#social 2015-08-11
2015-08-11 UTC
jasnell, bblfish_ and csarven joined the channel
# Loqi Abasset made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-08-11]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85328&oldid=85327
the_frey, the_frey_, peacekeeper and jaywink joined the channel
# Loqi Hhalpin made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-08-11]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85333&oldid=85328
bblfish, pfefferle and jasnell joined the channel
# Loqi Alehors made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-08-11]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85335&oldid=85333
bblfish, melvster and jasnell_ joined the channel
tantek joined the channel
# ben_thatmustbeme so its october?
# ben_thatmustbeme updated
# ben_thatmustbeme thanks melvster for pointing that out
# Loqi Benthatmustbeme made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-08-11]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85336&oldid=85335
# ben_thatmustbeme NEW phone number: +1-617-324-0000 There is a meeting number: 642 112 960 The password is still 'socl' (lowercase, easier for mobile). [WebEx]
KevinMarks, tantek and eprodrom joined the channel
# eprodrom Hello all
# ben_thatmustbeme hey
cwebber2 joined the channel
# ben_thatmustbeme bloop
# eprodrom I forget the recipe for declaring presence
# eprodrom +present eprodrom
# eprodrom Is that it?
# eprodrom Ah right
# eprodrom present+ eprodrom
# eprodrom ah
RRSAgent joined the channel
# RRSAgent logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/08/11-social-irc
Zakim joined the channel
# eprodrom present+ aaronpk
# eprodrom ha ha
# eprodrom Whoops
# eprodrom present+ eprodrom
# ben_thatmustbeme present+ ben_thatmustbeme
# ben_thatmustbeme present+ sandro
# ben_thatmustbeme present+ tantek
# ben_thatmustbeme present+ Arnaud
# eprodrom I will scribe
# ben_thatmustbeme I'll scribe
# eprodrom scribenick eprodrom
# ben_thatmustbeme smiles
# eprodrom Arnaud: first, admin part
# eprodrom Arnaud: any objections to approving the minutes?
# ben_thatmustbeme i have
# ben_thatmustbeme +1 to approve
# eprodrom I opened and read
# eprodrom +1
# eprodrom RESOLVED: Approval of Minutes of 28 July 2015
# eprodrom TOPIC: Next F2F meeting
# eprodrom Arnaud: sandro has suggested we need to discuss F2F
# ben_thatmustbeme really wishes he could go :*(
# eprodrom Arnaud: next F2F is in October in Japan
# eprodrom Arnaud: it is normal to have events around the world for the W3C
# eprodrom Arnaud: but it is a significant travel effort
# eprodrom Arnaud: It is a chicken-and-egg issue
# eprodrom Arnaud: we're not asking for hard commitments but we're looking for some intentions
# eprodrom Arnaud: it's better to have ideas of intentions rather than no idea at all
# eprodrom Arnaud: TPAC requires registration
# eprodrom Arnaud: so we have to do both (wiki and TPAC registration)
# KevinMarks present+ kevinmarks
# eprodrom Arnaud: There is a cost associated with participating at TPAC (~$85/day)
# eprodrom Arnaud: it includes a big conference experience (food, space, etc.)
# ben_thatmustbeme $85 is if you get your tickets in before a certain date
# eprodrom Arnaud: and a good opportunity to cross-pollinate
# ben_thatmustbeme it costs more if you register too late
# Loqi Alehors made 2 edits to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85338&oldid=0
# Loqi Alehors made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-08-11]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85339&oldid=85336
# Loqi Sandro made 3 edits to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85344&oldid=85338
# Loqi Scapadis made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85341&oldid=85340
# Loqi Eprodrom made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85342&oldid=85341
# eprodrom q+
# eprodrom tantek: We didn't get all meet in Paris, didn't get everyone in Cambridge
# eprodrom tantek: the last time we met at TPAC in Santa Clara, it was hugely successful
# eprodrom tantek: we made a lot of progress
# ben_thatmustbeme whoever just joined, is pretty noisy
# KevinMarks realised I was playing "wish you were here" from the cafe - sorry
# eprodrom tantek: we also had a lot of participation from TPAC attendees who wouldn't have come just for a Social Web meeting
# eprodrom tantek: if there's one WG F2F, this is the one to make
# KevinMarks where is TPAC this time?
# ben_thatmustbeme KevinMarks, Sapporo JP
# KevinMarks so $85 a day is trivial compared to travel then
# tantek KevinMarks: see https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-10-29 and yes, travel will be an expense, as it is for everyone else who traveled to Santa Clara who wasn't in the bay area
# KevinMarks if I have an expense account for travel, I'll go… TPAC is very good
# eprodrom eprodrom: could we have better attendance in the USA around the same time period?
# ben_thatmustbeme there are already people going to JP / have flights
# ben_thatmustbeme so changing now would probably be bad
# eprodrom Arnaud: we have a commitment to do this
# eprodrom Arnaud: we have an 8-week period required for any travel
# ben_thatmustbeme I think AnnB has expressed her intention of going
# tantek but definitely add yourself anyway as a Maybe if that's what you are: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-10-29#Maybe
# eprodrom Arnaud: if there's a 90% chance you'll be there, please note it
# eprodrom Arnaud: Ann has asked if people in the WG would meet with the IG in the same time period next week
# eprodrom TOPIC: Activity Streams 2.0
# eprodrom TOPIC: Raised issues for AS 2.0
# eprodrom Arnaud: There are two issues that have been raised for AS 2.0
# eprodrom Arnaud: one is related to microformats
# tantek cwebber2, can you add yourself to https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-10-29#Regrets ?
# eprodrom Arnaud: https://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/44
# eprodrom Arnaud: it's understood that these examples are only informative, and there's an open action to fix them
# eprodrom q+
# ben_thatmustbeme rhiaro: has been working on a PR for more too
# Loqi Eprodrom made 2 edits to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85347&oldid=85344
# Loqi Rhiaro made 2 edits to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85349&oldid=85347
# Loqi Sandro made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85346&oldid=85345
# eprodrom csarven: Previous resolutions were about trying to improve the state of microformats in the doc
# eprodrom csarven: What made it into the document didn't reflect the action
# eprodrom csarven: The microformat examples are quite draft
# eprodrom csarven: Whether the AS vocabulary should talk about any except AS is an question
# eprodrom csarven: all the other examples are AS
# eprodrom csarven: the microformats examples don't map closely
# eprodrom Arnaud: The issue title and the problem are misaligned
# ben_thatmustbeme q+ to discuss ISSUE-45 to try to bring up misaligned MF2
# eprodrom Arnaud: The issue is that there is a misalignment for the mf and AS 2.0 examples
# eprodrom Arnaud: we should consider different solutions
# eprodrom tantek, thanks
# KevinMarks are the other examples any better?
# eprodrom ben_thatmustbeme: when I updated the examples, I was putting in the best practices for the community at large right now
# KevinMarks they are in principle interchangeable; are they in practice?
# KevinMarks have you parsed them all into a uniform form and compared them?
# KevinMarks (the ones in the document)
# eprodrom ben_thatmustbeme: do the align completely? No. But that's not the purpose.
# eprodrom Arnaud: ben_thatmustbeme touched on issue 45.
# eprodrom Arnaud: let's close issue 44 in favour of issue 45
# eprodrom Arnaud: one possibility is that we remove the examples
# eprodrom ha ha
# KevinMarks csarven: vocabulary versus syntax
# KevinMarks you can represent any vocab in mf2
# eprodrom +1
# KevinMarks +1
# Loqi Cwebber2 made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2015-10-29]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=85350&oldid=85349
# eprodrom csarven: I disagree that 44 and 45 are related
# eprodrom csarven: 45 talks about changing the examples to meet the requirements of mf
# KevinMarks if you want an example of representing arbitrary vocab in mf2, see http://www.kevinmarks.com/microformatschema.html
# eprodrom csarven: these are different issues
# KevinMarks I think it does, yes, but csarven is strawmanning about process
# eprodrom csarven: we can at least have the documentation for why we came up with the examples
# eprodrom Arnaud: issues are about stating a problem, not suggesting a solution
# ben_thatmustbeme point of order, we are not voting on "Closing" any issue, but rather "Rejecting"
# eprodrom q+
# eprodrom Arnaud: we are 35 minutes into the call, I'm going to overrule and not open issue 44
# eprodrom Arnaud: we will defer to issue 45
# eprodrom TOPIC: Publish AS 2.0 as a Candidate Recommendation
# eprodrom Arnaud: after consultation with jasnell I think we should take AS 2.0 to CR to move the process along
# eprodrom q+
# eprodrom q-
# eprodrom Arnaud: I'd like to ask jasnell where we are with the spec
# eprodrom jasnell: The core spec has not changed much at all
# eprodrom jasnell: except to keep it up-to-date with vocabulary
# eprodrom jasnell: it is stable
# eprodrom jasnell: no open issues for core
# eprodrom jasnell: two major issues for vocabulary
# ben_thatmustbeme is anyone else getting choppy audio for jasnell?
# ben_thatmustbeme might be just me
# eprodrom jasnell: issue 193, related to changes to the collection paging model
# ben_thatmustbeme cleared up, just connection here then
# eprodrom jasnell: also collection properties
# eprodrom q+
# eprodrom Arnaud: harry sent an email about the requirements to go to CR
# eprodrom Arnaud: one requirement is to have our issues closed
# eprodrom Arnaud: some issues in Tracker are not closed
# eprodrom eprodrom: do we need to have interoperable implementations for CR?
# jasnell btw... in terms of implementation, http://github.com/jasnell/activitystrea.ms is up to date to the current editor's draft
# eprodrom Arnaud: no, CR means that we are showing to the world and asking for implementations
# eprodrom Arnaud: we do need to have a test suite
# eprodrom Arnaud: once the spec is frozen for CR, we can move on to test suite
# eprodrom sandro: we should know how long the CR period will be
# eprodrom q+
# eprodrom eprodrom: pump.io will implement
# eprodrom Arnaud: who else is planning to implement
# eprodrom sandro, thanks, true
# eprodrom melvster: we will consider demonstration implementations
# KevinMarks we should contact large-scale users of AS1 to see if they are interested in implementing
# eprodrom Arnaud: what are the exit criteria and what is the time frame?
# eprodrom Arnaud: one is the expiration of the working group
# eprodrom Arnaud: another is having two implementations
# KevinMarks gnip, echo et al
# eprodrom Arnaud: In practice, it's a minimum of two
# eprodrom Arnaud: But it should be more
# eprodrom Arnaud: we have had this case before and chose not to go forward
# tantek q+ to note that per process we have to have zero open issues, if they're trivial, then that trivial work needs to be done to propose + drive resolutions BEFORE proposing going to CR. but there's a bigger elephant in the room, which is that AS2 and modern interoperable publishing practices continue to diverge. It's VERY BAD for a spec for it and modern practices to diverge, and we need to acknowledge that.
# eprodrom Arnaud: let's move on
# eprodrom tantek: we have to hit 0 issues for the spec
# eprodrom tantek: if we have trivial issues, we have to wrap them up
# eprodrom tantek: I feel that AS 2.0 and modern publishing and consuming practices on the web have continued to diverge
# eprodrom tantek: that's bad for any spec
# eprodrom tantek: if it doesn't reflect practice, then it's a bad direction
# eprodrom tantek: standards work best when they reflect current practice
# eprodrom Arnaud: we should discuss and consider for next call
# eprodrom TOPIC: Social Web API
# ben_thatmustbeme this is a pretty good doc amy made
# ben_thatmustbeme rhiaro++
# eprodrom Arnaud: cwebber to discuss API requirements created by rhiaro
# KevinMarks echoplatform.com and http://support.gnip.com/apis/consuming_streaming_data.html both translate various silos into AS1 JSON
# eprodrom cwebber2: Amy broke down the user stories into a structured data format
# eprodrom cwebber2: with color-coded marks
# eprodrom cwebber2: we're thinking of using this document as a bridge
# eprodrom cwebber2: since it works more or less like a todo list
# tantek cwebber2++ for walking us through https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/Requirements - good way to attempt to focus
# ben_thatmustbeme cwebber2++ for presenting that
# eprodrom cwebber2: aaronpk, rhiaro and cwebber2 will work on implementations
# KevinMarks there is a mismatch between https://www.w3.org/wiki/Activity_Streams#Implementations and https://www.w3.org/wiki/Activity_Streams/Examples
# eprodrom cwebber2: this will help us compare where specs are in sync or not
# KevinMarks we should audit https://www.w3.org/wiki/Activity_Streams#Implementations to see if any examples exist
# eprodrom cwebber2: is anyone else interested in implementations
# eprodrom cwebber2: both aaronpk and rhiaro are re-engineering their sites
# eprodrom jasnell: if you're looking at the document, there's different color-coding
# eprodrom Oh crap
# eprodrom Thanks
# eprodrom aaronpk: if you're looking at the document, there's different color-coding
# eprodrom aaronpk: and we can use those color-codes to break down the effort in the integration
# ben_thatmustbeme cwebber2, i am trying to keep my site up to date as much as possible when i have time
# eprodrom q+
# eprodrom ben_thatmustbeme: I will be working on SWAT0
# eprodrom Arnaud: any other comments?
# eprodrom q+
# jasnell before we close, just a reminder to everyone: I need input on github issues #191 and #193 as mentioned earlier (https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/193, https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/191)
# ben_thatmustbeme these are the only approved ones
# aaronpk oh it looks like we approved *only* the +1 ones https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-05-12-minutes#approve-all-plus-one-user-stories
# eprodrom ben_thatmustbeme: yes, we only approved ones that were unanimous
# ben_thatmustbeme Arnaud++
# eprodrom ben_thatmustbeme: we tried to approve 1/0 ones, but couldn't get consensus
# ben_thatmustbeme eprodrom++
# eprodrom Arnaud: closing, will have next meeting in two weeks
# RRSAgent I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/08/11-social-minutes.html trackbot
# ben_thatmustbeme Loqi stopped at the end there
# ben_thatmustbeme eprodrom++
# ben_thatmustbeme Arnaud++
# ben_thatmustbeme rhiaro++
# ben_thatmustbeme try to capture some of that karma :)
bblfish and KevinMarks joined the channel
bblfish joined the channel