2020-04-27 UTC
[prtksxna], gRegorLove_ and [LewisCowles] joined the channel
# 07:10 Zegnat Hmm, not sure I would make me having read a book a (by necessity backdated?) event
[mapkyca], mauz555, jeremycherfas_ and [KevinMarks] joined the channel
Philippe, jamietanna and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
# 10:18 [jgmac1106] seems to be what most people do, though the debate of my read posts as an h-review or a an h-entry with an h-reviews as nested is interesting. Give me the option to rate the book or not
# 10:18 [jgmac1106] I am not wrapping any author's in an h-card given there is really nobdy doing aanything with the read posts anyways, but may start
[prtksxna], [grantcodes], [tw2113], [chrisaldrich], [LewisCowles], KartikPrabhu, dougbeal|mb1, [mapkyca], [benatwork], indy_, Sajesajama__, vesper11, omz13, globbot, joshghent, cjw6k, [snarfed], ChanServ, [KevinMarks], [Aaron_Klemm] and [jansauer] joined the channel
# 17:44 [jansauer] and now i feel like i can’t see the wood for the trees.
# 17:44 [jansauer] Does anyone know what part i’m missing?
# 17:46 sknebel nice to see we haven't entirely lost you, even though your PR rotted longer than planned (sorry...)
# 17:46 sknebel If I understand correctly, what you are looking for is here: microformats.org/wiki/microformats2-parsing#parsing_an_e-_property
[jeremycherfas] joined the channel
# 17:52 sknebel [jansauer]: no, I think you aren't missing anything actually, and this isn't defined that way
# 17:53 [jansauer] Yes I almost forgot that project but after geting a mail that my mr was merged .. 😅
# 17:53 sknebel (and existing parsers appear to disagree in how to do it ...)
# 17:53 sknebel lets see if Zegnat or someone else will point out in a bit what I missed :D
# 17:55 [jansauer] it totally makes sense for the usability of microformats. But i wanted to check the spec before implementing it
# 17:55 sknebel so the php parser appears to do it, the python one does not
# 17:56 sknebel and I agree the spec does not require it for the "html" value
# 18:01 Loqi [willnorris] #38 resolve relative URLs in e-* html
# 18:06 willnorris yeah... looks like that issue stalled out. I did end up changing the Go library to resolve relative URLs, fwiw
# 18:12 [jansauer] Think i will to the same; Having working urls when embading the html in a new site makes it so much usefuller.
# 18:13 [jansauer] And i definitely will have a look at your implementation in order to see what attributes i forgot
# 18:23 sknebel seems clear consensus that the parsers want to do that, just dropped it
# 18:23 Loqi [jansauer] has 4 karma over the last year
# 18:32 Zegnat [jansauer]: hiya long time no talk! (Missing all the usual Germany events :( ) If you take any action with that, please do comment on that parsing issue. Might be just the push needed to get it to land in the spec
# 19:27 sknebel actually, Zegnat had a long list of all the properties that contain urls somewhere
# 19:28 Zegnat Actually linked from my proposed text, because I wanted to be clear what links would need to be resolved by parsers
# 19:29 sknebel [jansauer]: ^^^ there is a list of attributes in the issue
[cleverdevil], [snarfed], [chrisaldrich], gRegorLove and mauz555 joined the channel