gRegor, nixer, jacky, [jeremycherfas] and ur5us joined the channel
#[KevinMarks]Using #1 for numbers is a common Americanism anyway, so it feels natural, but it usually means "first in the list" rather than numerically 1
nixer, jacky, [schmarty] and gRegor joined the channel; petermolnar left the channel
#IWDiscordGateway<capjamesg> Oh I hadn’t considered internationalization [KevinMarks].
#IWDiscordGateway<capjamesg> There needs to be a universal way to submit a response to a poll.
#[tantek]does there? Twitter and IG examples would disagree
#[tantek]neither offer "translations" of poll items AFAIK
#[tantek]or if they do, are fully semi-automatic service-side, with zero work required on behalf of the author
#[tantek](and thus zero publishing markup / complexity)
#IWDiscordGateway<capjamesg> Is a response like #1 easily understood across the world?
therussbain joined the channel
#[tantek]I don't really see use of "#1" in Twitter/IG polls so idk
ur5us joined the channel
#[snarfed]1the UX takeaway from https://indieweb.org/poll#Silo_Examples is that poll respondents don't type text at all, they just tap/click directly on their response, which definitely seems easier and more understandable
#[snarfed]1so capjamesg, straw man design: what if you have a button for each response, and clicking on one asks the user for their web site, IndieAuths, and sends a Micropub request that creates the fully formed post with that button's poll response?
#[snarfed]1you'd still have to figure out the contents of the response post, and how the receiving site interprets it, but the response post contents wouldn't be as much of a UX problem, since it's populated automatically
#[snarfed]1(we'd still want the response post to have good text-first design and be understandable to viewers, but that should be doable)
[tw2113_Slack_] joined the channel
#[tantek]Exactly snarfed. And those different vote buttons could also be done as webactions for replies with prefilled content