#social 2015-08-11
2015-08-11 UTC
jasnell, bblfish_ and csarven joined the channel
#
Loqi Abasset made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-08-11]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85328&oldid=85327

the_frey, the_frey_, peacekeeper and jaywink joined the channel
#
Loqi Hhalpin made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-08-11]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85333&oldid=85328

bblfish, pfefferle and jasnell joined the channel
#
Loqi Alehors made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-08-11]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85335&oldid=85333

bblfish, melvster and jasnell_ joined the channel
tantek joined the channel
#
ben_thatmustbeme so its october?

#
ben_thatmustbeme updated

#
ben_thatmustbeme thanks melvster for pointing that out

#
Loqi Benthatmustbeme made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-08-11]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85336&oldid=85335

#
ben_thatmustbeme NEW phone number: +1-617-324-0000 There is a meeting number: 642 112 960 The password is still 'socl' (lowercase, easier for mobile). [WebEx]

KevinMarks, tantek and eprodrom joined the channel
#
eprodrom Hello all
#
ben_thatmustbeme hey

cwebber2 joined the channel
#
ben_thatmustbeme bloop

#
eprodrom I forget the recipe for declaring presence
#
eprodrom +present eprodrom
#
eprodrom Is that it?
#
eprodrom Ah right
#
eprodrom present+ eprodrom
#
eprodrom ah
RRSAgent joined the channel
#
RRSAgent logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/08/11-social-irc

Zakim joined the channel
#
eprodrom present+ aaronpk
#
eprodrom ha ha
#
eprodrom Whoops
#
eprodrom present+ eprodrom
#
ben_thatmustbeme present+ ben_thatmustbeme

#
ben_thatmustbeme present+ sandro

#
ben_thatmustbeme present+ tantek

#
ben_thatmustbeme present+ Arnaud

#
eprodrom I will scribe
#
ben_thatmustbeme I'll scribe

#
eprodrom scribenick eprodrom
#
ben_thatmustbeme smiles

#
eprodrom Arnaud: first, admin part
#
eprodrom Arnaud: any objections to approving the minutes?
#
ben_thatmustbeme i have

#
ben_thatmustbeme +1 to approve

#
eprodrom I opened and read
#
eprodrom +1
#
eprodrom RESOLVED: Approval of Minutes of 28 July 2015
#
eprodrom TOPIC: Next F2F meeting
#
eprodrom Arnaud: sandro has suggested we need to discuss F2F
#
ben_thatmustbeme really wishes he could go :*(

#
eprodrom Arnaud: next F2F is in October in Japan
#
eprodrom Arnaud: it is normal to have events around the world for the W3C
#
eprodrom Arnaud: but it is a significant travel effort
#
eprodrom Arnaud: It is a chicken-and-egg issue
#
eprodrom Arnaud: we're not asking for hard commitments but we're looking for some intentions
#
eprodrom Arnaud: it's better to have ideas of intentions rather than no idea at all
#
eprodrom Arnaud: TPAC requires registration
#
eprodrom Arnaud: so we have to do both (wiki and TPAC registration)
#
KevinMarks present+ kevinmarks

#
eprodrom Arnaud: There is a cost associated with participating at TPAC (~$85/day)
#
eprodrom Arnaud: it includes a big conference experience (food, space, etc.)
#
ben_thatmustbeme $85 is if you get your tickets in before a certain date

#
eprodrom Arnaud: and a good opportunity to cross-pollinate
#
ben_thatmustbeme it costs more if you register too late

#
Loqi Alehors made 2 edits to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85338&oldid=0

#
Loqi Alehors made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-08-11]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85339&oldid=85336

#
Loqi Sandro made 3 edits to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85344&oldid=85338

#
Loqi Scapadis made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85341&oldid=85340

#
Loqi Eprodrom made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85342&oldid=85341

#
eprodrom q+
#
eprodrom tantek: We didn't get all meet in Paris, didn't get everyone in Cambridge
#
eprodrom tantek: the last time we met at TPAC in Santa Clara, it was hugely successful
#
eprodrom tantek: we made a lot of progress
#
ben_thatmustbeme whoever just joined, is pretty noisy

#
KevinMarks realised I was playing "wish you were here" from the cafe - sorry

#
eprodrom tantek: we also had a lot of participation from TPAC attendees who wouldn't have come just for a Social Web meeting
#
eprodrom tantek: if there's one WG F2F, this is the one to make
#
KevinMarks where is TPAC this time?

#
ben_thatmustbeme KevinMarks, Sapporo JP

#
KevinMarks so $85 a day is trivial compared to travel then

#
tantek KevinMarks: see https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-10-29 and yes, travel will be an expense, as it is for everyone else who traveled to Santa Clara who wasn't in the bay area

#
KevinMarks if I have an expense account for travel, I'll go… TPAC is very good

#
eprodrom eprodrom: could we have better attendance in the USA around the same time period?
#
ben_thatmustbeme there are already people going to JP / have flights

#
ben_thatmustbeme so changing now would probably be bad

#
eprodrom Arnaud: we have a commitment to do this
#
eprodrom Arnaud: we have an 8-week period required for any travel
#
ben_thatmustbeme I think AnnB has expressed her intention of going

#
tantek but definitely add yourself anyway as a Maybe if that's what you are: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-10-29#Maybe

#
eprodrom Arnaud: if there's a 90% chance you'll be there, please note it
#
eprodrom Arnaud: Ann has asked if people in the WG would meet with the IG in the same time period next week
#
eprodrom TOPIC: Activity Streams 2.0
#
eprodrom TOPIC: Raised issues for AS 2.0
#
eprodrom Arnaud: There are two issues that have been raised for AS 2.0
#
eprodrom Arnaud: one is related to microformats
#
tantek cwebber2, can you add yourself to https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-10-29#Regrets ?

#
eprodrom Arnaud: https://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/44
#
eprodrom Arnaud: it's understood that these examples are only informative, and there's an open action to fix them
#
eprodrom q+
#
ben_thatmustbeme rhiaro: has been working on a PR for more too

#
Loqi Eprodrom made 2 edits to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85347&oldid=85344

#
Loqi Rhiaro made 2 edits to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85349&oldid=85347

#
Loqi Sandro made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85346&oldid=85345

#
eprodrom csarven: Previous resolutions were about trying to improve the state of microformats in the doc
#
eprodrom csarven: What made it into the document didn't reflect the action
#
eprodrom csarven: The microformat examples are quite draft
#
eprodrom csarven: Whether the AS vocabulary should talk about any except AS is an question
#
eprodrom csarven: all the other examples are AS
#
eprodrom csarven: the microformats examples don't map closely
#
eprodrom Arnaud: The issue title and the problem are misaligned
#
ben_thatmustbeme q+ to discuss ISSUE-45 to try to bring up misaligned MF2

#
eprodrom Arnaud: The issue is that there is a misalignment for the mf and AS 2.0 examples
#
eprodrom Arnaud: we should consider different solutions
#
eprodrom tantek, thanks
#
KevinMarks are the other examples any better?

#
eprodrom ben_thatmustbeme: when I updated the examples, I was putting in the best practices for the community at large right now
#
KevinMarks they are in principle interchangeable; are they in practice?

#
KevinMarks have you parsed them all into a uniform form and compared them?

#
KevinMarks (the ones in the document)

#
eprodrom ben_thatmustbeme: do the align completely? No. But that's not the purpose.
#
eprodrom Arnaud: ben_thatmustbeme touched on issue 45.
#
eprodrom Arnaud: let's close issue 44 in favour of issue 45
#
eprodrom Arnaud: one possibility is that we remove the examples
#
eprodrom ha ha
#
KevinMarks csarven: vocabulary versus syntax

#
KevinMarks you can represent any vocab in mf2

#
eprodrom +1
#
KevinMarks +1

#
Loqi Cwebber2 made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85350&oldid=85349

#
eprodrom csarven: I disagree that 44 and 45 are related
#
eprodrom csarven: 45 talks about changing the examples to meet the requirements of mf
#
KevinMarks if you want an example of representing arbitrary vocab in mf2, see http://www.kevinmarks.com/microformatschema.html

#
eprodrom csarven: these are different issues
#
KevinMarks I think it does, yes, but csarven is strawmanning about process

#
eprodrom csarven: we can at least have the documentation for why we came up with the examples
#
eprodrom Arnaud: issues are about stating a problem, not suggesting a solution
#
ben_thatmustbeme point of order, we are not voting on "Closing" any issue, but rather "Rejecting"

#
eprodrom q+
#
eprodrom Arnaud: we are 35 minutes into the call, I'm going to overrule and not open issue 44
#
eprodrom Arnaud: we will defer to issue 45
#
eprodrom TOPIC: Publish AS 2.0 as a Candidate Recommendation
#
eprodrom Arnaud: after consultation with jasnell I think we should take AS 2.0 to CR to move the process along
#
eprodrom q+
#
eprodrom q-
#
eprodrom Arnaud: I'd like to ask jasnell where we are with the spec
#
eprodrom jasnell: The core spec has not changed much at all
#
eprodrom jasnell: except to keep it up-to-date with vocabulary
#
eprodrom jasnell: it is stable
#
eprodrom jasnell: no open issues for core
#
eprodrom jasnell: two major issues for vocabulary
#
ben_thatmustbeme is anyone else getting choppy audio for jasnell?

#
ben_thatmustbeme might be just me

#
eprodrom jasnell: issue 193, related to changes to the collection paging model
#
ben_thatmustbeme cleared up, just connection here then

#
eprodrom jasnell: also collection properties
#
eprodrom q+
#
eprodrom Arnaud: harry sent an email about the requirements to go to CR
#
eprodrom Arnaud: one requirement is to have our issues closed
#
eprodrom Arnaud: some issues in Tracker are not closed
#
eprodrom eprodrom: do we need to have interoperable implementations for CR?
#
jasnell btw... in terms of implementation, http://github.com/jasnell/activitystrea.ms is up to date to the current editor's draft
#
eprodrom Arnaud: no, CR means that we are showing to the world and asking for implementations
#
eprodrom Arnaud: we do need to have a test suite
#
eprodrom Arnaud: once the spec is frozen for CR, we can move on to test suite
#
eprodrom sandro: we should know how long the CR period will be
#
eprodrom q+
#
eprodrom eprodrom: pump.io will implement
#
eprodrom Arnaud: who else is planning to implement
#
eprodrom sandro, thanks, true
#
eprodrom melvster: we will consider demonstration implementations
#
KevinMarks we should contact large-scale users of AS1 to see if they are interested in implementing

#
eprodrom Arnaud: what are the exit criteria and what is the time frame?
#
eprodrom Arnaud: one is the expiration of the working group
#
eprodrom Arnaud: another is having two implementations
#
KevinMarks gnip, echo et al

#
eprodrom Arnaud: In practice, it's a minimum of two
#
eprodrom Arnaud: But it should be more
#
eprodrom Arnaud: we have had this case before and chose not to go forward
#
tantek q+ to note that per process we have to have zero open issues, if they're trivial, then that trivial work needs to be done to propose + drive resolutions BEFORE proposing going to CR. but there's a bigger elephant in the room, which is that AS2 and modern interoperable publishing practices continue to diverge. It's VERY BAD for a spec for it and modern practices to diverge, and we need to acknowledge that.

#
eprodrom Arnaud: let's move on
#
eprodrom tantek: we have to hit 0 issues for the spec
#
eprodrom tantek: if we have trivial issues, we have to wrap them up
#
eprodrom tantek: I feel that AS 2.0 and modern publishing and consuming practices on the web have continued to diverge
#
eprodrom tantek: that's bad for any spec
#
eprodrom tantek: if it doesn't reflect practice, then it's a bad direction
#
eprodrom tantek: standards work best when they reflect current practice
#
eprodrom Arnaud: we should discuss and consider for next call
#
eprodrom TOPIC: Social Web API
#
ben_thatmustbeme this is a pretty good doc amy made

#
ben_thatmustbeme rhiaro++

#
eprodrom Arnaud: cwebber to discuss API requirements created by rhiaro
#
KevinMarks echoplatform.com and http://support.gnip.com/apis/consuming_streaming_data.html both translate various silos into AS1 JSON

#
eprodrom cwebber2: Amy broke down the user stories into a structured data format
#
eprodrom cwebber2: with color-coded marks
#
eprodrom cwebber2: we're thinking of using this document as a bridge
#
eprodrom cwebber2: since it works more or less like a todo list
#
tantek cwebber2++ for walking us through https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/Requirements - good way to attempt to focus

#
ben_thatmustbeme cwebber2++ for presenting that

#
eprodrom cwebber2: aaronpk, rhiaro and cwebber2 will work on implementations
#
KevinMarks there is a mismatch between https://www.w3.org/wiki/Activity_Streams#Implementations and https://www.w3.org/wiki/Activity_Streams/Examples

#
eprodrom cwebber2: this will help us compare where specs are in sync or not
#
KevinMarks we should audit https://www.w3.org/wiki/Activity_Streams#Implementations to see if any examples exist

#
eprodrom cwebber2: is anyone else interested in implementations
#
eprodrom cwebber2: both aaronpk and rhiaro are re-engineering their sites
#
eprodrom jasnell: if you're looking at the document, there's different color-coding
#
eprodrom Oh crap
#
eprodrom Thanks
#
eprodrom aaronpk: if you're looking at the document, there's different color-coding
#
eprodrom aaronpk: and we can use those color-codes to break down the effort in the integration
#
ben_thatmustbeme cwebber2, i am trying to keep my site up to date as much as possible when i have time

#
eprodrom q+
#
eprodrom ben_thatmustbeme: I will be working on SWAT0
#
eprodrom Arnaud: any other comments?
#
eprodrom q+
#
jasnell before we close, just a reminder to everyone: I need input on github issues #191 and #193 as mentioned earlier (https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/193, https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/191)
#
ben_thatmustbeme these are the only approved ones

#
aaronpk oh it looks like we approved *only* the +1 ones https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-05-12-minutes#approve-all-plus-one-user-stories

#
eprodrom ben_thatmustbeme: yes, we only approved ones that were unanimous
#
ben_thatmustbeme Arnaud++

#
eprodrom ben_thatmustbeme: we tried to approve 1/0 ones, but couldn't get consensus
#
ben_thatmustbeme eprodrom++

#
eprodrom Arnaud: closing, will have next meeting in two weeks
#
RRSAgent I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/08/11-social-minutes.html trackbot

#
ben_thatmustbeme Loqi stopped at the end there

#
ben_thatmustbeme eprodrom++

#
ben_thatmustbeme Arnaud++

#
ben_thatmustbeme rhiaro++

#
ben_thatmustbeme try to capture some of that karma :)

bblfish and KevinMarks joined the channel
bblfish joined the channel