#[snarfed]^ thought a bit more about this u-featured proposal. I like it, but I'm wondering how we distinguish featured links from featured photos in parsed mf2. would we maybe first remove any links in u-featured that are also in u-photo?
[tantek] joined the channel
#[tantek]They have different consuming use cases so it's not clear you have to do any removing in general
#[tantek]One is for showing an image as part of the link preview of that thing, the other is for appending and embedded link preview of one of the links inside
#[tantek]In each consuming use case the consuming code can be picky about what kind of u-featured resource it's looking for
#[snarfed]right, I'm asking _how_ consuming code should be picky, since u-featured on both <a> and <img> end up as flat string URLs in the featured property
#[tantek]maybe. more and more (not that you can depend on this), images have alt text in their structure
#[snarfed]sure, nice occasional heuristic, but not really more
#[tantek]and yeah, doing it by suffix is fine for auto-embedding/linking but perhaps not for this?
#[snarfed]🤷 also only heuristic, but probably at least a more dependable one
#[snarfed]I wonder how often people put both u-photo and u-featured on featured images, vs just u-featured
#[tantek]let's take that to #indieweb-dev because I think that's a use-case discussion
eitilt, Mandaris, gRegor, [Joe_Crawford], [KevinMarks], jacky, [Jo], [Al_Abut] and [aciccarello] joined the channel