#social 2016-09-26

2016-09-26 UTC
KevinMarks, jasnell, jasnell_, Kilo, KjetilK, tantek, Arnaud and timbl joined the channel
#
Loqi Tantekelik made 2 edits to [[Socialwg/2016-09-22]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=100228&oldid=100221
#
Loqi Tantekelik made 1 edit to [[Socialwg]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=100225&oldid=99820
Arnaud joined the channel
#
cwebber2 so, today I aim to get out wide review, i18n review, accessibility review, security review
#
cwebber2 I can do the former, and I have info for emailing i18n... I forget what the steps are for requesting accessibility / security review stuff
#
cwebber2 I looked on list, it looked like sandro emailed the groups for the last round... I'm not sure what to do for this
#
cwebber2 maybe rhiaro knows?
jasnell joined the channel
#
cwebber2 right, there's a security checklist https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/
#
Loqi [Mike West] Self-Review Questionnaire: Security and Privacy
#
cwebber2 I'm not sure about accessibility
#
cwebber2 if there's something similar
#
cwebber2 does anyone know?
jasnell joined the channel
#
rhiaro cwebber2: I don't think there's an accessibility one, you just have to email
#
cwebber2 rhiaro: gotcha, ok thx :)
#
cwebber2 going through checklists
tantek, Arnaud and the_frey joined the channel
#
csarven cwebber2: We added https://linkedresearch.org/ldn/#security-and-privacy-review -- mostly brief response, some expanded.
#
csarven tantek: Is there an URL under w3.org that we can use for the security/privacy review in the spec? Currently we are referring to https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/
#
Loqi [Mike West] Self-Review Questionnaire: Security and Privacy
#
tantek hello
#
tantek checks
#
tantek I believe there has been at least note / draft published
#
csarven Anyhwere a bit more authoritative than github.io would be great.
#
tantek checks https://github.com/w3ctag/security-questionnaire/issues
#
tantek found it
#
tantek https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/
#
Loqi [Mike West] Self-Review Questionnaire: Security and Privacy
#
tantek please use that instead of the w3ctag.github.io reference
#
tantek and cite the specific dated version (in order to match up the questions accordingly, since they'll likely change / grow over time)
#
tantek Thanks!
#
tantek csarven++ thanks for the prompting question. posted: http://tantek.com/2016/270/t1/edit-specs-add-security-privacy-appenix and tweeted: https://twitter.com/t/status/780436223949049856 hopefully that will help other editors do the same.
#
Loqi csarven has -31 karma (6 in this channel)
#
Loqi [Tantek Çelik] Edit specs @W3C? Please add a Security & Privacy appendix answering: https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/ and cite dated version....
#
Loqi [@t] Edit specs @W3C? Please add a Security & Privacy appendix answering: https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/ and cite dated version. (ttk.me t4jW1)
#
csarven tantek Updated. Thanks!
#
csarven http://www.specref.org/?q=Self-Review%20Questionnaire%3A%20Security%20and%20Privacy
#
csarven Citing the NOTE URL instead now.
tantek, timbl, jasnell, jasnell_, timbl_ and Arnaud joined the channel
#
aaronpk hooray for non github.ionURLs
Arnaud joined the channel
#
cwebber2 maybe some day we'll kill all github usage :)
#
cwebber2 federated social coing web
newton joined the channel
#
aaronpk no need to kill github. we should just be able to fork a repo from github to our own git server, and send a pull request back to github from it