#tantekedited /h-card (-5) "editorial: fragments for status and participate, dedup IRC line" (view diff)
#@ochtendgrijs↩️ Ondertussen draait Apache op Drupal. Mogelijk probeer ik nog om op basis van de homepage m’n eigen RSS te genereren. Dat zou makkelijker zijn als er voor microformats was gekozen. (twitter.com/_/status/1407234126072225792)
hendursaga and [KevinMarks] joined the channel
#[KevinMarks]Nothing stands out from this year, though that's true in a broader sense too. The idea of adding CI tests to check that your microformats still work may be worth emphasising
barnaby, [jgmac1106] and rockorager joined the channel
#barnabyI assume there was discussion about it at some point, and a reason not to migrate. possibly due to wanting to support existing accounts, and mediawiki not supporting multiple authentication options? but I don’t know exactly
#rockoragerWorking through the authorship-spec and the representative-h-card algorithm...I noticed that at no point does the authorship spec say to use a top-level h-card from the page in question
#rockoragerSo on example.org/page, if there is a top-level h-card but no other reference to an author, you wouldn't *technically* define that top level as the author
#rockoragerWhich I guess makes sense for sites with many authors, the top level would be the org's h-card and not the author's. But presumably they'd have an authorship reference *somewhere* else
#rockoragerAnyways, it seemed like as a last ditch effort...after checking h-entry.author, h-feed.author, rel=author, then a top-level h-card on that page could be used
#rockorager(This may be more an indieweb vs microformats discussion, apologies if it's the wrong place for it)
barnaby joined the channel
#barnabyrockorager: “7.4 if the h-entry's page has 1+ h-card with url == author-page URL, use first such h-card, exit.” is close but still relies on there being an explicit author URL somewhere
#barnabyIIRC my mf-cleaner getAuthor function uses the first h-card which shares a domain with the post URL as fallback if it can’t find anything else
#barnabyand yes, this would probably be more of an #indieweb-dev discussion, as authorship is defined on the indieweb wiki
hendursaga, [schmarty] and [tantek] joined the channel
#[tantek]I omitted a “plain” top level h-card like that because we found too many false positives at the time (top level h-cards that did NOT represent the author
#[tantek]It is better to have no author info, than mistaken author info
#[tantek]Maybe that’s worth capturing in the design methodology of authorship and/or representative h-card.
[Ana_Rodrigues] and [tw2113_Slack_] joined the channel
#barnabyah, sorry. timezone name in Continent/City form then?
#GWGbarnaby: Probably, the question is more what I posted in #indieweb
#GWGIn the dt-published markup, I'll always have the offset, so this is purely visual
[snarfed] joined the channel
#barnabyGWG: makes sense, I thought you were asking how to show the timezone you can usually be found in, on your profile
kevinf, [fluffy], [schmarty], justBull, rockorager, barnaby and [tantek] joined the channel
#[tantek]reserved as in don't propose a random made-up p-tz property
#barnabyso it just means “don’t propose this”? even when it gives an example of how it could be marked up?
#[tantek]it's going to be a hard one to "get right", as the way timezones work in vcard/ical is very weird, and timezones as a whole are an iffy thing to denote (quite the disconnect between complexity, automated processing ability, actually representing what a user would want to show/display or already does on their homepage, and actually representing something useful to parse and do something with)
#[tantek]the example should probably be stricken if there is one
#barnabyI’m wondering if there’s a better term to use than “reserved”
#barnabyor at least if we can add some clearer explanation of their status
#barnabywaltersedited /h-card (+729) "/* Reserved properties */ removed example, clarified status of reserved properties" (view diff)
#barnaby^^^ [tantek] if you have similar comments about why the other reserved properties have that status, feel free to add or let me know here. I have my suspicions about why they weren’t used, but wasn’t part of the mf1->mf2 migration so don’t want to write something inaccurate
#barnabywaltersedited /h-card (+771) "/* Implementations */ added some of the more notable indieweb software which publishes/consumes h-card" (view diff)
rockorager joined the channel
#barnabyis there a summary of current mf2 pronoun markup anywhere? there are many different proposals, examples and discussions spread across the MF and IW wikis
[snarfed] joined the channel
#ZegnatI am not sure there is a "current mf2 pronoun markup", other than running with any of the many proposals. Does not feel like the community as a whole has landed anywhere yet, last I checked.
#barnabythe current state of pronoun markup proposals, then
rockorager joined the channel
#barnabyseems like at least for publishing, there are enough IRL examples to start comparing usage
#[tantek]Zegnat, looks like /pronouns currently redirects to that section, which has grown large enough that it's likely worth moving to its own page (replacing that redirect with the actual content), leaving perhaps a 2 sentence summary in the brainstorming page
#[tantek]we do also have a separate /gender page which has even more specific pages if you'd like to see a model of how the content could be split up according to microformats process methods
#barnabywhat’s the current thinking on documenting stuff like this on the IW vs MF wiki? it’s really spread around at the moment
#[tantek](I did that a while ago (on the video page) as part of trying to see if the markup used was consistent enough to help advance the u-video property)
#barnabyIW wiki for informal discussion, MF wiki for going through the microformats process?
#[tantek]good q. microformats wiki uses very short example citations, only in list form
#barnabyyeah but then there’s the brainstorming pages on the MF wiki, which have discussion and longer examples
#[tantek]IW wiki provides much more expanded / explanatory examples, often with a subheading/section per example
#[tantek]brainstorming is very different from documenting examples
#[tantek]documenting examples is about citing real world examples, and then extracting / documenting the markup found therein
#[tantek]brainstorming is more aspirational / inventing something, then providing an "example" of what it *could* look like
#sknebelZegnat: I proposed something? was that an attempt to get the language thing in there? (/me has no recollection right now...)
#ZegnatI use u-pronoun, you wrote that you would prefer a textual label + link, so some form of h-*, sknebel
#[tantek]this is why I directed you to the /gender page for a structure to consider copying for /pronouns (top level), /pronouns-examples (documentation of real world publishing of pronouns content), /pronouns-formats (any existing attempts to provide formal structured formats either in plaintext or in markup), and /pronouns-brainstorming
#sknebelZegnat: ah right, not for language, for text + link, gotcha
#barnabywe also mention on the wiki that any proposed h-card properties should also be proposed to vCard, how seriously are we taking that at the moment?
#[tantek]the *-examples documented on the microformats wiki are more often from *anywhere* (not just personal websites), and very often not from folks in the community, more of a "anything on the web" reach
#[tantek]yes the higher level goal there is to not diverge (e.g. have different approaches) from vCard. it's ok if there are vCard properties that we don't make "official" in h-card (because a lot of vCard is aspirational tbh, having participated there), and it's ok if we have h-card additions which aren't in vCard yet
#barnabyokay, I’ll start with the /gender-* pages you suggested and we can worry about vCard later, if at all
#[tantek]when you get to documenting /pronouns-formats, that's *exactly* where you should cite that vCardDAV discussion thread!
#[tantek]yes the individual examples would be in -examples (the key aspect is that they are publishing the *information* about pronouns; the markup is irrelevant to whether they are an example or not)
#[tantek]no the different "approaches" to markup are not -formats, there is no spec! what they could be taken as is *-brainstorming, since they're *experiments* (at best), which is very far from any kind of actual format (though is useful input *for* a format)
#barnabyokay, and -formats is for existing formats with implementations containing pronoun info, and the currently published experimentation is in -brainstorming
#barnabywalterscreated /pronouns-examples (+2450) "Created page with "This page documents specific examples of how pronoun information is currently published on the web, as well as UIs which support pronoun fields. == Sites and Services == Exam..."" (view diff)