#microformats 2024-10-20

2024-10-20 UTC
#
[tantek] these are good observations trwnh. I believe the usage of h-cite in the wild has broadened beyond the tight specifics in the site so the spec should be updated to reflect reality.
#
[tantek] where do you see the "on-site" vs. "off-site" wording? link? (wherever it is, we should adjust it to be more like what you suggest, the thing itself (object) vs a reference to the thing (link)
#
[tantek] )
aagaming joined the channel
#
trwnh for "off-site" wording, this was on indiewebify.me/validate-h-entry when trying to validate an h-entry that uses a "simple" .u-in-reply-to on an <a href> referring to a resource on the same site
#
[tantek] odd. can you send me the specific URL? I tried one myself and didn't get that
#
trwnh https://indiewebify.me/validate-h-entry/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftrwnh.com%2Ftheorycrafting%2Fquote-proofs%2F i was wrong, it was not a "simple" .u-in-reply-to, it was an old template that used .u-in-reply-to.h-entry (instead of .u-in-reply-to.h-cite as is more idiomatic)
#
trwnh i'll refrain from pushing updates to my WIP live site for a bit so that you have a chance to see the same thing i saw
#
[tantek] thanks. looking for it now
#
[tantek] found it in the source
#
[tantek] feel free to update!
gRegorLove_, gRegorLove__, barnaby and sebbu joined the channel
#
gRegor Yeah, a lot of the language on indiewebify.me is older at this point. I think that part of the validator should offer it as a suggestion, that you *could* add .h-cite to the .u-in-reply-to, especially if you also add more to the reply context. But .u-in-reply-to alone on a URL is minimum viable and not a problem.
#
[tantek] agreed
#
gRegor This is more indieweb-dev or -meta, but I'm going to make a concerted effort to make some more progress on indiewebify.me and at least get it on a github fork if others want to contribute
#
gRegor Maybe my indieweb new year goal
#
[mattl] it's PHP?
#
gRegor This issue: https://github.com/indieweb/indiewebify-me/issues/82
#
Loqi [preview] [gRegorLove] #82 Migrate to Slim4 framework
#
gRegor Yeah, PHP
#
[mattl] Nice, I'd be up for helping in the new year
#
[Joe_Crawford] *I* actually expressed an intent to contribute to indiewebify-me at SD/2023 and have not acted on that goal.
#
gRegor lol, from a year ago: https://chat.indieweb.org/dev/2023-10-16#t1697491283427200 😭
#
Loqi [preview] [gRegor] I'm hoping to spend more time on https://github.com/indieweb/indiewebify-me/issues/82 soon, maybe done by end of year? I think that will make it easier to expand and improve indiewebify.me tools
#
gRegor Anyway, we can continue talking about that in indieweb-dev
#
[tantek] will do!
#
[tantek] thanks gRegor++
#
Loqi gRegor has 4 karma in this channel over the last year (133 in all channels)
#
aaronpk pretty sure october 2023 was like 1 month ago
#
gRegor 🤔 checks out
#
[tantek] would say something about solar orbital vibes except the position of the sun has changed so much that we're nowhere near (relative in Milky Way galaxy terms, nevermind local cluster or Big Bang center terms) where we physically were last October
#
gRegor Haha
#
gRegor Eternal October
[qubyte] joined the channel