#social 2016-02-08

2016-02-08 UTC
prtksxna, jasnell, kevinmarks3, kevinmarks2, jasnell_, bblfish, jaywink, prtksxna_, the_frey and shevski joined the channel
#
Loqi Eprodrom made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-02-09]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97463&oldid=0
#
cwebber2 o/
#
cwebber2 morning, *
bblfish and shepazu joined the channel
#
Loqi Eprodrom made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-01-26-minutes]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97468&oldid=0
bblfish, KevinMarks, the_frey, ElijahLynn, tessierashpool_, ElijahLynn_, tessierashpool__, jasnell and prtksxna joined the channel
#
cwebber2 squintss at document
#
cwebber2 https://github.com/w3c-social/activitypub/issues/60 is this true? so, I'm still new to this whole spec writing thing
#
cwebber2 should things about authorization be intertwined with the section where they're being written
#
cwebber2 or should it go into a section at the bottom
#
cwebber2 or should notes about surprising security tricky things go at the bottom and the part that flows with relevant sections go where you'd think they would
#
cwebber2 makes a confused puppy face
jasnell joined the channel