#[tantek]to emphasize, GWG, I would like to see h-event and h-feed advance as well. my question to you is, besides the frustration that "someone else hasn't done the work", have you looked into what is needed to advance them, and if so, where did you personally get stuck?
#[tantek](genuine question, I'm trying to debug the process of broader participation in advancing specs, and you're my test case 🙂 )
#[tantek]we need to solve that more than any one spec, because we're all volunteer-time-limited
#GWGI think if the process had some concrete examples, it would feel less daunting to people to chip in
#tantekedited /irc (-148) "dedup some, drop some older non-current links" (view diff)
#tantekedited /h-event (-35) "editorial: fragments for status and participate, dedup IRC line" (view diff)
#tantekedited /h-entry (+49) "editorial: fragments for status and participate, dedup IRC line, note explicitly in participate that change control can be used to advance the spec (already implied from Status section)" (view diff)
#[tantek]GWG, re: "I have no idea where to start", not even the spec URL? 😉
#GWGDoesn't tell me how to accomplish the goal of moving out of draft
#[tantek]GWG, right, closest is https://microformats.org/wiki/h-event#participate and that only tells you how to file issue and participate. Looks like I never updated h-event to use the change control because we have an explicit issue open on that!
#GWG[tantek]: Would you be able to comment on the last remark in that issue you referenced?
#[tantek]GWG, indeed that issue is clearly where we got stuck!
#[tantek]GWG, I remember reading your comment before and thinking it sounded reasonable — if we thought the change control process was/is working for h-entry
#[tantek]so that begs that question, do you think the change control process is working for h-entry? or are things similarly or differently "stuck" there?
#[tantek]in other words, before generalizing a process like that, we should make sure it is working well in the specific current instance(s)!
rockorager joined the channel
#GWG[tantek]: The idea of it is...the practice, not so much
#[tantek]GWG, so really we should push through figuring out h-entry issues, and noting where the process is ambiguous or otherwise unclear, before generalizing it to h-event
[chrisaldrich] joined the channel
#GWGThen maybe I will sit down and reread it and take notes
ur5us_ joined the channel
#[tantek]GWG, maybe pick the h-entry issue most important to you, and we can start analyzing what might be blocking it from a process perspective
#GWG[tantek]: Can we successfully execute outside of real time?
#[tantek]GWG, I think there are aspects that a bit of async exploration may help to unstick
#[tantek]if so, there's a good chance we can clear away at least some things so that the time we do spend in "real time" is much more effectively spent