#social 2017-04-19
2017-04-19 UTC
tantek and tantek_ joined the channel
tantek joined the channel
tantek and tantek_ joined the channel
#
tantek ok issue filed https://github.com/w3c-social/social-web-protocols/issues/45 cc: aaronpk

timbl and tantek joined the channel
#
ben_thatmustbeme reading back

#
ben_thatmustbeme actually i think webfinger to URL equivalent and reverse is a good topic on its own

#
ben_thatmustbeme possibly as an entirely seperate note?

#
ben_thatmustbeme it has implications well outside of AP certainly

KevinMarks, dmitriz and timbl joined the channel
#
Loqi Cwebber2 made 3 edits to [[Socialwg/2017-04-18]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=102557&oldid=0

#
Loqi Sandro made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2017-04-18]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=102556&oldid=102555

#
Loqi Eprodrom made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2017-04-18]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=102571&oldid=102557

#
Loqi Aaronpk made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2017-04-18-minutes]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=102572&oldid=0

#
Loqi Tantekelik made 1 edit to [[Socialwg]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=102580&oldid=102504

#
Loqi Tantekelik made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2017-04-25]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=102590&oldid=102508

KevinMarks_ and KevinMarks joined the channel
#
cwebber hey sandro
#
cwebber sandro: so we're not supposed to accept contributions from outside the socialwg for actual spec stuff for legal reasons, but what about just for vector drawings?
#
cwebber sandro: eg, if someone were to vector'ify the ascii art I did
#
cwebber I imagine that's ok to put in the spec without the person having signed the agreement?
#
cwebber https://mastodon.social/users/VamptVo/updates/1953521 apparently the person doing the Mastodon implementation of AP really likes the tutorial I did
#
ben_thatmustbeme i would guess that would be a question for wseltzer

#
cwebber I can do the graphics myself, I'm just very slow at it, and I might know someone who is interested in helping
#
ben_thatmustbeme i think we had to add some terms to the git repo

#
wseltzer cwebber, if someone wants to create graphics from your illustration (or text), that could be a non-substantive contribution
#
wseltzer i.e, no patent issues. We still want their copyright permission to reproduce it
#
cwebber wseltzer: ok, cool. Would getting their submission to a github thread and their ACK there of copyright permission be sufficient?
#
wseltzer sure
#
cwebber cool
#
wseltzer I think we've got the contributor copyright covered in our github contributors.md