#microformats 2022-08-07

2022-08-07 UTC
neceve joined the channel
# 02:51 
[tantek] note that RFC6903 is only INFORMATIONAL and quite out of date since 2013 with no updates
# 02:52 
[tantek] it's fine for an example of prior work, but not a standard
# 02:52 
GWG [tantek]: Agreed. As said, seems better then just privacy
# 02:53 
[tantek] GWG, indeed, lacking a better name, no need to bikeshed
petermolnar, ^[, IWSlackGateway, neceve and [marksuth] joined the channel
# 11:45 
IWDiscordGateway <capjamesg> [tantek] the privacy-policy attribute is in the IANA register though?
gRegorLove_ joined the channel
# 12:40 
@kevinmarks Down to Earth (@ Greenside Infirmary Street in Edinburgh w/ @andrewjohnmarks @microformats) https://www.swarmapp.com/c/8cIrT40Fnq5 (twitter.com/_/status/1556257765932339200)
gRegorLove__ and [schmarty] joined the channel
# 16:50 
@kevinmarks Unfortunate (@ The Udderbelly w/ @andrewjohnmarks @microformats) https://www.swarmapp.com/c/jVuFQYLQzHV (twitter.com/_/status/1556321482275713024)
[Jamie_Tanna] and [snarfed] joined the channel
# 23:52 
omz13 [tantek] I wouldn't dismiss an RFC just because its informational, and besides which: https://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml