#social 2015-08-06

2015-08-06 UTC
shepazu, jasnell, KevinMarks, jasnell_, jaywink, csarven, bblfish and the_frey joined the channel
#
csarven https://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/44
#
Loqi Scapadis made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-08-11]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85307&oldid=85291
the_frey_, jasnell and the_frey joined the channel
#
ben_thatmustbeme csarven: see my note on that issue, the resolution you reference was objected to by jasnell who was not in the meeting. discussion continued for several weeks after that
#
csarven ben_thatmustbeme Thanks for the note. While the discussions and (ongoing?) work is good for documentation, it still doesn't address the core issues which I've highlighted. End result appears to remain all the same.
#
ben_thatmustbeme yes ongoing, as2 is still a work in progress
#
ben_thatmustbeme rhiaro is also still updating mf2 examples
#
ben_thatmustbeme these arguements were made before, result it the same, it will likely have the same dissent, would prefer to not waste our now even rarer time on an issue we already went through
#
csarven ben_thatmustbeme Looking forward to the results. I'm especially interested in seeing the mf progress on the vocabulary development end as per its own process. if you have URLs to share, that'd be great.
#
ben_thatmustbeme vote won't be on whether to keep mf2 or not. first vote is to open an issue or not
#
csarven The issues are raised for a reason. You should take a note of why they are being raised again and again. ISSUE-44 is raised to cover both the fact that ACTION-26 is incomplete however was marked CLOSED/completed, as well as the confusion and lossiness of the mf examples as per intended AS statements.
#
csarven So, the very first thing you should be doing is OPENing up that ACTION-26 if you are claiming that you are still working on it. ISSUE-44 is still up there as it gives the bigger picture. Let me know if you'd like me to clarify any of the points.
#
ben_thatmustbeme please read the rest of the meeting minutes
#
csarven I have, and as I've already stated in my first response to you on that earlier, ... nothing changed.
#
ben_thatmustbeme continued review of all examples is implicit was part of the work on AS2. it was raised as an issue and action because jasnell was just guessing at mf2 and thus should be removed, the same issue still exists with MD / RDFa https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-06-23-minutes (not sure if that is still the case)
#
ben_thatmustbeme jasnell was content in closing action-26 as it is something you could keep open infinitely
#
ben_thatmustbeme jasnell could correct me on that though, I don't want to speak for him
#
ben_thatmustbeme the "ISSUE" is that microformats do not align with AS2-json-ld, raise that as such, and thats fine. any request to remove MF2 should not be part of and ISSUE as you are claiming a single solution where multiple exist
#
ben_thatmustbeme for example, updating the mf2 examples
#
ben_thatmustbeme or curtailing as2
the_frey, jasnell, bblfish, KevinMarks, jaywink, shepazu, Arnaud1, csarven and tilgovi joined the channel