#social 2017-04-19

2017-04-19 UTC
tantek and tantek_ joined the channel
#
tantek
reviews today's logs (PDT)
#
Loqi
tantek: rhiaro left you a message 3 days, 21 hours ago: I added updating SWP to the agenda for the 25th, but happy to bump this to tuesday
#
tantek
rhiaro++
#
Loqi
rhiaro has 138 karma in this channel (254 overall)
tantek joined the channel
#
tantek
in reading the updated ED of SWP I think we should expand Webmention to cover Update and Delete as well (since it does), and explicitly mention it is (effectively) a server-to-server API
tantek and tantek_ joined the channel
timbl and tantek joined the channel
#
ben_thatmustbeme
reading back
#
ben_thatmustbeme
actually i think webfinger to URL equivalent and reverse is a good topic on its own
#
ben_thatmustbeme
possibly as an entirely seperate note?
#
ben_thatmustbeme
it has implications well outside of AP certainly
KevinMarks, dmitriz and timbl joined the channel
KevinMarks_ and KevinMarks joined the channel
#
cwebber
hey sandro
#
cwebber
sandro: so we're not supposed to accept contributions from outside the socialwg for actual spec stuff for legal reasons, but what about just for vector drawings?
#
cwebber
sandro: eg, if someone were to vector'ify the ascii art I did
#
cwebber
I imagine that's ok to put in the spec without the person having signed the agreement?
#
cwebber
https://mastodon.social/users/VamptVo/updates/1953521 apparently the person doing the Mastodon implementation of AP really likes the tutorial I did
#
Loqi
[Evan Minto] @cwebber This is a great, succinct tutorial! Might be nice to get this sort of thing written up on Medium or something so it's more accessible....
#
ben_thatmustbeme
i would guess that would be a question for wseltzer
#
cwebber
I can do the graphics myself, I'm just very slow at it, and I might know someone who is interested in helping
#
ben_thatmustbeme
i think we had to add some terms to the git repo
#
wseltzer
cwebber, if someone wants to create graphics from your illustration (or text), that could be a non-substantive contribution
#
wseltzer
i.e, no patent issues. We still want their copyright permission to reproduce it
#
cwebber
wseltzer: ok, cool. Would getting their submission to a github thread and their ACK there of copyright permission be sufficient?
#
wseltzer
sure
#
cwebber
cool
#
wseltzer
I think we've got the contributor copyright covered in our github contributors.md
#
csarven
What if the contribution is say CC0 or CC BY or ../
#
csarven
I should ask: what are the guidelines for including free culture works?
#
Loqi
totally