channel
gRegorLove, barpthewire, metbril and sebsel joined the channel
# Why did I stop contributing to Microformats? Microformats 2 which seems to have just appeared without much consensus a few years ago, is total nonsense... We agreed years back when we tried to map DC terms that "stick" separators "-" were pointless yet they were adopted for MF2 ( twitter.com/_/status/1080068413626699776)
# ↩️ Can you document that agreement? I have no recollection of it, and what we do have about DC says the opposite: http://microformats.org/wiki/vote-links-faq - namespaces were the pointless part. Microformats-2 has extensive consensus and interoperating implementations and we'd love to add yours ( twitter.com/_/status/1080071060664565760)
[kevinmarks] joined the channel
# The latest Aimarren aldizkaria! https://paper.li/AimarSaldias/1328614319?edition_id=cdd469d0-0dc1-11e9-9722-0cc47a0d164b Thanks to @teketen #microformats2 ( twitter.com/_/status/1080080220395397122)
# ↩️ Hello Kevin, nice to speak to you again, long time, the discussion was on uf-new, I will dig it for you. Yes namespaces are pointless in microformats, which also makes me wonder why they were implemented, call it what you like "uf" is a namespace, the stick is just a separator. ( twitter.com/_/status/1080081676909326336)
# ↩️ The mf2 prefixes aren't namespaces, they're parsing directives - they tell you where to look for the property, rather than each implementation having to update a hard-coded list. This gives greater flexibility in defining new microformats or adding properties to existing ones ( twitter.com/_/status/1080082328830070784)
metbril joined the channel
# ↩️ Yes you could also call them scoping mechanisms, there are "h-", "p-", "u-", "dt-" and "e-" prefixes, the fact that they have "special meaning" in microformats, it's a mechanism that binds arbitrary strings to a definition (an object), a namespace. ( twitter.com/_/status/1080101863775784960)
metbril joined the channel
# ↩️ @WebOrganics we could move over to https://chat.indieweb.org/microformats/ - it has most of the twitter thread already ( twitter.com/_/status/1080118741692805121)
[tantek] and [kevinmarks] joined the channel; metbril left the channel
weborganics joined the channel
# ↩️ Yep, seen it, won't be discussing there. I hoped for a long time that microformats would change their ways revert back to the simplest solution, but nearly 10 years later an microformats are broken because of it. Will just keep on with uf1, and hope one day people will see sense. ( twitter.com/_/status/1080147796660027392)
rodolfojcj and [sebsel] joined the channel
sebsel joined the channel
[schmarty] joined the channel
[kevinmarks], [Khurt], [davidmead], [chrisaldrich], [tantek], [benatwork], psaa and maxandersen1 joined the channel